Assess the Efficacy of OM-89 vs Placebo in Reducing Antibiotic Consumption Associated With the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in Patients With Neurogenic Bladder
NCT ID: NCT06588010
Last Updated: 2025-09-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-16
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The very frequent recurrence of urinary tract infections encourages exposure to antibiotics, so prevention is of vital importance. Prevention based on treatments other than antibiotics (non-antibiotic prophylaxis) is of the greatest interest, not only to prevent UTIs, but also to reduce exposure to antibiotics and the ecological pressure they exert. However, few strategies are available, and very few have been well evaluated in high-risk populations.
Bacterial lysates such as Escherichia Coli extract (OM-89), an immunoactive prophylaxis, are an original and innovative strategy that has been developed for the prevention of recurrent UTIs, and could constitute a therapeutic option in particularly at-risk populations.
In vivo studies have shown that OM-89 :
* increases IgA levels in intestinal secretions and in the urine of mice (Bosh AV Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 1988; Baier W Arzneim Forsch Drug Res 1997),
* stimulates the production of serum IgG and IgA recognising a number of bacteria isolated from patients with urinary tract infections and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli infections (Huber M, Int J immunopharmacol 2000),
* stimulates the killing capacity of rabbit polymorphonuclear leukocytes against E. coli and S. aureus (Nauck M, Int J Exp Clin Chemother 1991),
* protects against acute infection with E. coli or P. aeruginosa,
* and inhibits inflammation associated with lipopolysaccharide-induced cystitis in mice (Lee SJ, World J Urol 2006).
Clinically, certain studies in patients with recurrent UTIs have shown a significant reduction in the number of urinary tract infections with OM-89 compared to placebo or an antibiotic (Bauer Eur Urol 2005; Naber KG Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; Wade DT, Clin Rehabil 2020).
However, these promising results suffer from methodological limitations and need to be confirmed by a high-quality trial carried out on a sample appropriate to the research question and in a homogeneous patient population.
Patients with spinal cord injuries are a population at high risk of recurrent UTIs, and prevention is a major issue, given the incidence of MRBs in this population. It is therefore important in this high-risk population not only to rigorously evaluate the efficacy of OM-89 in reducing antibiotic consumption for UTIs, but also to assess its impact on bacterial resistance and on the microbiota (urinary and digestive). These patients could therefore see significant benefits: less frequent urinary tract infections and reduced antibiotic use. In addition, this population could serve as a model for other populations with or without neurological impairment suffering from recurrent UTIs
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preventing UTIs in Chronic Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction (Mix Methods)
NCT02591901
Safety and Efficacy of a Weekly Oral Cyclic Antibiotic Programme in the Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection on Neurological Bladder
NCT01388413
The Urinary Microbiome in Patients Receiving Intradetrusor Botox Injections
NCT04479709
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Neurogenic Bladder Botox
NCT04791579
Single Dose Monurol for Treatment of Acute Cystitis
NCT00976963
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients in the experimental arm
OM-89 [Uro-Vaxom® Capsule] OM-89 placebo [Uro-Vaxom® Capsule placebo]
1st phase: 1 capsule per day of placebo for 90 consecutive days followed by a period of 90 days without treatment, then one capsule per day of placebo for 10 consecutive days each month for three months.
Then 2nd phase: 1 capsule a day of OM-89, for 90 consecutive days followed by a period of 90 days without treatment, then one capsule a day of OM-89 6mg for 10 consecutive days each month for three months.
Patients in the control arm
OM-89 [Uro-Vaxom® Capsule]
1st phase and 2nd phase : 1 capsule per day of OM-89 for 90 consecutive days followed by a period of 90 days without treatment, then one capsule per day of OM-89 for 10 consecutive days each month for three months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OM-89 [Uro-Vaxom® Capsule]
1st phase and 2nd phase : 1 capsule per day of OM-89 for 90 consecutive days followed by a period of 90 days without treatment, then one capsule per day of OM-89 for 10 consecutive days each month for three months.
OM-89 [Uro-Vaxom® Capsule] OM-89 placebo [Uro-Vaxom® Capsule placebo]
1st phase: 1 capsule per day of placebo for 90 consecutive days followed by a period of 90 days without treatment, then one capsule per day of placebo for 10 consecutive days each month for three months.
Then 2nd phase: 1 capsule a day of OM-89, for 90 consecutive days followed by a period of 90 days without treatment, then one capsule a day of OM-89 6mg for 10 consecutive days each month for three months.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient aged 18 years or older
* Patient with a stabilised neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury thaht has not progressed for more than 2 years and who has undergone a urodynamic examination in the last 2 years.
* Patients using CIC (5 to 6 per day)
* Patients who have received at least 6 courses of antibiotic treatment for UTIs in the 12 months prior to screening (whether for curative or prophylactic reasons)
* Patients with a negative urine culture between screening visit and randomisation or treated with antibiotics for urinary decontamination prior to randomisation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Person subject to a measure of legal protection (guardianship, tutorship)
* Person subject to a court order
* Adults unable to express consent
* Patients using a urinary drainage method other than CIC
* Patients with urinary lithiasis at the time of inclusion (assessed by renal imaging in the previous year as part of routine management for patients with a history(s) of lithiasis or within 3 years for patients with no history)
* Presence of an endo-urinary device (urinary prosthesis, ureteral stent)
* Enterocystoplasty or irradiated bladder (past or present)
* Known allergy or previous intolerance to the active substance or one of the excipients of OM-89 or placebo
* Patient requiring ongoing or short-term prolonged antibiotic therapy (e.g. infected bedsore, etc.)
* Patient treated with bacterial lysates (including OM-89) in the 6 months prior to randomisation
* Unable or unwilling to stop prophylactic antibiotic therapy prior to randomisation
* Patient with a known malignant tumour or neoplasia
* Patient with an autoimmune disease
* Patient treated with long-term or bolus corticosteroids, anti-CD20 and anti-rejection therapy in the 6 months prior to screening
* Patient currently taking part in another study on an investigational device or drug related to urinary tract infections, or who has received another investigational treatment in the 30 days prior to screening.
* Patient unable to collect information in a daily diary.
* Patient unable to understand follow-up by telephone.
* Patients planning to move to another residence in the year following randomisation
* Non-menopausal women who are not surgically sterile (bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy) AND pregnant, breast-feeding who are declare that they are planning to conceive at inclusion, or not using effective\* contraception.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PIROTH OMPharma 2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.