Comparison of 6F and 7F Sheaths for Coronary Intervention Via Distal Radial Artery Access

NCT ID: NCT06585917

Last Updated: 2025-02-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

574 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-10

Study Completion Date

2026-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicenter, randomized controlled, prospective, non-inferiority, open-label study aiming to evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of using a 7F thin-walled sheath via distal radial artery (dTRA) access for coronary intervention (PCI) are non-inferior to the use of a 6F thin-walled sheath. The study population includes adult patients who are candidates for coronary intervention. The primary endpoint is the rate of radial artery and distal radial artery occlusion 24 hours post-procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a multicenter, randomized controlled, prospective, non-inferiority, open-label clinical trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of using 7F thin-walled sheaths versus 6F thin-walled sheaths for coronary intervention (PCI) via distal radial artery access (dTRA). The study will enroll adult patients with coronary artery disease who are scheduled to undergo PCI.

Participants will be randomized into two groups: the experimental group, which will receive PCI using a 7F sheath, and the control group, which will receive PCI using a 6F sheath. The primary endpoint is the rate of radial artery and distal radial artery occlusion 24 hours post-procedure, assessed by ultrasound. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events during follow-up, cannulation success rate, PCI success rate, and the rate of radial artery occlusion at 30 days post-procedure, among others.

The study aims to determine whether the 7F sheath is non-inferior to the 6F sheath in terms of safety and efficacy for PCI through dTRA. The study will be conducted at multiple centers in China, with a planned enrollment of 574 participants, and it will span from Sep 2024 to January 2026. All procedures will adhere to the highest standards of clinical practice, and patient data will be managed with strict confidentiality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PCI Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study uses a Parallel Assignment model, where participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: the 7F sheath intervention group or the 6F sheath control group. Each group will receive a different size sheath for coronary intervention via distal radial artery access. The study is designed to compare the outcomes between these two groups, with no crossover between groups during the trial. This model allows for a direct comparison of the efficacy and safety between the two sheath sizes under similar clinical conditions.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

7F Sheath Intervention Group

Participants in this arm will undergo coronary intervention using a 7F thin-walled sheath via distal radial artery access. This group will be used to assess the efficacy and safety of the 7F sheath compared to the 6F sheath.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

7F Thin-Walled Sheath

Intervention Type DEVICE

The 7F Thin-Walled Sheath is used during coronary intervention procedures via distal radial artery access. This device has a smaller outer diameter compared to traditional 7F sheaths, designed to reduce the risk of vascular complications while allowing for the performance of complex coronary interventions.

6F Sheath Control Group

Participants in this arm will undergo coronary intervention using a 6F thin-walled sheath via distal radial artery access. This group will serve as the control to compare the outcomes against those of the 7F sheath group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

6F Thin-Walled Sheath

Intervention Type DEVICE

The 6F Thin-Walled Sheath is the standard device used in coronary intervention procedures via distal radial artery access. It is employed as a control in this study to compare its efficacy and safety against the 7F Thin-Walled Sheath.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

7F Thin-Walled Sheath

The 7F Thin-Walled Sheath is used during coronary intervention procedures via distal radial artery access. This device has a smaller outer diameter compared to traditional 7F sheaths, designed to reduce the risk of vascular complications while allowing for the performance of complex coronary interventions.

Intervention Type DEVICE

6F Thin-Walled Sheath

The 6F Thin-Walled Sheath is the standard device used in coronary intervention procedures via distal radial artery access. It is employed as a control in this study to compare its efficacy and safety against the 7F Thin-Walled Sheath.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years and ≤80 years;
* Height ≤180 cm;
* Distal radial artery diameter ≥1.7 mm;
* Completed distal radial artery angiography and requires coronary intervention;
* Tolerates dual antiplatelet therapy and intraoperative anticoagulant therapy, with no history of related drug allergies;
* Patient consents to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute myocardial infarction requiring emergency PCI;
* Ultrasound-confirmed occlusion of the radial artery on the procedure side;
* Radial artery and distal radial artery anomalies (e.g., small caliber, tortuous, looped vessels) that make the dTRA approach unsuitable;
* Previous bilateral radial artery intervention or surgery;
* No coronary intervention performed after coronary angiography;
* Inability to undergo coronary angiography and intervention due to subjective or objective reasons;
* Coronary lesions requiring the use of a 7F guiding catheter;
* Coronary arteries not suitable for 7F guiding catheter;
* Severe liver or renal insufficiency, unresolved bleeding disorders, or other serious conditions with an expected survival of less than 1 year;
* Currently breastfeeding or known pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lijian Gao, PhD. MD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liu M, Du Y, Cui C, Li C, Yu W, Wang H, Song Y, Gao Z, Song L, Zhai J, Yang Y, Yang W, Wu Y, Liu D, Guo J, Heisha N, Liu H, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Tang Y, Zhao Y, Yu M, Zhang B, Yang J, Li R, Li H, Xiong X, Guo X, Li H, Song Y, Duan F, Gao L. Distal Radial Artery Access With 6F and 7F Thin-Walled Sheaths for Coronary Intervention: A Multicentre, Randomized, DRAWS Trial Protocol. Can J Cardiol. 2025 Sep 13:S0828-282X(25)01057-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2025.09.002. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40953816 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-2377

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TAVR With Echocardiography Guidance
NCT07035847 RECRUITING NA