Oral Liposomal Iron Versus Injectable Iron Sucrose for Anemia Treatment in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

NCT ID: NCT06556134

Last Updated: 2024-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-01

Study Completion Date

2024-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to assess the comparative effects of intravenous and liposomal oral iron on hemoglobin levels in non-dialysis CKD patients. Additionally, it seeks to evaluate the rate of hemoglobin correction, iron reserve status during treatment, and therapeutic tolerance to these interventions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The last two and a half decades have seen erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron therapy at the forefront of managing anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. While ESAs have demonstrated significant efficacy in alleviating anemia in this context, recent large-scale randomized controlled trials in both non-dialysis and dialysis CKD patients have shed light on their limitations. Attempts to normalize hemoglobin (Hb) levels with ESAs have shown no significant cardiovascular benefits but have been associated with increased risks of adverse events such as stroke and venous thromboembolism.

Consequently, there has been a reduction in ESA prescription and an increase in blood transfusions, coupled with a notable rise in the use of iron therapy due to its role in addressing hypo responsiveness to ESAs.

Anemia stands as a common complication in CKD, significantly impacting cardiovascular health and quality of life. While renal erythropoietin production deficit remains a primary cause, iron deficiency plays a pivotal role in CKD-related anemia genesis. Iron deficiency, whether absolute or functional, alongside an inflammatory block, often seen in CKD patients, accounts for the main reasons behind hypo responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

The recent shift in focus from ESA-centered treatment to iron therapy has prompted debates regarding the ideal route of iron administration, particularly in non-dialysis CKD patients. Despite the benefits of oral iron-cost-effectiveness and ease of administration-its usage remains limited due to poor gastrointestinal absorption and high adverse event rates. Conversely, concerns about IV iron revolve around potential kidney damage, infections, atherosclerosis promotion, and other adverse reactions.

Given these considerations, our study aims to compare the efficacy of oral liposomal iron against IV iron in treating anemia in non-dialysis CKD patients in terms of :

1. Martial status under treatment.
2. Hemoglobin level and its correction speed.
3. Therapeutic tolerance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GROUP IV

Group IV received intravenous iron-hydroxide sucrose complex (marketed as Fermed® 100mg), administered in a dose of 100 mg, diluted in 250 mL of normal saline, and infused weekly for a period of 3 month

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intravenous Iron Sucrose

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous iron-hydroxide sucrose complex administered in a dose of 100 mg, diluted in 250 mL of normal saline, and infused weekly for a period of 3 months

GROUP OS

Group OS received one oral capsule per day, containing 30 mg of pyrophosphate liposomal iron and 70 mg of ascorbic acid (marketed as Lisofer® 30mg), for the same 3-month duration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oral Iron

Intervention Type DRUG

One oral capsule per day, containing 30 mg of pyrophosphate liposomal iron and 70 mg of ascorbic acid

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intravenous Iron Sucrose

Intravenous iron-hydroxide sucrose complex administered in a dose of 100 mg, diluted in 250 mL of normal saline, and infused weekly for a period of 3 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral Iron

One oral capsule per day, containing 30 mg of pyrophosphate liposomal iron and 70 mg of ascorbic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Fermed® 100mg Lisofer® 30mg

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

Withdrawal from the study occurs in the case of severe anemia needing an urgent blood transfusion or non-adherence and withdrawal of consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Hassan II - Fès

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tariq Sqalli Houssaini, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Laboratory of Epidemiology and Health Science Research, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Hassan II University Hospital

Fes, Fès-Meknes, Morocco

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Morocco

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pisani A, Riccio E, Sabbatini M, Andreucci M, Del Rio A, Visciano B. Effect of oral liposomal iron versus intravenous iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in CKD patients: a randomized trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Apr;30(4):645-52. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu357. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25395392 (View on PubMed)

Agrawal S, Sonawane S, Kumar S, Acharya S, Gaidhane SA, Wanjari A, Kabra R, Phate N, Ahuja A. Efficacy of Oral Versus Injectable Iron in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Two-Year Cross-Sectional Study Conducted at a Rural Teaching Hospital. Cureus. 2022 Jul 31;14(7):e27529. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27529. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36060352 (View on PubMed)

Macdougall IC, Bock AH, Carrera F, Eckardt KU, Gaillard C, Van Wyck D, Roubert B, Nolen JG, Roger SD; FIND-CKD Study Investigators. FIND-CKD: a randomized trial of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus oral iron in patients with chronic kidney disease and iron deficiency anaemia. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Nov;29(11):2075-84. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu201. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24891437 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PREFER

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.