Evaluation of Safety of Acellular Dermal Matrix(ADM) in Breast Reconstruction
NCT ID: NCT06555614
Last Updated: 2024-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-13
2027-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of ADM(SC Derm® Recon) in Breast Reconstruction
NCT06553859
Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Acellular Dermal Matrix(SC DERM® Recon) in Breast Reconstruction
NCT06555692
Impact of ADM in Reduction of Surgical Complexity of Breast Reconstructions With Implants (Nava)
NCT01853436
Dermacell ADM Without Basement Membrane
NCT03667560
Use of an Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose After Thyroid Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study
NCT01171079
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The total number of study subjects is 120, with 60 people recruited prospectively into the test group and 60 people retrospectively into the control group.
The test group will receive SC Derm Recon(ADM processed by CO2 supercritical fluid technology) during the implant-based breast reconstruction surgery.
The control group will be retrospectively and consecutively selected from medical records of patients who underwent implant breast reconstruction using ADM from other companies between March 1, 2021, and March 31, 2024.
After surgery, patients will be followed up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks.
Primary Objectives
I. To assess whether the test group with applying the ADM processed by the supercritical fluid technology will have less short-term major complications than the control group with the ADM processed by detergents.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Test Group
A prospectively selected group that will receive breast reconstruction surgery with an acellular dermal matrix called "SC Derm Recon," which is processed using carbon dioxide supercritical fluid technology.
Acellular Dermal Matrix(ADM)
A comparison of the short-term complications associated with acellular dermal matrix in the test group and the control group.
Control Group
A retrospectively selected group that has undergone breast reconstruction surgery with an acellular dermal matrix processed using chemical detergents.
Acellular Dermal Matrix(ADM)
A comparison of the short-term complications associated with acellular dermal matrix in the test group and the control group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Acellular Dermal Matrix(ADM)
A comparison of the short-term complications associated with acellular dermal matrix in the test group and the control group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Retrospective Medical Record Collection 1) Patients who received an acellular dermal matrix product during breast reconstruction surgery with implants following a mastectomy due to breast cancer at Seoul National University Hospital between March 1, 2021, and March 31, 2024.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Retrospective Medical Record Collection 1) Patients who received an acellular dermal matrix product but have no recorded follow-up visits after application.
19 Years
79 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
DOF Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kiyong Hong, Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Seoul National University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
National Health Insurance: Early Treatment Increases Survival Rates for Breast Cancer Patients, with a 6.9% Increase Over the Past 5 Years. Press Release, 2023-05-26.
Disa JJ, McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Hu QY, Cordeiro PG. Postmastectomy reconstruction: an approach to patient selection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):43-52.
Colwell AS, Taylor EM. Recent Advances in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):421e-432e.
Sigurdson L, Lalonde DH. MOC-PSSM CME article: Breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jan;121(1 Suppl):1-12.
Gabriel A, Maxwell GP. Discussion: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep;140(3):444-446.
Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep;140(3):432-443.
Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):232-9.
Gamboa-Bobadilla GM. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jan;56(1):22-5.
Bindingnavele V, Gaon M, Ota KS, Kulber DA, Lee DJ. Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(11):1214
Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E. Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Aug;120(2):373-81.
Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jul;57(1):1-5.
Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Sep;59(3):250-5.
Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 May;32(3):418-25.
Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ. The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg. 2008 May;60(5):510-3.
Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):346-56.
Vidya R, Cawthorn SJ. Muscle-Sparing ADM-Assisted Breast Reconstruction Technique Using Complete Breast Implant Coverage: A Dual-Institute UK-Based Experience. Breast Care (Basel). 2017 Sep;12(4):251-254.
Vidya R, Iqbal FM. A Guide to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A New Dimension to Implant-based Breast Reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Jul;17(4):266-271.
Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, Storm-Dickerson TL, Pope N, Rice J, Gabriel A. Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Rationale, Indications, and Preliminary Results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):287-294.
Cattelani L et. al., One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation. Clin Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e703-e711.
Walter RJ, Matsuda T, Reyes HM, Walter JM, Hanumadass M. Characterization of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) prepared by two different methods. Burns. 1998 Mar;24(2):104-13.
Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns. 1995 Jun;21(4):243-8.
Lemer ML, Chaikin DC, Blaivas JG. Tissue strength analysis of autologous and cadaveric allografts for the pubovaginal sling. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(5):497-503.
Romo T 3rd, Sclafani AP, Sabini P. Reconstruction of the major saddle nose deformity using composite allo-implants. Facial Plast Surg. 1998;14(2):151-7.
Neishabouri A, Soltani Khaboushan A, Daghigh F, Kajbafzadeh AM, Majidi Zolbin M. Decellularization in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Evaluation, Modification, and Application Methods. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Apr 25;10:805299.
Giang NN, Trinh XT, Han J, Chien PN, Lee J, Noh SR, Shin Y, Nam SY, Heo CY. Effective decellularization of human skin tissue for regenerative medicine by supercritical carbon dioxide technique. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2022 Dec;16(12):1196-1207.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-01-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.