Microsampling for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Oral Oncolytics in Oncology Patients

NCT ID: NCT06545292

Last Updated: 2025-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-06

Study Completion Date

2028-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to perform a clinical validation of the analytical method for dried blood spot microsampling of cabozantinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, imatinib, abiraterone, enzalutamide, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab or enfortumab vedotin. The secondary objective is to test the feasibility of home monitoring (microsampling TDM) of cabozantinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, imatinib, abiraterone, enzalutamide, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab or enfortumab vedotin in oncology patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Oral targeted anti-cancer drugs are a relatively novel group of drugs with a complex pharmacological profile. Due to the high pharmacokinetic interpatient variability and advised fixed dose a wide variability in blood concentrations is seen in patients. Chances for individuals patients are high to be either underdoses (\>30% of patients) or overdoses (\>15%), which can lead to either decreased efficacy or severe side effects. In recent years, the development of monoclonal antibodies has changed the standard of care for treatment of many cancer types. While a small group of patients can have persisting efficacy, costs of monoclonal antibodies are extremely high. While no predictive biomarker has been established to predict response before treatment, recent research has shown clearance of immune checkpoint inhibitors varies over time and predicts early response. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), based on measured drug levels, is a well-established method for personalized dosing of drugs. It has become part of standard of care when treating patients with oral antineoplastic agents. Currently, venous blood sampling is performed at the hospital. Home sampling of oral oncolytics by taking capillary blood samples by patients themselves provides many benefits. It could reduce the burden of extra blood sampling at the hospital and the need for additional phone calls afterwards for dose guiding. As of today, microsampling of immune checkpoint inhibitors is exploratory. Additionally, home sampling offers the possibility to collect multiple samples over a dose interval, and to base dose recommendation on AUC, rather than only on trough concentrations (Ctrough). To achieve this goal, clinical validation and implementations studies for microsampling are warranted.

Objective: The primary objective is to perform a clinical validation of the analytical method for dried blood spot microsampling of cabozantinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, imatinib, abiraterone, enzalutamide, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab or enfortumab vedotin. The secondary objective is to test the feasibility of home monitoring (microsampling TDM) of cabozantinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, imatinib, abiraterone, enzalutamide, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab or enfortumab vedotin in oncology patients.

Study design: A single center prospective clinical validation study. Study population: Patients treated in the LUMC with cabozantinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, imatinib, abiraterone, enzalutamide, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab or enfortumab vedotin.

Intervention (if applicable): Patients who use an oral oncolytic will be asked to provide twelve microsamples obtained by finger prick (eight dried blood spots (DBS) and four wet blood samples in microtainer EDTA) and four paired whole blood (WB) samples obtained by venapuncture. The paired samples have to be obtained within 5 minutes of each other. Sampling will take place before the ingestion of the oral oncolytic (through concentration, Cthrough) and every hour for three hours after drug administration (C1, C2 and C3).

Patients who receive immune checkpoints inhibitors will be asked to provide eight microsamples obtained by finger prick (six DBS and two wet blood in microtainer EDTA) and two paired WB samples obtained by venapuncture. Sampling will take place just before infusion (Ctrough) and 15 minutes after the end of the infusion (Cinfusion+0.25) of the next cycle of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Microsampling collection will be performed using two different sampling devices, HemaXis DB 10 and Mitra Clamshell. Patients will be assisted by a research nurse with the sampling of the first spot, and the sampling of the remaining spots will be performed by the patient. In order to evaluate patient satisfaction with both DBS sampling devices, patients will receive two kits for home use of both HemaXis DB 10 and Mitra Clamshell. Patients will be asked to perform four blood trough concentrations at home, two with every device. After obtaining the fourth sample, patients will be asked to send the samples by post to the laboratory. In order to evaluate patient satisfaction with both DBS sampling devices, patients will be asked to fill the System Usability Scale (SUS).

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the method agreement between whole blood sample (WBS) and DBS. The secondary endpoints are the success rate of DBS and the difference in SUS score between HemaXis DB 10 and Mitra Clamshell.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Drug Monitoring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A single center prospective clinical validation study.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Microsampling arm

Patients who use an oral oncolytic will be asked to provide twelve microsamples obtained by finger prick:

* 6 dried blood spots (DBS)
* 6 volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS))

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Therapeutic drug monitoring with a dried blood spot and microatainer.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients who use an oral oncolytic will be asked to provide four paired whole blood (WB) samples obtained by venapuncture.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Therapeutic drug monitoring with a dried blood spot and microatainer.

Patients who use an oral oncolytic will be asked to provide four paired whole blood (WB) samples obtained by venapuncture.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Willing and able to provide informed consent;
* 18 years of age or older;
* Using one or more of the following drugs: Cabozantinib, Pazopanib, Sunitinib, Lenvatinib, Imatinib, Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab or Enfortumab vedotin

Exclusion Criteria

* Not able to sample themselves using a finger prick
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Leiden University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

dr. Tom van der Hulle

Medical Oncologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tom Van Der Hulle, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

0031715263464

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

86496

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pharmacokinetic Boosting of Osimertinib
NCT03858491 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
The Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP Trial)
NCT02925234 RECRUITING PHASE2