Microsampling for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Oral Oncolytics in Oncology Patients
NCT ID: NCT06545292
Last Updated: 2025-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
360 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-06
2028-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
OPTI - DOSE: Optimal Dosing of Oral Anticancer Drugs in Older Adults
NCT05949424
The ROAD 2.0 to Sustainable Medication Use: Redispensing Unused Oral Anticancer Drugs
NCT06566560
Weekly Administration of (bi-)Daily Oral Docetaxel in Combination With Ritonavir
NCT01173913
The Food-effect on Alectinib Pharmacokinetics
NCT05710133
Investigation of the Effect of Nintedanib on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combination of Ethinylestradiol and Levonorgestrel in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02751385
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: The primary objective is to perform a clinical validation of the analytical method for dried blood spot microsampling of cabozantinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, imatinib, abiraterone, enzalutamide, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab or enfortumab vedotin. The secondary objective is to test the feasibility of home monitoring (microsampling TDM) of cabozantinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, imatinib, abiraterone, enzalutamide, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab or enfortumab vedotin in oncology patients.
Study design: A single center prospective clinical validation study. Study population: Patients treated in the LUMC with cabozantinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, imatinib, abiraterone, enzalutamide, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, bevacizumab or enfortumab vedotin.
Intervention (if applicable): Patients who use an oral oncolytic will be asked to provide twelve microsamples obtained by finger prick (eight dried blood spots (DBS) and four wet blood samples in microtainer EDTA) and four paired whole blood (WB) samples obtained by venapuncture. The paired samples have to be obtained within 5 minutes of each other. Sampling will take place before the ingestion of the oral oncolytic (through concentration, Cthrough) and every hour for three hours after drug administration (C1, C2 and C3).
Patients who receive immune checkpoints inhibitors will be asked to provide eight microsamples obtained by finger prick (six DBS and two wet blood in microtainer EDTA) and two paired WB samples obtained by venapuncture. Sampling will take place just before infusion (Ctrough) and 15 minutes after the end of the infusion (Cinfusion+0.25) of the next cycle of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Microsampling collection will be performed using two different sampling devices, HemaXis DB 10 and Mitra Clamshell. Patients will be assisted by a research nurse with the sampling of the first spot, and the sampling of the remaining spots will be performed by the patient. In order to evaluate patient satisfaction with both DBS sampling devices, patients will receive two kits for home use of both HemaXis DB 10 and Mitra Clamshell. Patients will be asked to perform four blood trough concentrations at home, two with every device. After obtaining the fourth sample, patients will be asked to send the samples by post to the laboratory. In order to evaluate patient satisfaction with both DBS sampling devices, patients will be asked to fill the System Usability Scale (SUS).
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the method agreement between whole blood sample (WBS) and DBS. The secondary endpoints are the success rate of DBS and the difference in SUS score between HemaXis DB 10 and Mitra Clamshell.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Microsampling arm
Patients who use an oral oncolytic will be asked to provide twelve microsamples obtained by finger prick:
* 6 dried blood spots (DBS)
* 6 volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS))
Therapeutic drug monitoring with a dried blood spot and microatainer.
Patients who use an oral oncolytic will be asked to provide four paired whole blood (WB) samples obtained by venapuncture.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Therapeutic drug monitoring with a dried blood spot and microatainer.
Patients who use an oral oncolytic will be asked to provide four paired whole blood (WB) samples obtained by venapuncture.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years of age or older;
* Using one or more of the following drugs: Cabozantinib, Pazopanib, Sunitinib, Lenvatinib, Imatinib, Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab or Enfortumab vedotin
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
dr. Tom van der Hulle
Medical Oncologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
86496
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.