Appropriate Dosing to Optimise Personalised Cancer Treatments

NCT ID: NCT04154163

Last Updated: 2022-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-10

Study Completion Date

2021-03-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a pilot study to assess feasibility of dried blood spot (DBS) samples for pharmacokinetic measurements of targeted anti-cancer drugs in oncology patients such as patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving targeted treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the pharmacology laboratory, we have developed a method for measuring drug concentrations in animals using dried blood spots (DBS). DBS is a simple method that could be easily carried out by patients at home, using either filter paper-based DBS cards (e.g. Whatman 903, FTA DMPK-C) or small sponges (www.neoteryx.com).

The routine use of DBS to clinically test blood was first used in the 1960s as a safe and simple method of testing for inherited metabolic disorders in new born babies. However, in recent years there has been increasing use of DBS to test blood for other things, including for drugs as a way to monitor the drug level in the blood.

This method has great potential application in testing blood for drug levels in cancer patients. We wish to establish if this DBS technique is feasible in real-life practice for cancer patients on targeted anti-cancer therapies as should this be the case this innovation could herald a new era in personalised treatment of advanced human cancers allowing doctors to more safely use combinations of targeted therapies. These combinations of targeted therapies have been shown to inhibit development of drug resistance and are increasingly being used in clinical practice. However, targeted therapies often fail (especially combinations of targeted therapies) because of unacceptable toxicities making them intolerable for the patient. With an easy and acceptable method for monitoring the drug level in blood, as could be provided by DBS, the right amount of drug could be given to each individual patient and this 'personalised' drug dosing as standard of care might result in much greater success with combinations of anti-cancer drugs.

This drug monitoring is especially important for targeted anti-cancer therapies because many of these (such as Dabrafenib, used for many cases of advanced melanoma) have profound affects on the liver enzymes that metabolise (get rid of) most medications. Dabrafenib is a potent inducer of P450 liver enzymes and this induction means that other drugs metabolised by the same liver pathway (the great majority of drugs are metabolised by the same pathways) will have significantly reduced blood levels if the patient is on Dabrafenib. So it is especially important to be able to monitor blood levels of both Dabrafenib and of other co-medications that the patient may be taking. The DBS sampling method would allow this and would provide a safe, convenient and cheap test that could be conducted in the patient's home and posted back to the laboratory.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma Stage III Melanoma Stage IV Ovarian Cancer Renal Cancer Stage III Renal Cancer Stage IV Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stage 1 Participants

Blood test Day 1 DBS and venous blood

Blood test Day 2 DBS (+/- and venous blood)

Blood test Day 15 DBS only

Blood test Day 16 DBS only

Dried blood Spot (DBS)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Dried Blood Spot filter paper and sponges

Venous blood sampling

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Venous blood

Stage 2 Participants

Non-drug naive participants:

Blood test Day 1 DBS

Blood test Day 2 DBS

Blood test Day 15 DBS

Blood test Day 16 DBS

Drug naive participants:

Blood test Day 1 DBS

Blood test Day 2 DBS

Blood test Day 3, 4, or 5 DBS

Blood test Day 4, 5 or 6 DBS

Blood test Day 15 DBS

Blood test Day 16 DBS

Dried blood Spot (DBS)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Dried Blood Spot filter paper and sponges

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dried blood Spot (DBS)

Dried Blood Spot filter paper and sponges

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Venous blood sampling

Venous blood

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DBS home collection kits Phlebotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female participants
* Age 18 years and over
* Confirmed diagnosis of stage 4 or stage 3 unresectable cancers; BRAF+ melanoma, c-KIT+ melanoma, advanced renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma.
* Able to perform study assessments
* Individuals who are participating in the follow-up phase of another interventional trial/study, or who are enrolled in an observational study, will be co-enrolled where the CIs of each study agree that it is appropriate

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to give informed consent
* World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status 3-4
* Known allergy or intolerance to Dabrafenib +/- Trametinib, Prazopanib, Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Imatinib, Osimertinib or Olaparib
* Unstable co-morbidities; cardiovascular disease e.g. severe congestive cardiac failure, end stage renal failure, hepatic impairment, vasculopathy, inflammatory arthritis or interstitial lung disease/ pneumonitis which, in the opinion of the CI, would make the patient unsuitable to be enrolled in the study
* Language barrier preventing adequate understanding of the study and a lack of suitable translator service to overcome this barrier
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Dundee

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charlotte Proby, MBBS,FRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chief Investigator

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NHS Tayside and University of Dundee

Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Robijns K, Koster RA, Touw DJ. Therapeutic drug monitoring by dried blood spot: progress to date and future directions. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014 Nov;53(11):1053. doi: 10.1007/s40262-014-0197-3. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25312497 (View on PubMed)

de Wit D, den Hartigh J, Gelderblom H, Qian Y, den Hollander M, Verheul H, Guchelaar HJ, van Erp NP. Dried blood spot analysis for therapeutic drug monitoring of pazopanib. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Dec;55(12):1344-50. doi: 10.1002/jcph.558. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26032288 (View on PubMed)

Nijenhuis CM, Huitema AD, Marchetti S, Blank C, Haanen JB, van Thienen JV, Rosing H, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH. The Use of Dried Blood Spots for Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Vemurafenib Treatment in Melanoma Patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;56(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1002/jcph.728. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26918324 (View on PubMed)

Ouellet D, Gibiansky E, Leonowens C, O'Hagan A, Haney P, Switzky J, Goodman VL. Population pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor: effect of dose, time, covariates, and relationship with its metabolites. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jun;54(6):696-706. doi: 10.1002/jcph.263. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24408395 (View on PubMed)

Friedl B, Kurlbaum M, Kroiss M, Fassnacht M, Scherf-Clavel O. A method for the minimally invasive drug monitoring of mitotane by means of volumetric absorptive microsampling for a home-based therapeutic drug monitoring. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019 Jul;411(17):3951-3962. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-01868-1. Epub 2019 May 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31093700 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2-032-19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.