Development and Validation of an Automated Self-administered Visual Acuity System
NCT ID: NCT06540001
Last Updated: 2024-08-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-01
2025-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of an Automated Optical Coherence Tomography and Camera : Effectiveness of Vision-700
NCT06496763
Developing Better Computerised Vision Tests (CVTV)
NCT06224751
Repeatability and Agreement of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) and Thermography
NCT01479790
Functional Assessments in Vision Impairment
NCT06908161
Evaluation of a Digital Visual Acuity Device vs. Standard Visual Acuity Measurements
NCT06431295
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are a few existing online applications that allow self-eye checks, however there are limitations. They are usually done at an intermediate distance, i.e. distance from phone to eye and does not accurately represent true distance vision. Distance vision is typically set at 4- 6m in a clinical setting.
A visual acuity test is administered by specially trained healthcare personnel, such as optometrists and patient service assistants, which is often time-consuming and labour intensive, where one-on-one attention is required. In addition, vision is subjective and re-testing may be required at times to ensure accurate vision assessment.
As the visual acuity test is the first clinical station patient goes to after registration, this leads to a bottleneck in workflow causes delays in the subsequent services and eventually increases patient waiting times in the clinics.
This project aims to develop and validate an automated Visual Acuity (VA) station through speech-to-text and computer vision technology in comparison to existing manual VA assessments.
We hypothesize that we are able to use artificial intelligence to understand patient\'s speech and posture to automate the visual acuity test. We also hypothesize that the automated visual acuity test is comparable to having VA checked manually by a clinic staff.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients will undergo both automated and manual visual acuity testing
Patient will perform manual visual acuity first, then be guided to another room to have the visual acuity tested on the automated VA device
Automated visual acuity
The automated visual acuity device is developed in collaboration with Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore Institute of Technology and Nanyang Technological University. It uses artificial intelligence for pose estimation and speech recognition to infer if the participant is reading the correct letters displayed on the screen.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Automated visual acuity
The automated visual acuity device is developed in collaboration with Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore Institute of Technology and Nanyang Technological University. It uses artificial intelligence for pose estimation and speech recognition to infer if the participant is reading the correct letters displayed on the screen.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have at least counting finger vision
3. Patients who is able to speak in an audible and clear voice
4. Patients who is able to use a digital device independently (e.g. handphone)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with hearing difficulties
3. Patients with speech difficulties
4. Patients who have cognitive impairment
5. Patients who are hemiplegic/ motor dysfunction
6. Patients who have vision worse than counting fingers
7. Patients who are pregnant
21 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore Institute of Technology
OTHER
Nanyang Technological University
OTHER
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University
UNKNOWN
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Li Zhenghao Kelvin
Consultant
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024/00157
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.