Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-09
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question this study aims to answer is: Does the Couplet Care bassinet have better maternal-infant outcomes compared to the standard bassinet?
The mother participants will:
-be surveyed about experiences with and use of the bassinet including: the mother's sleep, breastfeeding, calls to staff, infant location, and satisfaction.
Charts will be reviewed for additional outcomes.
Hospital staff and administrators will be surveyed about experiences with the bassinet.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardboard Cot: Prevention of Moderate or Severe Hypothermia in Preterm Infants Assigned to Open Crib
NCT03344991
Clinical Evaluation of the "NICU Clinical Decision Support Dashboard" - CHMCO
NCT03673566
Prone or Supine Effect After Caesarean Delivery on Respiratory Outcomes in Full Term Infants
NCT02692573
A Father-friendly Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
NCT05521620
Respiratory Stability and Vegetative Coupling During Neonatal Skin-to-skin Care
NCT03827252
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To ensure usability and safety, the Couplet Care bassinet design incorporates (1) a lower tub wall with access points, making it easier for a mother to reach her infant, (2) adjustability features that allow for bassinet positioning over the mother, and (3) a design that secures the tub into the frame.
In this phase of the project, the researchers will build on insights of Phase I to refine Couplet Care bassinet design, so it is manufacturable and compliant with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. Next, the Study Team component of the study will:
1. Evaluate the impact of the Couplet Care bassinet on maternal-infant patient outcomes in a powered randomized controlled trial (RCT)
2. Evaluate the usability and adoptability of the device from clinician perspectives. Successful accomplishment of this Phase II effort will position the Couplet Care bassinet for commercialization, delivering a bassinet that promotes safe mother-infant connection during rooming-in, while reducing the risk of infant drops/falls and suffocation, maternal waking from unmet infant needs, and demands on nurses for assistance for non-medical needs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Couplet Care Bassinet
125 mother-infant pairs will be assigned the Couplet Care bassinet. This bassinet has adjustability features to allow for bassinet positioning over the mother to enable access to the baby, secures the tub in the frame, and has a wall with access points.
Couplet Care Bassinet
Couplet Care Bassinet
Standard Bassinet
125 mother-infant pairs will be assigned the current hospital bassinet offered at the research site. The current bassinet is an unanchored acrylic tub with high walls on a wheeled cart with some storage.
Standard Bassinet
Standard Bassinet
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Couplet Care Bassinet
Couplet Care Bassinet
Standard Bassinet
Standard Bassinet
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* at least 18 years of age
* who can communicate in English
Exclusion Criteria
* participant has an infant who is not rooming-in, such as for infant or maternal intensive care
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Couplet Care LLC
UNKNOWN
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cecilia Tomori, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tully KP, Ball HL. Postnatal unit bassinet types when rooming-in after cesarean birth: implications for breastfeeding and infant safety. J Hum Lact. 2012 Nov;28(4):495-505. doi: 10.1177/0890334412452932. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
Tully KP, Ball HL. Maternal accounts of their breast-feeding intent and early challenges after caesarean childbirth. Midwifery. 2014 Jun;30(6):712-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
Taylor, Catherine & Tully, Kristin & Ball, Helen. (2015). Night-time on a postnatal ward: experiences of mothers, infants, and staff.
Seashore C, Tully KP. Preventing Newborn Falls and Improving Care for Postpartum Women and Their Newborns. Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Sep;8(9):593-594. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0121. Epub 2018 Aug 1. No abstract available.
Grant D. The "Quiet Revolution" and the cesarean section in the United States. Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Dec;47:101192. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101192. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Brooke J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 1996;189(194):4-7
Crenshaw JT. Healthy Birth Practice #6: Keep Mother and Baby Together- It's Best for Mother, Baby, and Breastfeeding. J Perinat Educ. 2014 Fall;23(4):211-7. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.23.4.211.
Consales A, Crippa BL, Cerasani J, Morniroli D, Damonte M, Bettinelli ME, Consonni D, Colombo L, Zanotta L, Bezze E, Sannino P, Mosca F, Plevani L, Gianni ML. Overcoming Rooming-In Barriers: A Survey on Mothers' Perspectives. Front Pediatr. 2020 Feb 21;8:53. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00053. eCollection 2020.
Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC, Medley N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 25;11(11):CD003519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub4.
McKeever J, Fleur RS. Overcoming barriers to Baby-Friendly status: one hospital's experience. J Hum Lact. 2012 Aug;28(3):312-4. doi: 10.1177/0890334412440627. Epub 2012 May 17.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00316391
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.