The Effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine Versus Methotrexate in the Treatment of Lichen Planopilaris in Routine Clinical Care: a Patient Preference Trial
NCT ID: NCT06512753
Last Updated: 2024-07-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
56 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-07-01
2026-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective(s) To investigate the effectiveness of HCQ and MTX in the treatment of adults with lichen planopilaris in routine clinical care.
Study type Prospective, patient preference clinical trial with a duration up to 48 weeks in accordance with the routine clinical care guidelines.
Study population This study will include adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with LPP.
Methods Patients will choose between HCQ and MTX treatment as in routine clinical care, receiving follow-up in accordance with standard clinical practices. They will not be randomized. The primary endpoint is the measurement of the Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) at the 6-months, providing a quantitative assessment of the disease's activity and response to the selected treatment. The Skindex-29 questionnaire will be conducted at each visit, allowing evaluation of the impact on patients' quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hydroxychloroquine vs. Clobetasol Rinse to Treat Oral Lichen Planus
NCT00102557
Systemic Treatment Options for Generalized Lichen Planus
NCT06739551
Study of the Characteristics of Pruritus in Patients With Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia or Lichen Planus Pilaris
NCT05761158
Methotrexate Polyglutamates as a Marker of Clinical Response and Toxicity in the Treatment of Psoriasis
NCT02174354
Comparison Between Oral Methotrexate and Tofacitinib in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
NCT07261306
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This patient preferred trial aims to fill a crucial knowledge gap in LPP management. Existing evidence lacks comprehensive guidelines for treating LPP effectively, leaving current approaches largely empirical. Aligning with the urgent need for answers highlighted by the 'Nederlandse Vereniging voor Dermatologie en Venereologie Kennisagenda Dermatologie 2019': 'Q9 - Wat is de effectiviteit van systemische behandeling bij patiënten met cicatriciële alopeciëen?' (What is the most effective systemic treatment for cicatricial alopecias) (13) underscores the pressing concern regarding the effectiveness of systemic therapy in cicatricial alopecia. This study seeks to contribute novel insights to the field by comparing the effectiveness of the two most commonly used systemic treatments, HCQ and MTX in treating LPP. By comparing the effectiveness and safety profiles of these systemics, this study endeavours to provide valuable information that can guide evidence-based treatment decisions and enhance the overall understanding of LPP management.
Objective(s)
The main objective is to assess the effectiveness in routine clinical care of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of adults diagnosed with lichen planopilaris (LPP) by evaluating the impact on the Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) after a 6-month treatment period.
Primary objective:
To investigate the difference in LPPAI between baseline and 24 weeks of treatment between the HCQ and MTX group
Secondary objectives:
2\. To compare LPPAI between HCQ and MTX at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks.
3\. To compare the quality of life between HCQ and MTX at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks.
4\. To compare the side effects of HCQ and MTX.
5\. To compare the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy due to sides effects in both groups.
Skindex-29
The Skindex-29 is a dermatology-specific questionnaire. It evaluates the effect of skin conditions on physical, psychological, and social aspects. It assesses the extent to which a skin condition has influenced quality of life over the past week. The 29 questions are divided into 3 domains: symptoms, emotions, and functioning. A higher score corresponds to a greater impact on quality of life.
Other disease- and treatment-related characteristics will be retrieved from the electronic patient records.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)
HCQ is administered orally at a dosage of 400 mg daily.
Hydroxychloroquine
HCQ (15) is administered orally at a dosage of 400 mg daily.
Methotrexate (MTX)
MTX is given at a dose of 15 mg per week, orally or subcutaneously. Additionally, folate supplementation is administered concurrently as part of standard care, with folate 10 mg/week administered 24 hours after MTX intake.
Methotrexate
MTX (16) is given at a dose of 15 mg per week, orally or subcutaneously. Additionally, folate supplementation is administered concurrently as part of standard care, with folate 10 mg/week administered 24 hours after MTX intake.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hydroxychloroquine
HCQ (15) is administered orally at a dosage of 400 mg daily.
Methotrexate
MTX (16) is given at a dose of 15 mg per week, orally or subcutaneously. Additionally, folate supplementation is administered concurrently as part of standard care, with folate 10 mg/week administered 24 hours after MTX intake.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with LPP.
* Willingness to provide informed consent for participation in the study.
* No contraindications or known allergies to HCQ or MTX.
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to adhere to the study protocol, including medication intake, clinic visits, and questionnaire completion.
* Patients who are ineligible for the HCQ arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the MTX arm.
* Contraindications HCQ:
retinopathy and/or maculopathy
myasthenia gravis
body weight less than 35 kg
Patients who are ineligible for the MTX arm (due to contraindications), are automatically included in the HCQ arm.
\- Contraindications MTX:
Conception (both male and female) and lactation
Severe kidney or liver dysfunction (fibrosis, cirrhosis) or alcohol abuse
Bone marrow hypoplasia, immunodeficiency
Anemia, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia
Poor nutritional status (low albumin)
Hypersensitivity or allergy to MTX
Lung toxicity due to MTX or significant reduction in lung function.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
DirkJan Hijnen
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
DirkJan Hijnen, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11940
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.