To Check Comparison of Apremilast and Methotrexate Efficacy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Presented to Tertiary Care Hospital
NCT ID: NCT07337434
Last Updated: 2026-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
EARLY_PHASE1
106 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-25
2026-06-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Oral Methotrexate and Tofacitinib in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
NCT07261306
Systemic Treatment Options for Generalized Lichen Planus
NCT06739551
Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Psoriasis
NCT06032858
Methotrexate Alone vs Combination With Excimer Light in Nail Psoriasis
NCT06150794
Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Apremilast (CC-10004) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.
NCT01232283
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with moderate to severe disease were traditionally treated with methotrexate-based systemic therapy. However, its long-term safety profile concerning hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression requires periodic monitoring. Apremilast, a newer oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated moderate efficacy with a favorable safety profile but is less commonly used in developing countries due to cost and limited availability.
While multiple studies have evaluated the efficacy of both drugs individually, direct head-to-head comparisons in regional populations are lacking. Recent international trials indicate Apremilast may have a better tolerability profile but lower efficacy compared to Methotrexate.Apremilast was reported to be more effective than methotrexate (47.3% vs 21.8%) in decreasing PASI scores over 12 weeks in a recent research involving 112 individuals with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Both therapies had minor adverse effects, but Apremilast was found to be more effective.
Despite methotrexate's extensive use in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, concerns regarding its long-term safety and variable effectiveness persist. Apremilast, a newer oral agent, offers a favorable safety profile but is underutilized in resource-limited settings due to cost and limited availability. Few local studies have compared the two treatments using PASI and other standardized outcome measures to determine whether one is more effective. In light of the relative efficacy and safety of Methotrexate and Apremilast, it is imperative that Pakistani physicians have access to the findings of this trial so that they may make treatment decisions grounded in data.
Objective To compare the efficacy of methotrexate vs apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Operational Definitions
Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis:
Moderate to severe disease will be defined as PASI ≥10. Diagnosis will be confirmed by consultant dermatologist using clinical criteria and PASI tool. (Annex-A)
Efficacy:
Efficacy will be assessed based on reduction in PASI score from baseline to 12 weeks. A 75% reduction in PASI score from the baseline will be considered as primary efficacy outcome.
Null Hypothesis (H₀): When it comes to treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, there is statistically insignificant difference between Apremilast and Methotrexate.
Alternate Hypothesis (H₁): In terms of reducing PASI scores, Apremilast is statistically superior to Methotrexate for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Material and Methods
Study Design:
Randomized Control Trial
Study Setting:
Department of Dermatology, MTI-Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC), Peshawar
Duration of Study:
Six months after approval.
Sample Size: Using WHO sample size calculator, with anticipated efficacy of Methotrexate as 21.80% and Apremilast as 47.3%⁹, 95% confidence level, 80% power, the calculated sample size is 106 patients (53 in each group).
Sampling Technique:
Random Sampling
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients having age between 18-60 years of either gender Diagnosed with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PASI ≥10) No prior systemic therapy in past 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy or lactation History of liver or renal dysfunction Known hypersensitivity to study drugs
Data Collection Procedure This study will be conducted at the Department of Dermatology, MTI-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, following formal approval from the Hospital Ethical Committee and CPSP Karachi. Random sampling will be used to recruit patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria and give written informed consent. When PASI scores (Annex-A) indicate moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, a consulting dermatologist will confirm the diagnosis. After a comprehensive clinical evaluation of each participant using block randomization, eligible patients will be divided into two therapy groups: Group A, which will get 10-25 mg of methotrexate once weekly along with folic acid supplements, and Group B, which will receive 30 mg of Apremilast twice daily following dose titration. Baseline PASI scores and demographic data will be recorded on a structured data collection form. Follow-up evaluations will be scheduled at the 4th, 8th, and 12th week of therapy to assess treatment efficacy, monitor for adverse effects, and ensure compliance. PASI scoring will be repeated at each visit, and any side effects or treatment modifications will be documented accordingly. Using a pre-made proforma, all data will be recorded.
Data Analysis Procedure:
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 26.0, will be used to input and analyze the data. Age and PASI score will be examined using the Shapiro-Wilk test to check normality. Mean+SD/Median (IQR) will be used for numerical variables. Categorical variables, such as gender, treatment group, demographics and efficacy, will be summarized using frequencies and percentages. An independent samples t-test will be conducted to evaluate the treatment efficacy of the Apremilast and Methotrexate groups based on the mean reduction in PASI scores. To compare categorical variables with efficacy, a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be utilized, with a p value less than 0.05 being considered statistically .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Methotrexate
This group will recieve methotrexate 10-25mg once weekly for 3 months,
Methotrexate
Group A will recieve methotrexate 10-25mg once weekly for 3 months. Along with folic acid once daily except on day of methotrexate.
Apremilast
This group will recieve apremilast 30mg BD for 3 months.
Apremilast
Group B will recieve tablet apremilast 30mg twice daily for 3 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Methotrexate
Group A will recieve methotrexate 10-25mg once weekly for 3 months. Along with folic acid once daily except on day of methotrexate.
Apremilast
Group B will recieve tablet apremilast 30mg twice daily for 3 months.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Syeda Sana Zaman
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Syeda Sana Zaman
Training medical officer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MTI-HMC Peshawar
Peshawar, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HayatabadMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.