Concordance and Acceptability of Self-screening Versus Screening by a Healthcare Professional for HPV, a Risk Factor for Anal Cancer, by Swab in People Living With HIV

NCT ID: NCT06507917

Last Updated: 2025-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

398 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-28

Study Completion Date

2027-01-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anal canal cancers are on the increase in France, with around 2,000 new cases per year. These lesions can be detected by directed biopsies or smear tests.

The incidence rate of anal cancer is 30 times higher in people living with HIV than in the general population.

According to a recent study, the risk of anal cancer is highest in this population, but is also high in heterosexual men over 30 and women over 30. However, the proposal of a proctological examination in this population is not systematic.

In France, there is no HPV screening for people living with HIV, but there is a recommendation for proctology consultation in certain cases, notably for men who have sex with men (MSM) or for women with vaginal cervical lesions.

Several oncogenic HPV serotypes have been identified in the genesis of anal cancer. The serotype identified as the most carcinogenic is HPV-16 (89%).

This study will look at anal HPV screening in people over 30 living with HIV, thus including a population for which no screening is currently offered (heterosexual men living with HIV and women living with HIV without vaginal cervical lesions), and will assess the concordance and acceptability of self-screening versus screening by a healthcare professional as part of a comprehensive anal cancer screening strategy in this population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HPV Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

self-swabbing first

Group A self-swabbing then swabbing by a healthcare professional

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

anal swabbing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

anal swabbing

swabbing by a healthcare professional first

swabbing by a healthcare professional and then self-swabbing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

anal swabbing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

anal swabbing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

anal swabbing

anal swabbing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patient :

* living with HIV
* aged 30 or over
* resident on Reunion island and followed at the University Hospital of Reunion Island (the only follow-up center on the island)
* Able to perform anal self-sampling
* Able to answer a questionnaire
* Affiliated with or benefiting from a social security scheme
* Have given free, informed and signed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* People with a previous anal swab less than 7 days old
* Persons with a known current diagnosis of anal cancer
* Persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, minors, and persons under legal protection: guardianship or curators
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de la Réunion Recherche Clinique

Saint-Denis, , Reunion

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

CHU de la Réunion Recherche Clinique

Saint-Pierre, , Reunion

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Reunion

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lucie AUZANNEAU

Role: CONTACT

0262394999 ext. +262

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kevin DIALLO

Role: primary

Kevin DIALLO

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-A01508-39

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2024/CHU/42

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sexual Risks in Prep Users
NCT03975517 COMPLETED