Navigated Photogrammetry Compared to Standard Stereophotogrammetry
NCT ID: NCT06506747
Last Updated: 2025-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
4 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-07-20
2025-05-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* The amount of time needed to prepare the provisional digital files for use in the lab, measured in direct doctor interaction time.
* Suitability of delivered provisional occlusion.
Participants will receive either a provisional manufactured by the output of Navigated Photogrammetry, or a provisional manufactured by the output of standard stereophotogrammetry.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
New Stereophotogrammetry System to Capture Complete-arch Impression
NCT06745232
Passive Fit and Time Efficiency in All On-X Implants Protocols Using Photogrammetry, Splinted Scan Bodies, and Conventional Impression Technique
NCT07235072
Evaluating the Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation in Implant Surgery for Full Arch Prosthesis
NCT06963242
Fully Versus Partially Guided Implants Placement: Measurement of Accuracy of Implant Position and Passivity of Superstructures.
NCT07174791
Digital vs Conventional Impressions Study
NCT03146780
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Following implant surgery, the final placed implant locations will inherently have some deviation from the plan. It is important for the dentist to understand the physical location of the placed implants to achieve passive fit. In implant dentistry, a "passive fit" refers to the precise alignment and seating of prosthetic components onto dental implants without any internal stress or strain. Achieving a passive fit is crucial for the long-term success and stability of the dental prosthesis.
A potential method to obtain the final implant locations is stereophotogrammetry. Navigated Photogrammetry (NPG) is a new form of stereophotogrammetry which is inherently capable of relating the placed implants to the patient's anatomy using the registration of the Dynamic Surgical Navigation System (DSNS).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FastMap Navigated Photogrammetry
Following implant surgery, the patient will then receive a provisional that was manufactured using the data from FastMap Navigated Photogrammetry.
Navigated Photogrammetry
Navigated Photogrammetry shall be performed following implant surgery, rather than standard stereophotogrammetry. The patient will then receive a provisional that was manufactured using the data from FastMap Navigated Photogrammetry.
Standard Stereophotogrammetry
Following implant surgery, the patient will then receive a provisional that was manufactured using the data from Standard Stereophotogrammetry.
Standard Photogrammetry
The patient will receive the existing patient care protocol that includes anatomy information for the manufacturing of the provisional. Specifically, the patient will receive a preoperative IntraOral Scan (IOS) anatomy scan with IOS-compatible fiducials. Following implant surgery, the patient will receive a scan with a standard stereophotogrammetry device. Additionally, they will receive a post-op alignment IOS with IOS-compatible anatomy fiducials and IOS-compatible implant scan bodies. The patient will then receive a provisional that was manufactured using the data from the standard stereophotogrammetry device.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Navigated Photogrammetry
Navigated Photogrammetry shall be performed following implant surgery, rather than standard stereophotogrammetry. The patient will then receive a provisional that was manufactured using the data from FastMap Navigated Photogrammetry.
Standard Photogrammetry
The patient will receive the existing patient care protocol that includes anatomy information for the manufacturing of the provisional. Specifically, the patient will receive a preoperative IntraOral Scan (IOS) anatomy scan with IOS-compatible fiducials. Following implant surgery, the patient will receive a scan with a standard stereophotogrammetry device. Additionally, they will receive a post-op alignment IOS with IOS-compatible anatomy fiducials and IOS-compatible implant scan bodies. The patient will then receive a provisional that was manufactured using the data from the standard stereophotogrammetry device.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient must need at least four implants placed in one or both jaws of the maxilla or mandible.
* All patients must undergo informed consent and willingly read, understand, and accept the risks and benefits associated with the study.
* Willingness to participate for the duration of the study of at least six months follow-up
* Is healthy enough to undergo implant surgery. i.e. patient is classified by the American Society of Anesthesiology Scale (ASA) physical status classification status as ASA 1, 2 or 3.
* Ample bone to fully accommodate the implants without impinging on vital structures.
Exclusion Criteria
* Children and adolescents under 21 years of age.
* Refusal to sign informed consent.
* Less than four implants need to be restored.
* Severely immunocompromised patients
* Patients undergoing chemotherapy
* Pregnant females.
* Classified by the ASA physical status classification status as ASA \> 3,
* Patient at high risk for medication induced osteonecrosis of the jaw or any other medical condition that would preclude implant placement,
* Any systemic or local disease or condition that would compromise post healing and /or osseointegration.
* Need for systemic corticosteroids or any other medication that would compromise postoperative healing and / or osseointegration.
* Current alcohol or drug abuse.
* Inability or willingness to return for follow-up visits for the period of the study.
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
X-Nav Technologies, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Capital Center For Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and For Cosmetic Surgery
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pozzi A, Agliardi E, Lio F, Nagy K, Nardi A, Arcuri L. Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2024 Jan 16;68(1):172-180. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00251. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
Orejas-Perez J, Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Ortiz-Collado I, Thuissard IJ, Santamaria-Laorden A. In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 3;19(7):4300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074300.
Revilla-Leon M, Att W, Ozcan M, Rubenstein J. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):470-478. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 May 6.
Revilla-Leon M, Rubenstein J, Methani MM, Piedra-Cascon W, Ozcan M, Att W. Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jan;129(1):160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.019. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
Tohme H, Lawand G, Chmielewska M, Makhzoume J. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Feb;129(2):354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
Manzella C, Bignardi C, Burello V, Carossa S, Schierano G. Method to improve passive fit of frameworks on implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jul;116(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Jemt T, Hjalmarsson L. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e175-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00416.x. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:156-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1156.x.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: General principles and definitions
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DOC-002105
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.