A Comparative Study of the Results of Dynamic and OPD Static Measurement of Pupil Diameter Before and After Cataract Surgery by Pupil Detectors

NCT ID: NCT06505096

Last Updated: 2024-07-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Age-related cataract remains the leading cause of blindness in developing countries. And, with the aging of the population in these countries, the number of cataract patients will continue to grow. With accurate biological measurements and the implantation of a suitable IOL, most cataract patients can achieve good distance vision after surgery. Studies have shown differences in pupil diameter and sensitivity in patients with different refractive states, with correlations to accommodation status as well as refractive error. The pupil is an important factor to be evaluated during the selection of an artificial lens (Intraocular lens, IOL), especially a functional IOL.

Among the various instruments used for preoperative cataract biological measurements, the light source is mostly a fixed parameter, and the static pupil diameter measurement by fixed illumination light source detection as an evaluation method is relatively rough. In this study, we are going to simulate different illumination states in daily life and set up two kinds of measurement instruments, namely, OPD and binocular pupil detector, so as to obtain more realistic research results and to explore the following: 1. The static and dynamic measurement of pupil diameter by people of different refractive states in different periods of preoperative and postoperative period. 2. Whether there is a difference between the static and dynamic pupil measurement results, 2. the change of pupil size under the stimulation of different light sources, and to compare the difference between the two detection methods, to provide objective pupil indexes for the more scientific selection of functional IOLs, to provide a basis for the selection of more accurate pupil measurement methods, to accurately screen the population of the use of functional IOLs, and to improve the patient's satisfaction after the operation.

Purpose of the study To simulate the difference between the preoperative and postoperative pupil diameters of cataract patients measured by static and dynamic methods under daily illumination, to select a more accurate pupil measurement method, and to make corrections for the evaluation of preoperative biometric indexes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Orthokeratology group

-0.5D\~+0.0D

cataract surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Phaco+IOL implention

myopia group

SE lens less than -0.5D

cataract surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Phaco+IOL implention

hyperopia group

SE more than +0.5D

cataract surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Phaco+IOL implention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cataract surgery

Phaco+IOL implention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

(1) diagnosed with cataract; (2) treated with lens ultrasonic emulsification combined with monofocal IOL implantation in our hospital; (3) agreed to participate and cooperate with this study.

Exclusion Criteria

(1) acute eye disease symptoms, such as eye redness, eye pain, increased ocular secretions, etc.; (2) other eye diseases that seriously affect visual function in both eyes, such as amblyopia, high myopia, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, severe age-related macular degeneration and retinal detachment, etc.; (3) intra-operative or post-operative complications in cataract surgery; combined with other ophthalmic surgeries; and any other ophthalmic surgery for both eyes in the follow-up period; the presence of any other ophthalmic surgery in both eyes in the follow-up period. (4) Inability to understand the informed consent form and inability to communicate.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QX-2023-A-012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.