Is There a Role for Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoral Head Fractures?
NCT ID: NCT06491420
Last Updated: 2024-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-01
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty Versus Cephalo-medullary Fixation to Treat Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures
NCT05134805
Does Capsulotomy in Closed Reduction of Femoral Neck Fractures Decrease Incidence of Avascular Necrosis?
NCT06436352
Length of the Femoral Stem in Arthroplasty Done for Patients With Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesion
NCT04660591
Functional Outcome After Arthroplasty
NCT04680572
Anterior Iliopsoas Muscle Space Block Versus Supra-iliac Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05556759
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Traditionally, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or total hip replacement (THR) have been the treatment of femoral head fractures, depending on the extent of the damage and the patient's expectations. However, these procedures have some drawbacks, such as increased blood loss, infection risk, surgical trauma, and implant-related complications. Furthermore, THR might not be appropriate for young, active patients who wish to maintain their natural hip joint, whereas ORIF might not be able to adequately reduce and fixate the fracture fragments, particularly in situations of comminution or impaction.
Nevertheless, hip arthroscopy has surfaced as a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of selected femoral head fractures. Arthroscopy could be useful in femoral head fractures as it minimizes surgical aggression, in contrast to surgical hip dislocation applied in ORIF, allowing for direct control of fracture reduction, minimizing surgical morbidity, and optimizing early recovery. Hip arthroscopy allows for direct visualization and manipulation of the fracture fragments, as well as the removal of loose bodies and debris from the joint. Hip arthroscopy can also be combined with percutaneous fixation techniques to stabilize the fracture and restore joint congruence. When compared to open surgery, hip arthroscopy may offer several benefits, including shorter recovery times, less discomfort, less blood loss, and better cosmetic results. Arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation has been reported as an effective treatment in selected cases of femoral head fractures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with pipin 1 fractures fixed with arthroscopy
Accurate portal placement was essential for optimal visualization and safe access to the hip joint.
* The anterolateral, anterior, and distal lateral accessory portals were utilized for arthroscopic labral repair.
* The anterolateral portal was placed approximately 1-2 cm superior to the tip of the greater trochanter and 1-2 cm anterior, at an angle of 15° to 20° relative to the floor.
* The anterior portal was established for visualization of the posterior-superior capsule, posterior-superior labrum, posterior recess, femoral head, ligamentum teres, and other structures.
* The distal lateral accessory portal was placed after traction was released and the operative knee was flexed to 45°.
After reducing the fracture under arthroscopic guidance, a guidewire fixed the fracture a cannulated screw was passed over the wire to fix the fracture.
fixation with arthroscopy
the pipkin fracture is fixed with the help of arthroscopy and percutaneous methods.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
fixation with arthroscopy
the pipkin fracture is fixed with the help of arthroscopy and percutaneous methods.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* severe medical conditions that prevent the patient from undergoing surgery
* delayed presentation after 2 weeks from initial fracture date
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kasr El Aini Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Omar Sabry
Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kasr Al Ainy-Cairo University- Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, Manial, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MD-038-2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.