Is There a Role for Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoral Head Fractures?

NCT ID: NCT06491420

Last Updated: 2024-07-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Femoral head fractures, often caused by high-energy trauma, pose significant challenges due to complications like avascular necrosis, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, and sciatic nerve damage. While traditionally treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or total hip replacement (THR), hip arthroscopy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative that reduces surgical trauma, offers direct fracture visualization and manipulation, and may result in shorter recovery times and fewer complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Femoral head fractures are uncommon but serious injuries often happen because of high-energy trauma, such as traffic accidents or falls from heights. These fractures can result in complications such as avascular necrosis (if associated with hip dislocations), post-traumatic osteoarthritis, heterotopic ossification, and sciatic nerve damage. The management of femoral head fractures is challenging and depends on several variables, such as the fracture pattern, the degree of displacement, the existence of associated injuries, and the patient's age and physical activity.

Traditionally, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or total hip replacement (THR) have been the treatment of femoral head fractures, depending on the extent of the damage and the patient's expectations. However, these procedures have some drawbacks, such as increased blood loss, infection risk, surgical trauma, and implant-related complications. Furthermore, THR might not be appropriate for young, active patients who wish to maintain their natural hip joint, whereas ORIF might not be able to adequately reduce and fixate the fracture fragments, particularly in situations of comminution or impaction.

Nevertheless, hip arthroscopy has surfaced as a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of selected femoral head fractures. Arthroscopy could be useful in femoral head fractures as it minimizes surgical aggression, in contrast to surgical hip dislocation applied in ORIF, allowing for direct control of fracture reduction, minimizing surgical morbidity, and optimizing early recovery. Hip arthroscopy allows for direct visualization and manipulation of the fracture fragments, as well as the removal of loose bodies and debris from the joint. Hip arthroscopy can also be combined with percutaneous fixation techniques to stabilize the fracture and restore joint congruence. When compared to open surgery, hip arthroscopy may offer several benefits, including shorter recovery times, less discomfort, less blood loss, and better cosmetic results. Arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation has been reported as an effective treatment in selected cases of femoral head fractures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Femur Head Fracture Arthroscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A single limb interventional study where all cases presenting with pipkin 1 fractures are treated with arthroscopy
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with pipin 1 fractures fixed with arthroscopy

Accurate portal placement was essential for optimal visualization and safe access to the hip joint.

* The anterolateral, anterior, and distal lateral accessory portals were utilized for arthroscopic labral repair.
* The anterolateral portal was placed approximately 1-2 cm superior to the tip of the greater trochanter and 1-2 cm anterior, at an angle of 15° to 20° relative to the floor.
* The anterior portal was established for visualization of the posterior-superior capsule, posterior-superior labrum, posterior recess, femoral head, ligamentum teres, and other structures.
* The distal lateral accessory portal was placed after traction was released and the operative knee was flexed to 45°.

After reducing the fracture under arthroscopic guidance, a guidewire fixed the fracture a cannulated screw was passed over the wire to fix the fracture.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

fixation with arthroscopy

Intervention Type OTHER

the pipkin fracture is fixed with the help of arthroscopy and percutaneous methods.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fixation with arthroscopy

the pipkin fracture is fixed with the help of arthroscopy and percutaneous methods.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with pipkin 1 fractures

Exclusion Criteria

* any associated pelvic fractures
* severe medical conditions that prevent the patient from undergoing surgery
* delayed presentation after 2 weeks from initial fracture date
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kasr El Aini Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Omar Sabry

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kasr Al Ainy-Cairo University- Faculty of Medicine

Cairo, Manial, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed Hazem, MD

Role: CONTACT

+20 122 330 3789

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ahmed O Sabry, MBBS

Role: primary

+201117632926

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MD-038-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Open Reduction in Femoral Neck Fractures
NCT06872970 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA