Treatment for Diabetic Neuropathy Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT06482827
Last Updated: 2024-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2025-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimization of NIBS for Diabetic Neuropathy Neuropathic Pain
NCT03625752
tDCS and Pain Associated With Diabetic Neuropathy
NCT04306289
Electrical Stimulation in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT02082145
The Effect of Intraneural Facilitation Therapy on Diabetic Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT04025320
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) as a Treatment for Chronic Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT06171230
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A novel approach to treating neuropathy is through the induction of neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity refers to the ability of the brain to change, either through structural reorganization or functional changes in brain activation. Neuroplasticity can be induced non-invasively with a form of brain stimulation known as repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). rTMS involves an electromagnetic coil placed against the scalp that generates magnetic pulses to induce electric fields in the brain. By delivering these electric fields in rapid succession and at low intensity, functional changes in the brain (i.e. neuroplasticity) can be evoked. rTMS can be used to treat neurodegeneration, blood flow change, autonomic nervous disorders, depression, and vascular endothelial injury. rTMS can produce inhibitory or excitatory stimulation of the cerebral cortex or specific areas, leading to remodeling of the nervous system. This makes it a promising application for promoting nerve regeneration, neuroprotection, and localization of injuries. DN is closely related to cardiovascular disease as DN damages the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which controls heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). With rTMS, this damage in ANS, specifically, HR and BP, can be improved. Inhibitory stimulation can lower HR while excitatory stimulation can enhance heart rate variability. Both inhibitory and excitatory stimulation can lower BP. Thus, the use of rTMS can improve a variety of functions that could prevent further complications and possibly improve neuropathy, as well.
Inflammation is a crucial factor in the progression of DN, as it involves an increase in chemokine production, inflammatory cell infiltration in the kidney, tissue damage, and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Infiltration of inflammatory cells into the kidney can lead to diabetic kidney disease, which is the most prevalent cause of terminal renal failure globally with suboptimal treatment options. Due to the close link between DN and inflammation, reducing inflammation has been suggested as a possible therapeutic option for this population. Additionally, diabetic wounds and inflammation are also associated, therefore controlling inflammation may improve wound management and healing rates. Researchers have recently discovered that rTMS can impact the levels of inflammatory markers (such as IL-1B, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, TGF-β, CRP, SP, and BDNF) in other conditions such as depression, post-stroke, and Alzheimer's. The study by Zhao et al. investigated the effects of 20 sessions of rTMS intervention on 29 individuals diagnosed with refractory depression. Significant increases in serum BDNF levels and decreases in IL-1β and TNF-α levels were noted after one week of intervention, compared to healthy individuals, and this trend continued over the 4-week stimulation period. However, there was no change noted in the sham group. Cha et al. conducted a post-stroke study measuring the effects of 10 sessions of rTMS intervention on 10 individuals with post-stroke cognitive impairment. Following the intervention, levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β mRNA decreased. Velioglu et al. explored the effects of 10 sessions of rTMS intervention on 15 individuals with Alzheimer's Disease. An increase in BDNF levels was noted following the conclusion of the intervention. Although no studies have been done in the DN population, the use of rTMS to examine changes in these levels is promising.
The goal of the proposed research is to investigate the use of rTMS to improve the symptoms of neuropathy in patients living with diabetic neuropathy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A (Sham)
Participants in group A will take part in 4 weeks of treatment with 5 sessions per week. Each session will involve sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Sham rTMS will be delivered at 10 Hz, 2004 pulses targeting the leg representation of the primary motor cortex. Participants will hear and experience the clicking but will not be provided with any stimulation. Sham rTMS will take approximately 11.5 minutes.
Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. During the sham, participants will hear and experience the clicking from the device but will not be provided with any stimulation. The delivery of sham rTMS requires \~ 11.5 minutes in total.
Group B (Active)
Participants in group B will take part in 4 weeks of treatment with 5 sessions per week. Each session will involve real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). rTMS will be delivered at 10 Hz, 2004 pulses targeting the leg representation of the primary motor cortex. rTMS will take approximately 11.5 minutes.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. 2004 pulses will be delivered at 10 Hz stimulation. Stimulation will be delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold obtained from the right APB muscle. The delivery of rTMS requires \~ 11.5 minutes in total.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. During the sham, participants will hear and experience the clicking from the device but will not be provided with any stimulation. The delivery of sham rTMS requires \~ 11.5 minutes in total.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. 2004 pulses will be delivered at 10 Hz stimulation. Stimulation will be delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold obtained from the right APB muscle. The delivery of rTMS requires \~ 11.5 minutes in total.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Known psychological diagnosis affecting comprehension
* Inability to participate in the study
20 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aimee Nelson
Proffessor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aimee Nelson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Ader, D. N. (2007). Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S1.
Bondar, A. C., \& Popa, A. R. (2018). Diabetic Neuropathy Prevalence and Its Associated Risk Factors in Two Representative Groups of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients from Bihor County. Mædica, 13(3), 229-234.
Callaghan, B., Kerber, K., Langa, K. M., Banerjee, M., Rodgers, A., McCammon, R., Burke, J., \& Feldman, E. (2015). Longitudinal patient-oriented outcomes in neuropathy. Neurology, 85(1), 71-79.
Cha, B. et al. (2022). Therapeutic Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Prospective Pilot Study. Frontiers in Neurology, 13.
Defrin, R et al. (2007). The effect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(12), 1574-1580.
Duran-Salgado, M. B., \& Rubio-Guerra, A. F. (2014). Diabetic nephropathy and inflammation. World Journal of Diabetes, 5(3), 393-398.
Feldman, E. L., Callaghan, B. C., Pop-Busui, R., Zochodne, D. W., Wright, D. E., Bennett, D. L., Bril, V., Russell, J. W., \& Viswanathan, V. (2019). Diabetic neuropathy. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, 5(1), 42.
Ferguson, L., \& Scheman, J. (2009). Patient global impression of change scores within the context of a chronic pain rehabilitation program. The Journal of Pain, 10(4), S73.
Foglia, S. D. et al. (2022). Case report: The feasibility of rTMS with intrathecal baclofen pump for the treatment of unresolved neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 3, 893014.
Hallett, M. (2007). Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Primer. Neuron, 55(2), 187-199
Juster-Switlyk, K., \& Smith, A. G. (2016). Updates in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. F1000Research, 5, F1000 Faculty Rev-738.
Kang, B. S., Shin, H. I., \& Bang, M. S. (2009). Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the hand motor cortical area on central pain after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(10), 1766-1771.
Lee, H., Lee, J. H., Hwang, M.-H., \& Kang, N. (2023). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves cardiovascular autonomic nervous system control: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 339, 443-453.
Lim, A. K. H., \& Tesch, G. H. (2012). Inflammation in Diabetic Nephropathy. Mediators of Inflammation, 2012(1), 146154.
Pop-Busui, R., Ang, L., Holmes, C., Gallagher, K., \& Feldman, E. L. (2016). Inflammation as a Therapeutic Target for Diabetic Neuropathies. Current Diabetes Reports, 16(3), 29.
Sieberg, C. B., Taras, C., Gomaa, A., Nickerson, C., Wong, C., Ward, C., Baskozos, G., Bennett, D. L. H., Ramirez, J. D., Themistocleous, A. C., Rice, A. S. C., Shillo, P. R., Tesfaye, S., Edwards, R. R., Andrews, N. A., Berde, C., \& Costigan, M. (2018).
Vinik, A. I., Erbas, T., \& Casellini, C. M. (2013). Diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy, inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Journal of Diabetes Investigation, 4(1), 4-18.
Xu, X., \& Xu, D.-S. (2021). Prospects for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in diabetic neuropathy. Neural Regeneration Research, 16, 955.
Yang, S., Kwak, S. G., Choi, G.-S., \& Chang, M. C. (2022). Short-term Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. Pain Physician, 25(2), E203-E209.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17797
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.