3Mixtatin and MTA Vital Pulpotomy in Primary Molars

NCT ID: NCT06478940

Last Updated: 2024-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic success of using 3Mixtain versus mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomy of deeply carious Primary molars.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Due to the complexity of the root canal microbiome, it is doubtful that they can be treated properly with a single antibiotic. Accordingly, a combination of multiple antibiotics seemed to be essential to diminish different types of pathogenic bacteria. Recently, a combination of three antibiotics (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with Statins (new bio-inductive materials in regenerative dentistry) has shown promising results in primary teeth pulp therapy.

Statin components have an anti-inflammatory impact on pulp tissue by lowering the amount of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8. They also decrease osteoclastic processes and strengthen osteoblastic processes. Thus, they promote bone regeneration and dentin formation by enhancing odontoblastic activity. Several studies have shown a clinical and radiographic success rate of 3Mixtatin with inconsistent results. Some randomized controlled Trials (RCTs) showed that MTA had a comparable result with 3Mixtatin, while others reported that 3Mixtatin might be an alternative for MTA due to its higher overall success rate. 3Mixtatin is considered as a novel material with successful outcomes. Owing to limited availability of data in researches and in order to reach a conclusive results our study aims to evaluate clinical and radiographic success of using 3Mixtain versus mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomy of deeply carious Primary molars .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulp Disease, Dental Deciduous Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MTA pulpotomy

pulpotomy with MTA applied in the vital pulp therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MTA pulpotomy

Intervention Type DRUG

pulp treatment with applying MTA

3 Mixtatin pulpotomy

pulpotomy with 3 mixtatin (triple antibiotic paste of (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin mixed with simvastatin ) applied in the vital pulp therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3 mixtatin pulpotomy

Intervention Type DRUG

pulp treatment with applying 3mixture of antibiotic (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with simvastatin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3 mixtatin pulpotomy

pulp treatment with applying 3mixture of antibiotic (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with simvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

MTA pulpotomy

pulp treatment with applying MTA

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Children 4-8 years old

* Vital deeply carious primary molars.
* No history of spontaneous pain, pathologic mobility, draining sinus tract, redness or swelling of the vestibule.
* Normal gingival and periodontal condition, with no sensitivity to vestibular palpation, and no pain on percussion test.
* Patient and parent showing cooperation and compliance.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Uncooperative children to avoid time waste and attrition bias.

* Unrestorable molars
* Sign of radiolucency in periapical or furcation area
* Widening of PDL space or loss of lamina dura continuity
* Evidence of internal/external pathologic root resorption
* During operative procedure, when hemorrhage control is not achievable after pulpotomy.
* Children with systemic disease as some systemic diseases may have effect on the outcome.
* Unable to attend follow-up visits to avoid attrition bias by decreasing number of drop off cases.
* Refusal of participation as the parent of child has the authority of participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sally Ahmed Kotb

doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Randa y Abd Al Gawad, professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Yasmin M Yousry, Associate professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Assistant Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sally A kotb, PHD researcher

Role: CONTACT

00201001656502

Eslam M Mahdy

Role: CONTACT

00201143683135

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Almarji W, Laflouf M, Tolibah YA. Evaluation of the modified 3Mix-Simvastatin combination in non-instrumental endodontic therapy of necrotic primary molars: A two-arm randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Apr;10(2):e860. doi: 10.1002/cre2.860.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38433296 (View on PubMed)

Zarabadi MS, Firoozi P, Basir Shabestari S, Maleki A, Nazemi Salman B. 3Mixtatin versus MTA in pulp therapy of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Dent. 2024 Jun;25(2):111-112. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-00987-8. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38448571 (View on PubMed)

Mushtaq A, Nangia T, Goswami M. Comparative Evaluation of the Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and 3Mixtatin: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov-Dec;16(6):810-815. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2720.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38344366 (View on PubMed)

Chak RK, Singh RK, Mutyala J, Killi NK. Clinical Radiographic Evaluation of 3Mixtatin and MTA in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Randomized Controlled. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(Suppl 1):S80-S86. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2216.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35645497 (View on PubMed)

Aminabadi NA, Huang B, Samiei M, Agheli S, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. A Randomized Trial Using 3Mixtatin Compared to MTA in Primary Molars with Inflammatory Root Resorption: A Novel Endodontic Biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):95-102. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.95.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26950808 (View on PubMed)

Asl Aminabadi N, Satrab S, Najafpour E, Samiei M, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. A randomized trial of direct pulp capping in primary molars using MTA compared to 3Mixtatin: a novel pulp capping biomaterial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Jul;26(4):281-90. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12196. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26370520 (View on PubMed)

Goel N, Kumar A, Singhal R, Jha S, Namdev R, Rani R. Comparative Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Polymer Scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and Formocresol for Vital Primary Pulp Therapy: A Randomized 6-month Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):478-482. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2615.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37496952 (View on PubMed)

Jamali Z, Alavi V, Najafpour E, Aminabadi NA, Shirazi S. Randomized Controlled Trial of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars using MTA and Formocresol Compared to 3Mixtatin: A Novel Biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(5):361-366. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.5.7. Epub 2018 May 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29763354 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3Mixtatin and MTA pulpotomy

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Biodentine Versus White MTA Pulpotomy
NCT01733420 COMPLETED PHASE3