Conical Forearm and Cylindrical Upper Arm Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP) Measurements in Pregnant Patients
NCT ID: NCT06466161
Last Updated: 2025-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-29
2027-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
STUDY ENDPOINTS:
Primary Outcome Measures:
* Agreement between conical and cylindrical cuff systolic blood pressure across groups
* Agreement between conical and cylindrical cuff diastolic blood pressure across groups
Secondary Outcome Measures:
• Agreement between conical and cylindrical cuff mean arterial pressure
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-invasive Versus Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement in the Morbidly Obese Parturient With Severe Preeclampsia
NCT03222414
Hypertensive Pregnant Women Monitored by Teletransmitted Self-measurements of Blood Pressure
NCT03648645
Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension
NCT03334149
The Outcomes of Hypertension in Obese Versus Non-obese Pregnant Women
NCT05673135
Central Blood Pressure
NCT03026010
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After two minutes have elapsed since the baseline measurements, sequential, paired BP measurements will then be obtained by cycling either the upper arm cylindrical cuff or forearm conical cuff, waiting 60 seconds after the measurement, then cycling the other cuff. The choice of cuff to be cycled first (conical or cylindrical) will be block randomized. Additional sequential measurements will then be obtained 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 minutes after the first set. After the initial measurements, the upper arm cuff will automatically cycle every 15 minutes. Thus, all patients will have six sets of sequential BP measurements. Any decision to initiate antihypertensive therapy will be made by the patient's obstetrical provider, using an institutional algorithm and with reference to cylindrical cuff pressures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 Upper arm cylindrical cuff
In Group 1 the upper arm cylindrical cuff is inflated first and the blood pressure is measured.
After one minute has elapsed, the forearm conical cuff is inflated and blood pressure measured.
Upper Arm Cylindrical Blood Pressure Cuff
In Group 1, the upper arm cylindrical cuff is inflated first, followed by inflation of the forearm conical cuff.
Group 2 Forearm conical cuff
In Group 2 the forearm conical cuff is inflated first and the blood pressure is measured. After one minute has elapsed, the upper arm cylindrical cuff is inflated and blood pressure measured.
Forearm Conical Blood Pressure Cuff
In Group 2, the forearm conical cuff is inflated first, followed by inflation of the upper arm cylindrical cuff.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Upper Arm Cylindrical Blood Pressure Cuff
In Group 1, the upper arm cylindrical cuff is inflated first, followed by inflation of the forearm conical cuff.
Forearm Conical Blood Pressure Cuff
In Group 2, the forearm conical cuff is inflated first, followed by inflation of the upper arm cylindrical cuff.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Body mass index (BMI) of 20 kg/m2 or greater
* Present to Labor and Delivery with or without a diagnosis of gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or chronic hypertension with super-imposed preeclampsia, in spontaneous labor or for induction of labor
Exclusion Criteria
* History of repaired or unrepaired congenital heart disease
* History of significant arrythmia
* History of pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement
* History of sickle cell disease
* History of Raynaud's phenomenon on any extremity
* History of lymph node dissection of either upper extremity
* Patients who are less than 18 years of age
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adithya Bhat
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adithya Bhat, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prentice Women's Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):213-7. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000425667.10377.60.
Crane JM, Murphy P, Burrage L, Hutchens D. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of extreme obesity in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Jul;35(7):606-611. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30879-3.
Chu SY, Kim SY, Lau J, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, Curtis KM. Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;197(3):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.027.
Lutsiv O, Mah J, Beyene J, McDonald SD. The effects of morbid obesity on maternal and neonatal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Obes Rev. 2015 Jul;16(7):531-46. doi: 10.1111/obr.12283. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
Bicocca MJ, Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP, Sibai BM. Maternal Obesity and the Risk of Early-Onset and Late-Onset Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;136(1):118-127. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003901.
Bodnar LM, Catov JM, Klebanoff MA, Ness RB, Roberts JM. Prepregnancy body mass index and the occurrence of severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Epidemiology. 2007 Mar;18(2):234-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000254119.99660.e7.
O'Brien TE, Ray JG, Chan WS. Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview. Epidemiology. 2003 May;14(3):368-74. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200305000-00020.
Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;209(6):544.e1-544.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
Lisonkova S, Sabr Y, Mayer C, Young C, Skoll A, Joseph KS. Maternal morbidity associated with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):771-781. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000472.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):1. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003018.
Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2011-2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):366-373. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002114.
Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, Harper A, Hulbert D, Lucas S, McClure J, Millward-Sadler H, Neilson J, Nelson-Piercy C, Norman J, O'Herlihy C, Oates M, Shakespeare J, de Swiet M, Williamson C, Beale V, Knight M, Lennox C, Miller A, Parmar D, Rogers J, Springett A. Saving Mothers' Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(Suppl 1):1-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x.
Babbs CF. Oscillometric measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressures validated in a physiologic mathematical model. Biomed Eng Online. 2012 Aug 22;11:56. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-11-56.
Mauck GW, Smith CR, Geddes LA, Bourland JD. The meaning of the point of maximum oscillations in cuff pressure in the indirect measurement of blood pressure--part ii. J Biomech Eng. 1980 Feb;102(1):28-33. doi: 10.1115/1.3138195.
Palatini P, Benetti E, Fania C, Malipiero G, Saladini F. Rectangular cuffs may overestimate blood pressure in individuals with large conical arms. J Hypertens. 2012 Mar;30(3):530-6. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834f98a0.
Palatini P, Parati G. Blood pressure measurement in very obese patients: a challenging problem. J Hypertens. 2011 Mar;29(3):425-9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283435b65. No abstract available.
Kho CL, Brown MA, Ong SL, Mangos GJ. Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: the effect of arm circumference and sphygmomanometer cuff size. Obstet Med. 2009 Sep;2(3):116-20. doi: 10.1258/om.2009.090017. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
Schoenfeld A, Ziv I, Tzeel A, Ovadia J. Roll-over test--errors in interpretation, due to inaccurate blood pressure measurements. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1985 Jan;19(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(85)90161-3.
Stergiou GS, Alpert B, Mieke S, Asmar R, Atkins N, Eckert S, Frick G, Friedman B, Grassl T, Ichikawa T, Ioannidis JP, Lacy P, McManus R, Murray A, Myers M, Palatini P, Parati G, Quinn D, Sarkis J, Shennan A, Usuda T, Wang J, Wu CO, O'Brien E. A Universal Standard for the Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Collaboration Statement. Hypertension. 2018 Mar;71(3):368-374. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Palatini P, Asmar R. Cuff challenges in blood pressure measurement. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jul;20(7):1100-1103. doi: 10.1111/jch.13301.
Leblanc ME, Croteau S, Ferland A, Bussieres J, Cloutier L, Hould FS, Biertho L, Moustarah F, Marceau S, Poirier P. Blood pressure assessment in severe obesity: validation of a forearm approach. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Dec;21(12):E533-41. doi: 10.1002/oby.20458. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
Leblanc ME, Auclair A, Leclerc J, Bussieres J, Agharazii M, Hould FS, Marceau S, Brassard P, Godbout C, Grenier A, Cloutier L, Poirier P. Blood Pressure Measurement in Severely Obese Patients: Validation of the Forearm Approach in Different Arm Positions. Am J Hypertens. 2019 Jan 15;32(2):175-185. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy152.
Hersh LT, Sesing JC, Luczyk WJ, Friedman BA, Zhou S, Batchelder PB. Validation of a conical cuff on the forearm for estimating radial artery blood pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2014 Feb;19(1):38-45. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000011.
Palatini P, Benetti E, Fania C, Saladini F. Only troncoconical cuffs can provide accurate blood pressure measurements in people with severe obesity. J Hypertens. 2019 Jan;37(1):37-41. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001823.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00221793
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.