Investigating ACute HeArt FailuRe Decongestion Guided by Lung UltraSonography
NCT ID: NCT06465498
Last Updated: 2025-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
222 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-22
2026-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does this strategy shorten the length of stay and reduce early hospital readmissions?
* Does this strategy improve patients' symptoms and quality of life ?
Researchers will compare LUS to physical examination (PE).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigating Reduction of aCute heArt Failure Readmission With Lung UltraSound-preliminary Trial
NCT04174794
Lung Ultrasoung Guided Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02959372
CLUSTER-HF: Lung Ultrasound Guided Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT03613779
Usefulness of Lung Ultrasound in Ambulatory Management of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
NCT03262571
Inferior Vena CAVA and Lung UltraSound-guided Therapy in Acute Heart Failure
NCT04549701
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: To investigate the effect of a bedside LUS-guided decongestive therapy in hospitalized AHF adults on patient-centered outcomes, as compared to usual care.
Methodology: This will be a Swiss multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) aiming to recruit 222 adults hospitalized for congestive acute heart failure (AHF). Study participants will be included within the first 48 hours of their hospital arrival. Patients will be randomized to either a LUS-guided decongestive strategy or a decongestive strategy based on a structured physical examination. The primary outcome will be the number of days spent alive outside the hospital within a 40-day timeframe from study inclusion (DAOH-40). This outcome integrates length of stay, early readmission, emergency room visits, and mortality.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
1. Patients are blinded to their study arm allocation.
2. Treating physicians are blinded to the patient's study arm (both PE and POCUS arms will benefit from recommendations for decongestive therapy based on a generic congestion score).
3. Both sonographers and clinical investigators are reciprocally blinded and masked to the patient's study arm and clinical data files.
4. Outcomes adjudicators are blinded the patient's study arm
5. The biostatistician is blinded to the patients' study arm
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lung ultrasonography (LUS)
The antero-lateral thorax is examined using an 8-point protocol. Each region is coded positive in presence of ≥3 B-lines simultaneously on a frozen image or in presence of significant pleural effusion (i.e. extending over the costophrenic angle). A 4-level congestion score is defined: absence of congestion (0-1 positive points), mild congestion (2-3 positive points), moderate congestion (4-5 positive points) and severe congestion (6-8 positive points).
LUS decongestive strategy
LUS results are documented in the electronic case report form (eCRF) and converted into a common score ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion. This generic congestion score will be communicated to the treating physician by the research personnel, along with a proposal to step-up, maintain, or step-down the decongestive therapy.
Physical Examination (PE)
Congestion is clinically assessed by calculating the Everest score. This score, previously used in clinical trials, is composed of 3 congestion symptoms (i.e. dyspnea, orthopnoea and fatigue) and 3 congestion signs (i.e. jugular vein distension, lung rales, oedema), each graded from 0 to 3. From the total score, a sub-score is derived, ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion.
PE decongestive strategy
PE results are documented in the eCRF and converted into a common score ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion. This generic congestion score will be communicated to the treating physician by the research personnel, along with a proposal to step-up, maintain, or step-down the decongestive therapy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LUS decongestive strategy
LUS results are documented in the electronic case report form (eCRF) and converted into a common score ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion. This generic congestion score will be communicated to the treating physician by the research personnel, along with a proposal to step-up, maintain, or step-down the decongestive therapy.
PE decongestive strategy
PE results are documented in the eCRF and converted into a common score ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion. This generic congestion score will be communicated to the treating physician by the research personnel, along with a proposal to step-up, maintain, or step-down the decongestive therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Planned or actual admission to intermediate care units, general internal medical or cardiology wards
* Diagnosis of congestive AHF on admission chart (primary or secondary diagnosis)
* Raised value of N terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (≥1000 ng/l).
Exclusion Criteria
* Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg at the moment of inclusion
* The following conditions mimicking lung cardiogenic oedema on LUS if known at inclusion and documented: Interstitial lung disease, lung cancer or metastasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary contusion
* Known virologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in the preceding 3 months
* Unwillingness to give consent
* Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding
* Hospitalisation for palliative care and probable end-life within 30 days
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Geneva
OTHER
Antonio Leidi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Antonio Leidi
M.D., Principal Investigator, Attending physician in Internal and Emergency Medicine Services
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Geneva University Hospitals
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
Inselspital, Universitätspital
Bern, Switzerland, Switzerland
Fribourg University Hospital
Fribourg, , Switzerland
Ospedale Civico, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale
Lugano, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-00268
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.