Investigating ACute HeArt FailuRe Decongestion Guided by Lung UltraSonography

NCT ID: NCT06465498

Last Updated: 2025-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

222 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-22

Study Completion Date

2026-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether a lung ultrasonography (LUS)-guided decongestion strategy in adults hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) can improve patient-centered outcomes.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does this strategy shorten the length of stay and reduce early hospital readmissions?
* Does this strategy improve patients' symptoms and quality of life ?

Researchers will compare LUS to physical examination (PE).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Despite recent medical advances, AHF remains one of the leading causes of hospital admissions and one of the most frequent reasons for readmission. As the main reason for AHF hospitalization is congestion-driven symptoms, the cornerstone of treatment is decongestive therapy. In the absence of specific quantitative measures, however, undertreatment often occurs and is associated with an increased risk of readmission. LUS is highly accurate for detecting extravascular lung water (EVLW). It has shown clinical benefits when used to guide decongestive therapy in chronic heart failure ambulatory patients. However, data for its use in AHF inpatients are currently lacking.

Aim: To investigate the effect of a bedside LUS-guided decongestive therapy in hospitalized AHF adults on patient-centered outcomes, as compared to usual care.

Methodology: This will be a Swiss multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) aiming to recruit 222 adults hospitalized for congestive acute heart failure (AHF). Study participants will be included within the first 48 hours of their hospital arrival. Patients will be randomized to either a LUS-guided decongestive strategy or a decongestive strategy based on a structured physical examination. The primary outcome will be the number of days spent alive outside the hospital within a 40-day timeframe from study inclusion (DAOH-40). This outcome integrates length of stay, early readmission, emergency room visits, and mortality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multicentric blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
To reduce the risk of bias several levels of blinding are introduced:

1. Patients are blinded to their study arm allocation.
2. Treating physicians are blinded to the patient's study arm (both PE and POCUS arms will benefit from recommendations for decongestive therapy based on a generic congestion score).
3. Both sonographers and clinical investigators are reciprocally blinded and masked to the patient's study arm and clinical data files.
4. Outcomes adjudicators are blinded the patient's study arm
5. The biostatistician is blinded to the patients' study arm

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lung ultrasonography (LUS)

The antero-lateral thorax is examined using an 8-point protocol. Each region is coded positive in presence of ≥3 B-lines simultaneously on a frozen image or in presence of significant pleural effusion (i.e. extending over the costophrenic angle). A 4-level congestion score is defined: absence of congestion (0-1 positive points), mild congestion (2-3 positive points), moderate congestion (4-5 positive points) and severe congestion (6-8 positive points).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LUS decongestive strategy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LUS results are documented in the electronic case report form (eCRF) and converted into a common score ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion. This generic congestion score will be communicated to the treating physician by the research personnel, along with a proposal to step-up, maintain, or step-down the decongestive therapy.

Physical Examination (PE)

Congestion is clinically assessed by calculating the Everest score. This score, previously used in clinical trials, is composed of 3 congestion symptoms (i.e. dyspnea, orthopnoea and fatigue) and 3 congestion signs (i.e. jugular vein distension, lung rales, oedema), each graded from 0 to 3. From the total score, a sub-score is derived, ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PE decongestive strategy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PE results are documented in the eCRF and converted into a common score ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion. This generic congestion score will be communicated to the treating physician by the research personnel, along with a proposal to step-up, maintain, or step-down the decongestive therapy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LUS decongestive strategy

LUS results are documented in the electronic case report form (eCRF) and converted into a common score ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion. This generic congestion score will be communicated to the treating physician by the research personnel, along with a proposal to step-up, maintain, or step-down the decongestive therapy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PE decongestive strategy

PE results are documented in the eCRF and converted into a common score ranging from absence of congestion to severe congestion. This generic congestion score will be communicated to the treating physician by the research personnel, along with a proposal to step-up, maintain, or step-down the decongestive therapy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ 18 years old
* Planned or actual admission to intermediate care units, general internal medical or cardiology wards
* Diagnosis of congestive AHF on admission chart (primary or secondary diagnosis)
* Raised value of N terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (≥1000 ng/l).

Exclusion Criteria

* Known isolated right heart failure
* Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg at the moment of inclusion
* The following conditions mimicking lung cardiogenic oedema on LUS if known at inclusion and documented: Interstitial lung disease, lung cancer or metastasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary contusion
* Known virologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in the preceding 3 months
* Unwillingness to give consent
* Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding
* Hospitalisation for palliative care and probable end-life within 30 days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Antonio Leidi

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Antonio Leidi

M.D., Principal Investigator, Attending physician in Internal and Emergency Medicine Services

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Geneva University Hospitals

Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Inselspital, Universitätspital

Bern, Switzerland, Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Fribourg University Hospital

Fribourg, , Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Ospedale Civico, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale

Lugano, , Switzerland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Antonio Leidi, MD

Role: primary

+41223729101

Claudio Schneider

Role: primary

+41 31 632 21 11

Fernando Esposito

Role: primary

+41 26 306 23 64

Michele Bedulli

Role: primary

+41 91 811 76 81

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-00268

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Acute Congestive Heart Failure
NCT01885403 UNKNOWN NA