Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma Injection Compare With Corticosteroid in Pes Anserinus Pain Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT06453603
Last Updated: 2024-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study is divided into two groups: one group receiving PRP injections and the second group receiving corticosteroid injections. Treatment outcomes will be monitored at four time points: baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. The outcomes will be measured using the VAS and WOMAC scores.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Platelet Rich Plasma in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT05339542
Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT03857334
Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome
NCT00863889
Safety and Efficacy of Methylprednisolone Infiltration in Anserine Bursitis Treatment
NCT01205477
Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Platelet-rich Plasma vs Needle Tenotomy.
NCT04231357
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective : to study the efficacy of treatment between PRP injection and corticosteroid injection in patients with pes anserinus bursitis
Medhods :
A randomized controlled trial , Single blinded Participants : Patients with pes anserinus bursitis Randomization : Randomization will be performed using the software STATA 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). A various blocked randomization method
Interventions and control :
* Experimental groups : PRP injection 4 ml
* Control groups : Steroid injection , Triamcinolone acetonide(40mg/ml) 1 ml + 1%Lidocaine without adrenaline 3 ml = 4ml By Orthopedic surgeon with ultrasound guide.
Allocation and concealment :
A central randomization service will prepare sealed envelopes containing the assigned treatment for each patient.
The envelopes will be kept in secure location until Break the concealment at outpatient orthopedics department , Ramathibodi hospital
Blinding :
Randomized controlled trial study, Single blinded The assessor who will be follow up the patients, will be blinded to the group assignments.
Outcome measures:
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) , Womac scores
Follow up:
at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after injection.
Statistic analysis:
STATA 16.0, StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA Analysis Demographic data : mean, SD Mean difference in patient-relevant outcomes : Independent T- test
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PRP injection
receive pes anserinus PRP injection
PRP injection
Receive pes anserinus PRP injection
Corticosteroid injection
receive pes anserinus corticosteroid injection
corticosteroid injection
Receive pes anserinus corticosteroid injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PRP injection
Receive pes anserinus PRP injection
corticosteroid injection
Receive pes anserinus corticosteroid injection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients diagnosed with Pes Anserine Pain Syndrome
* Patients willing to participate in the research project by signing a consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with thyroid disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, or other types of knee arthritis
* Patients with abnormal blood coagulation or thrombocytopenia
* Patients who are pregnant
* Patients with any type of cancer
* Patients who cannot follow up with treatment until the end of the project
* Patients who are unwilling to participate in the project or wish to withdraw from the research project
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ramathibodi Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thaned Ekthanaporn
Doctor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Chavarat Jarungvittayakon, Assistant professor
Role: CONTACT
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kuptniratsaikul V, Rattanachaiyanont M. Validation of a modified Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index for knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Oct;26(10):1641-5. doi: 10.1007/s10067-007-0560-y. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
Yoon HS, Kim SE, Suh YR, Seo YI, Kim HA. Correlation between ultrasonographic findings and the response to corticosteroid injection in pes anserinus tendinobursitis syndrome in knee osteoarthritis patients. J Korean Med Sci. 2005 Feb;20(1):109-12. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.1.109.
Saltzman BM, Leroux T, Meyer MA, Basques BA, Chahal J, Bach BR Jr, Yanke AB, Cole BJ. The Therapeutic Effect of Intra-articular Normal Saline Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Evidence Level 1 Studies. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2647-2653. doi: 10.1177/0363546516680607. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
Subotnick SI, Sisney P. Treatment of Achilles tendinopathy in the athlete. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1986 Oct;76(10):552-7. doi: 10.7547/87507315-76-10-552. No abstract available.
Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injections and other injections for management of tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2010 Nov 20;376(9754):1751-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61160-9. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
Wong MW, Tang YY, Lee SK, Fu BS, Chan BP, Chan CK. Effect of dexamethasone on cultured human tenocytes and its reversibility by platelet-derived growth factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct;85(10):1914-20. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00008.
Liu D, Ahmet A, Ward L, Krishnamoorthy P, Mandelcorn ED, Leigh R, Brown JP, Cohen A, Kim H. A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug 15;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-30.
Han SH, An HJ, Song JY, Shin DE, Kwon YD, Shim JS, Lee SC. Effects of corticosteroid on the expressions of neuropeptide and cytokine mRNA and on tenocyte viability in lateral epicondylitis. J Inflamm (Lond). 2012 Oct 30;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-9-40.
Carofino B, Chowaniec DM, McCarthy MB, Bradley JP, Delaronde S, Beitzel K, Cote MP, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD. Corticosteroids and local anesthetics decrease positive effects of platelet-rich plasma: an in vitro study on human tendon cells. Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):711-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.09.013. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
Ahmad Z, Siddiqui N, Malik SS, Abdus-Samee M, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Rushton N. Lateral epicondylitis: a review of pathology and management. Bone Joint J. 2013 Sep;95-B(9):1158-64. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.29285.
Everts P, Onishi K, Jayaram P, Lana JF, Mautner K. Platelet-Rich Plasma: New Performance Understandings and Therapeutic Considerations in 2020. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 21;21(20):7794. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207794.
Uysal F, Akbal A, Gokmen F, Adam G, Resorlu M. Prevalence of pes anserine bursitis in symptomatic osteoarthritis patients: an ultrasonographic prospective study. Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;34(3):529-33. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2653-8. Epub 2014 May 6.
Kemp JA, Olson MA, Tao MA, Burcal CJ. Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;16(3):597-605. doi: 10.26603/001c.24148.
Gautam VK, Verma S, Batra S, Bhatnagar N, Arora S. Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis: clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015 Apr;23(1):1-5. doi: 10.1177/230949901502300101.
Ben-Nafa W, Munro W. The effect of corticosteroid versus platelet-rich plasma injection therapies for the management of lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review. SICOT J. 2018;4:11. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017062. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
Anitua E, Sanchez M, Nurden AT, Nurden P, Orive G, Andia I. New insights into and novel applications for platelet-rich fibrin therapies. Trends Biotechnol. 2006 May;24(5):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.02.010. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
pending 00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.