Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-05
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Binge Drinking And Addiction : Case-Control Study in Hospital
NCT03204214
Binge Drinking Among Youngs is a Risk Factor for Alcohol Use Disorders
NCT03062189
Efficiency of Prevention Program Dedicated to Addictive Behaviors (PREVENTURE) of Vulnerable Teenagers
NCT04599270
Alcohol and Women : Screening in General
NCT04647565
Impact of Marketing of Alcohol Products on Young People
NCT03818750
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
\- ADUC part 3) is a randomized controlled trial . The main objective of this experiment in social psychology is to validate three programs for the prevention of BD practices based on motivational interviewing (MI) associated either induced hypocrisy (IH), social identity mapping (SIM) and motivational modeling (MM) in a student environment..
Materials and Methods. This study will include 240 healthy subjects who will be students at the University of Caen Normandy. They will be people who consume alcohol, having a BD score \> 1 in the month preceding the inclusion but not presenting any specific disorder. The trial will be proposed to them by e-mail and the people who meet the inclusion criteria will join either a control group which will benefit from a MI, or an experimental group which will also benefit from a MI but which will be associated with one out of our three psycho-social interventions (IH vs. SIm vs. MM). In order to measure the effectiveness of each prevention program in terms of reducing the use of BD, a follow-up at 1 month (T1) as well as a follow-up at 6 months (T6; exploratory) will be proposed to all participants. The total duration of this research protocol is almost two years. Hypothesis tested. The aim of this work is to evaluate the interest of associating IH, SIM or MM with a motivational interview in a prevention program aiming at reducing alcohol use and the practice of BD in the student population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
2. IH condition with motivational interview avec IH program
3. SIM condition with motivational interview avec SIM program
4. MM condition with motivational interview avec MM program
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control (MI)
A motivational Interview will be conducted with participant.
motivational interviewing
motivational interviewing
IH
motivational Interview + IH task
Induced hypocrisy
Induced hypocrisy task
motivational interviewing
motivational interviewing
SIM
motivational Interview + SIM task
social identity mapping
Social identity mapping task
motivational interviewing
motivational interviewing
MM
motivational Interview + MM task
Motivational modeling
Motivational modeling task
motivational interviewing
motivational interviewing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Induced hypocrisy
Induced hypocrisy task
social identity mapping
Social identity mapping task
Motivational modeling
Motivational modeling task
motivational interviewing
motivational interviewing
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* of French mother language,
* of both sexes,
* binge drinking score \> 1,
* having signed an informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* students who declare a history of neurological, neurosurgical, psychiatric, endocrine or infectious diseases.
18 Years
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CAEN University Hospital
Caen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
23-0278
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.