Evaluating Implementation and Impact of Provincial Scale-up of the Adapted Choose to Move (CTM) Program
NCT ID: NCT06446414
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-15
2027-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating Impact and Implementation of Choose to Move (Phase 3)
NCT05497648
A "Stand Up and Move More" Intervention for Older Adults
NCT03412084
mHealth Physical Activity Intervention for Young Cancer Survivors
NCT04765241
Active Choice Intervention About Physical Activity for Physically Inactive Adults
NCT04973813
Targeted Vs Generic Print Materials on Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Young Adult Cancer Survivors
NCT05450315
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Within CTM (Phase 4), trained activity coaches support older adults in two ways. First, in a one-on-one consultation, activity coaches help participants to set goals and create action plans for physical activity tailored to each person's interests and abilities. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. Second, activity coaches facilitate 8 group meetings with small groups of participants.
In this study, the central support unit (CSU) will work with community-based seniors' services (CBSS) organizations across BC to adapt the CTM Phase 4 program to 'best fit' the population of underserved older adults they serve, and build capacity in these organizations to deliver CTM. The investigators will then evaluate the implementation of the adapted programs, and the impact of the adapted programs on older adults' physical and social health.
Objectives:
1. To assess whether CTM (adapted Phase 4) was implemented as planned (fidelity) and investigate factors that support or inhibit its implementation at scale across BC (Part I - Implementation Evaluation).
2. To assess the impact (effectiveness) of CTM (adapted Phase 4) on the physical activity, mobility, and social connectedness of older adult participants (Part II - Impact Evaluation).
Study Design:
The investigators use a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation (Curran et al. 2012) pre-post study design to evaluate the adapted CTM Phase 4 program. The investigators use mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) and collect data at 0 (baseline) and 3 (post-intervention) months to assess implementation and impact of CTM.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Choose to Move
CTM (adapted Phase 4) is a 3-month, flexible, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults. CTM includes:
1-on-1 Consultation: Participants meet 1-on-1 with their activity coach at the start of the program to set goals and develop a physical activity action plan tailored to their abilities, interests and resources. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities.
Group Meetings: Participants will attend eight, 1-hour group-based meetings (max of 15 participants) led by an activity coach. Meetings cover a health-related discussion topic and provide time for social connection among participants. Meetings can be held online or in-person.
Community-based seniors' services organizations that deliver CTM may adapt the program (e.g., deliver in a different language, adapt for cultural or geographical factors) to fit the needs of the older adults they serve but the two components listed above will be retained.
Choose to Move
As described under study arm description
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Choose to Move
As described under study arm description
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Activity coach hired by delivery partner organization (activity coaches must speak English to participate in the evaluation);
* English-speaking older adults (aged \>=50 years) who participate in CTM (recruited by delivery partner organizations) will be invited to participate in the evaluation;
* Punjabi-speaking older adults will also be invited to participate in the evaluation if they can read English or Punjabi and/or if the activity coach or a member of the research team has the necessary language skills to ensure effective communication of the Punjabi language translated consent form and surveys.
Exclusion Criteria
* CTM participants \< 50 years
* CTM participants who do not speak either English or Punjabi
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)
OTHER_GOV
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Heather McKay
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Heather McKay, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Joanie Sims Gould, MSW, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Active Aging Research Team, Robert H. N. Ho Research Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
Milton K, Bull FC, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):203-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395. Epub 2010 May 19.
Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.
Macdonald HM, Nettlefold L, Bauman A, Sims-Gould J, McKay HA. Pragmatic Evaluation of Older Adults' Physical Activity in Scale-Up Studies: Is the Single-Item Measure a Reasonable Option? J Aging Phys Act. 2022 Feb 1;30(1):25-32. doi: 10.1123/japa.2020-0412. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
Simonsick EM, Newman AB, Visser M, Goodpaster B, Kritchevsky SB, Rubin S, Nevitt MC, Harris TB; Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Mobility limitation in self-described well-functioning older adults: importance of endurance walk testing. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Aug;63(8):841-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.8.841.
Veroff JB. The dynamics of help-seeking in men and women: a national survey study. Psychiatry. 1981 Aug;44(3):189-200.
Bauer GR, Braimoh J, Scheim AI, Dharma C. Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations. PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178043. eCollection 2017.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
McKay H, Naylor PJ, Lau E, Gray SM, Wolfenden L, Milat A, Bauman A, Race D, Nettlefold L, Sims-Gould J. Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: an evaluation roadmap. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 7;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4.
Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 19;4:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67.
Subedi R, Aitken N, Greenberg L. Canadian Social Environment Typology User Guide. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2022.
Scaccia JP, Cook BS, Lamont A, Wandersman A, Castellow J, Katz J, Beidas RS. A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R = MC2. J Community Psychol. 2015 Apr;43(4):484-501. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21698. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
Miller CJ, Barnett ML, Baumann AA, Gutner CA, Wiltsey-Stirman S. The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 7;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3.
Wiltsey Stirman S, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Choose to Move website
Active Aging Research Team website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2223-HQ-000373
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
H23-00199
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.