Smartwatch Paroxysmal Arrhythmia Detection Compared with Holter

NCT ID: NCT06425887

Last Updated: 2024-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

185 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation, the commonest sustained arrhythmia in adults, is estimated to be 24%-27% for individuals of 40 years or older. Previous work showed that annual new diagnosis of AF is 11000-26000 in Hong Kong. Other arrhythmia such as supraventricular arrhythmia or premature beats were also common and of clinical significance.

12-lead ECG is a first line investigation for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, but it has a low diagnostic yield with its 10-30 seconds recordings. 24-hour Holter exam is the usual next step of diagnosis. The diagnostic yield of Holter varies according to indication but is generally low at 1%-12%. This is because paroxysmal arrhythmia may not happen every day. In addition, even if arrhythmia is picked up in Holter, patient may not register the symptom, making the symptom arrhythmia correlation problematic.

Despite limitations, the demand for Holter exam is still high. In Prince of Wales Hospital, a tertiary referral centre with a catchment of about 1 million populations, the waiting time for a routine Holter exam is 3 years.

Smartwatch has gained popularity over past years as an adjunct to smartphone. Latest generations of smartwatch were equipped with wearer-initiated ECG rhythm strip recording capabilities. Smartwatch has evolved to become a health tracker with arrhythmia detection capabilities. It was found to be a useful tool for atrial fibrillation screening in general population. Other arrhythmias, such as supraventricular tachycardia, premature beats, and abnormal ECG patterns associated with sudden cardiac death could also be detected with smartwatch ECG recordings. Apple Heart study was the largest study utilizing smartwatch for arrhythmia detection. The general population was screened for atrial fibrillation using irregular pulse algorithm. The study found a 84% concordance rate between irregular pulse notification and ECG patches.

Therefore, investigators propose to conduct a study to compare its diagnostic yield with Holter, in patients with suspected arrhythmia and see if smartwatch recording following a systematic protocol for four-weeks will have better arrhythmia diagnosis yield than a 24-hour Holter exam.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arrythmia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Smart watch

not interventional

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. All patients referred for out-patient Holter exam from age 18 - 80 years old
2. The following indications for Holter exam will be allowed for recruitment

* Palpitation
* Pre-syncope
* Dizziness

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with a prior ECG diagnosis to explain the symptom
2. Primary symptom is syncope
3. Patient who has no clear indication for Holter exam
4. Pregnant ladies
5. Patients who failed to make a successful recording despite teaching attempts.
6. Patients who cannot read English or Chinese version of consent.
7. Anticipation of non-compliance with recording protocol.
8. Patients who do not have a compatible smart phone (Android 9.0 or newer, or iOS15 or newer)
9. Patients under custody
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tam Tsz Kin

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tsz Kin Mark Tam

Role: CONTACT

852 35051750

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tammy Yeung

Role: primary

852 35051750

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Smartwatch vs Holter study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Apple Heart & Movement Study
NCT04198194 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING