Smartwatch Paroxysmal Arrhythmia Detection Compared with Holter
NCT ID: NCT06425887
Last Updated: 2024-10-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
185 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-07-01
2026-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
12-lead ECG is a first line investigation for patients with suspected paroxysmal arrhythmia, but it has a low diagnostic yield with its 10-30 seconds recordings. 24-hour Holter exam is the usual next step of diagnosis. The diagnostic yield of Holter varies according to indication but is generally low at 1%-12%. This is because paroxysmal arrhythmia may not happen every day. In addition, even if arrhythmia is picked up in Holter, patient may not register the symptom, making the symptom arrhythmia correlation problematic.
Despite limitations, the demand for Holter exam is still high. In Prince of Wales Hospital, a tertiary referral centre with a catchment of about 1 million populations, the waiting time for a routine Holter exam is 3 years.
Smartwatch has gained popularity over past years as an adjunct to smartphone. Latest generations of smartwatch were equipped with wearer-initiated ECG rhythm strip recording capabilities. Smartwatch has evolved to become a health tracker with arrhythmia detection capabilities. It was found to be a useful tool for atrial fibrillation screening in general population. Other arrhythmias, such as supraventricular tachycardia, premature beats, and abnormal ECG patterns associated with sudden cardiac death could also be detected with smartwatch ECG recordings. Apple Heart study was the largest study utilizing smartwatch for arrhythmia detection. The general population was screened for atrial fibrillation using irregular pulse algorithm. The study found a 84% concordance rate between irregular pulse notification and ECG patches.
Therefore, investigators propose to conduct a study to compare its diagnostic yield with Holter, in patients with suspected arrhythmia and see if smartwatch recording following a systematic protocol for four-weeks will have better arrhythmia diagnosis yield than a 24-hour Holter exam.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Wearable Assessment of Thoracic, Cardiac Health and Exercise Performance Trial
NCT06671171
Accuracy of Rhythm Detection by a Wearable Smart Watch for Cardiac Arrhythmias (The WATCH-RHYTHM Study)
NCT04499807
Detection and Quantification of Atrial Fibrillation in High-risk Patients Using a Smartwatch Wearable (Apple Watch)
NCT05686330
Automated Diagnostic Performance of Smartwatch ECG for Arrhythmia Detection Using the PulseAI Neural Network.
NCT05668377
Comparison of QT Interval Readings Between Smartwatch Combined With Cardiologs Artificial Intelligence and 12-lead ECG
NCT05161065
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Smart watch
not interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The following indications for Holter exam will be allowed for recruitment
* Palpitation
* Pre-syncope
* Dizziness
Exclusion Criteria
2. Primary symptom is syncope
3. Patient who has no clear indication for Holter exam
4. Pregnant ladies
5. Patients who failed to make a successful recording despite teaching attempts.
6. Patients who cannot read English or Chinese version of consent.
7. Anticipation of non-compliance with recording protocol.
8. Patients who do not have a compatible smart phone (Android 9.0 or newer, or iOS15 or newer)
9. Patients under custody
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tam Tsz Kin
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Smartwatch vs Holter study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.