Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection Returning to Work After Discharge:a Cross-sectional Survey

NCT ID: NCT06418828

Last Updated: 2024-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

178 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study wants to understand the incidence of returning to work after discharge in patients with type B aortic dissection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The incidence of aortic dissection in China is increasing year by year. According to the latest research report, the annual incidence of aortic dissection in China is 5 \~ 10 / 100,000, the average age of patients is 51.8 years old, and the age of disease is about 10 years younger than that of European and American countries. RTW after discharge is a measure of disease recovery and recovery to normal state. There are only reports on RTW after discharge in the fields of cancer, stroke, organ transplantation, maintenance peritoneal dialysis and so on. Most of the existing literature in the cardiovascular field at home and abroad focuses on assessing the status of RTW and RRTW after discharge. Up to now, there is still a lack of research on the promotion and hindrance factors of RTW in TBAD patients, the status survey of post-RTW work ability and the related nomogram prediction model. Therefore, based on the Meleis transformation theory, this study aims to investigate the current status of return to work of TBAD patients at 6 months after discharge through quantitative and qualitative research, and to explore its influencing factors in depth. Based on the previous results, the RTW visual prediction model of TBAD patients was constructed, which provided a theoretical basis for the formulation and implementation of early intervention by medical staff, and further improved the research in this field.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type B Aortic Dissection Return to Work

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Return to work group

Asked whether the patient returned to work, if the patient returned to work, included in this group.

return to work

Intervention Type OTHER

Ask patients if they are going back to work

Non-return to work group

Ask whether the patient returned to work, if the patient did not return to work, included in this group.

return to work

Intervention Type OTHER

Ask patients if they are going back to work

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

return to work

Ask patients if they are going back to work

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

( 1 ) TBAD was diagnosed by computed tomography angiography ( CTA ) or magnetic resonance angiography ( MRA ) ; ( 2 ) 18 years ≤ age \< 60 years at diagnosis ; ( 3 ) having full-time or part-time job at the time of diagnosis ; ( 4 ) TBAD patients were discharged after successful treatment and the discharge time was ≥ 6 months ;

Exclusion Criteria

( 1 ) reaching the retirement age 6 months after discharge ; ( 2 ) those with disturbance of consciousness, mental illness, inability to complete the interview independently or under the guidance of the researcher ; ( 3 ) Participate in other related research ; ( 4 ) Clinical end-stage or receiving palliative treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yanjuan Lin, MD

Role: CONTACT

+86 591 8621 8336

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yanjuan Lin, MD

Role: primary

+86 591 8621 8336

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024KY049

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.