Inter-observer Reliability of the TRiP(Cast) Score in Patients With Trauma to a Lower Limb Requiring Immobilisation
NCT ID: NCT06416280
Last Updated: 2024-05-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
302 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-16
2025-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Screening for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Intensive Care
NCT06246604
Tourniquets Type Combat Application Tourniquet: Proximal or Distal Location, Simple or Staggered on Upper and Lower Limb
NCT03218176
Utility of Point-of-care Device for Rapid Determination of Cogulopathy in Trauma Patients
NCT02869737
Detection and Management of Non-Compressible Hemorrhage by Vena Cava Ultrasonography
NCT01989273
HEMOTOL: Efficacy and Safety of Hemodialysis On-line Monitoring Devices on Hemodynamic Stability in Intensive Care Unit
NCT00811109
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the CASTING study (randomised stepped-wedge trial), patients not receiving thromboprophylaxis on the basis of a TRiP(cast) score \<7 had a 3-month rate of symptomatic thromboembolic events of 0.70% (95% CI: 0.21-1.17). Use of the TRiP(cast) score reduced the rate of anticoagulation prescriptions by 26% (24.5% versus 50.4%) without increasing the rate of thromboembolic events at 3 months. Since this study, French recommendations concerning the prescription of anticoagulation treatments have been updated.
Since this study, French recommendations concerning the prescription of preventive anticoagulant treatment have been updated by the SFMU (French Society of Emergency Medicine) and the SFMV (French Society of Vascular Medicine). They were presented in June 2023 and are now applied in all emergency facilities. During the review for the publication of the CASTING study, it was discussed whether it would be useful to evaluate the reliability of this score.
However, the reliability of the measurement and the reproducibility of the score have never been assessed. Given the importance of assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with lower-limb trauma when deciding whether or not to prescribe thromboprophylaxis, this assessment is essential.
Although this score appears to be objective, there are still items where interpretation may be different. For example, the type of immobilisation cannot be transposed perfectly to all existing immobilisation methods. This study will also be carried out in other European countries. The types of immobilisation vary considerably from one country to another, and the interpretation of certain items could be different. The interpretation of patient characteristics may also vary.
Furthermore, this score has never been compared with the clinician's implicit "gestalt" probability, which is used to define patients at risk of venous thromboembolic events.
It is a real challenge when implementing scores to assess their added value compared with clinical intuition. The use of scores has an initial educational objective, but it is important to know whether clinical intuition would be sufficient to assess this venous thromboembolic risk.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the inter-observer reliability of the assessment of venous thromboembolic risk using the TRiP(cast) score in patients presenting with trauma to a lower limb requiring immobilisation, and of the clinicians' assessment using the physician's implicit probability (gestalt) compared with the use of the TRiP(cast) score.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Assessment of the TRiP(cast) score
In patients presenting to the emergency department with trauma to a lower limb, the TRiP(cast) score is assessed in accordance with the recommendations. If the patient does not object. The attending physician will then be asked to fill in his implicit assessment of the risk of venous thromboembolism on a paper CRF and then to complete his assessment of the TRiP(cast) score. He will then be free to decide whether or not to anticoagulate the patient.
At the same time, a doctor not involved in the patient's care will assess the TRiP(cast) score and record it on a paper CRF. The second doctor's assessment will be independent and will have no impact on the patient's management.
The CRFs will then be analysed and stored. Data will be anonymised during data collection and each patient will be assigned an anonymity number.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Isolated trauma to a lower limb,
* Rigid immobilisation (plaster or resin) or semi-rigid immobilisation for an expected duration of at least 7 days,
* Patient over 18 years of age,
* Patient affiliated to or benefiting from a social security scheme,
* Patients who have signed a prior informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Trauma requiring hospitalisation for more than 48 hours,
* Pregnant, breast-feeding or parturient patients,
* Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision,
* Patient under compulsory psychiatric care,
* Patient under legal protection,
* Patients unable to give their free and informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Angers
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Delphine DOUILLET
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Angers
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
DOUILLET Delphine
Angers, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24_0131
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.