The Efficacy and Mechanism of SMA+M1 Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Freezing of Gait in PD

NCT ID: NCT06415682

Last Updated: 2025-05-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-08

Study Completion Date

2025-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a double-blinded randomized study examining the efficacy of the double-site (M1+SMA) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Freezing of Gait (FOG) in patients with Parkinson's disease. The investigators hypothesize that treatment using magnetic stimulation on double site (including M1-LL and SMA) will improve FOG and gait symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients in the double-site group underwent ten sessions of double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg and supplementary motor area, whereas patients in the single-site group underwent ten sessions of single-site active magnetic stimulation with high frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg. In addition, patients in the sham group underwent 10 sessions of sham rTMS on bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg. Assessments of FOG severity, gait, motor symptoms, excitability of cortex motor (using transcranial magnetic stimulation), plasma indicators and multimodal magnetic resonance were performed three times: at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg and SMA

Patients in the Experimental group underwent ten sessions of double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg and SMA.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SMA+M1 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The M1 stimulation session consisted 40 trains of 10-Hz rTMS with the protocol of 5s train session and 25s intertrain intervals. There were 4000 pulses per day for M1-LL (unilateral stimulation 2000 pulses). For SMA stimulation, a 5s burst of 10Hz rTMS was repeated 20 times (1000 pulse, 20 minutes' duration).

Patients in the Experimental group underwent ten sessions of double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex (M1) of the lower leg and supplementary motor area (SMA).

single-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg

Patients in the Active Comparator group underwent ten sessions of single-site active magnetic stimulation with high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

M1 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The M1 stimulation session consisted 40 trains of 10-Hz rTMS with the protocol of 5s train session and 25s intertrain intervals. There were 4000 pulses per day for M1-LL (unilateral stimulation 2000 pulses). Patients in the Active Comparator group underwent ten sessions of single-site active magnetic stimulation with high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg.

sham magnetic stimulation on the bilateral M1 of the lower leg

Patients in the Sham Comparator group underwent ten sessions of double sham rTMS on the bilateral M1 of the lower leg.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients in the Sham Comparator group underwent 10 sessions of double sham rTMS on M1 of the lower leg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SMA+M1 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

The M1 stimulation session consisted 40 trains of 10-Hz rTMS with the protocol of 5s train session and 25s intertrain intervals. There were 4000 pulses per day for M1-LL (unilateral stimulation 2000 pulses). For SMA stimulation, a 5s burst of 10Hz rTMS was repeated 20 times (1000 pulse, 20 minutes' duration).

Patients in the Experimental group underwent ten sessions of double-site high frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex (M1) of the lower leg and supplementary motor area (SMA).

Intervention Type DEVICE

M1 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

The M1 stimulation session consisted 40 trains of 10-Hz rTMS with the protocol of 5s train session and 25s intertrain intervals. There were 4000 pulses per day for M1-LL (unilateral stimulation 2000 pulses). Patients in the Active Comparator group underwent ten sessions of single-site active magnetic stimulation with high frequency rTMS over the bilateral M1 of the lower leg.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Patients in the Sham Comparator group underwent 10 sessions of double sham rTMS on M1 of the lower leg.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. aged between 40-80 years;
2. diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria;
3. patients were stable on dopaminergic treatment for at least 3 months;
4. Item 3 of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire(FOG-Q) scored ≥1;
5. Patients experienced FOG during an interview.

Exclusion Criteria

1. comorbidities of major neurologic diseases other than PD;
2. suffer from musculoskeletal disorders that could have interfered with their ability to walk;
3. presence of contraindications for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
4. marked tremor interfered with TMS detection;
5. previously receiving any kinds of TMS interventions;
6. severe cognitive impairment making cooperation impossible \[Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) \< 24\];
7. were unable to walk independently during the OFF state.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kezhong Zhang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-SR-290

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain-Machine Interface for Freezing of Gait
NCT06642519 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA