Body Surface Gastric Mapping Vs Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy on Clinical Management in Gastroparesis

NCT ID: NCT06411574

Last Updated: 2025-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-03

Study Completion Date

2026-12-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastroparesis is a chronic and debilitating gastric disease associated with poor quality of life, psychological distress, frequent hospitalisations, and high healthcare utilization and associated costs. It is defined by persistent upper gastrointestinal symptoms and delayed gastric emptying with no mechanical gastric outlet obstruction. Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is the current gold standard for diagnosing gastroparesis but its clinical utility is currently being questioned. Current management strategies have often been found to be ineffective, largely due to an incomplete understanding of the disease's pathophysiology. There is a critical need for more advanced diagnostic testing that can better diagnose patients and guide personalized targeted therapy.

Body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) using Gastric Alimetry (Alimetry Ltd., New Zealand) is a new FDA-cleared medical device to assess gastric function by non-invasively assessing gastric motility using simultaneous high-resolution electrogastrography and symptom profiling. BSGM has demonstrated clinical utility in the assessment of gastric function through patient phenotyping in a variety of cohorts, including patients with nausea and vomiting disorders, diabetes, delayed gastric emptying, and post-gastric surgery. Previous research revealed that the detection of gastric motility abnormality rates through patient phenotyping were higher using Gastric Alimetry compared to GES (43% vs 23%). Clinical application of these phenotypes has also aided in changing management decisions, which reduced healthcare utilization and associated costs. However, how GES and BSGM test results differentially influence clinical management in patients is uncertain.

This exploratory pilot study proposes a two-arm, prospective trial to assess whether BSGM-guided care could change clinical outcomes compared to the standard of care (GES) in patients with suspected gastroparesis. The trial consists of two phases. Phase 1 involves participants separately undertaking a GES and BSGM test. Based on these results, the referring clinician will devise management plans for treatment using a standardized form: 1) unblinded to one test (GES or BSGM) but blinded to the other test; and 2) unblinded to both tests (GES + BSGM). They will be asked to recommend any changes to interventions (medications, diet, endoscopic/surgical referral or other) and additional testing. In phase 2, those in Phase 1 will undergo BSGM-guided care based on their combined management plan (GES + BSGM) and followed up over a 12 month period. A separate set of participants will be recruited to undergo standard of care (GES only) in parallel with Phase 1 participants. After 12 months, those on the standard of care arm will be crossed over to BSGM-guided care, undergo a BSGM test, treated according to the new management plan, and followed up over 6 months. Questionnaires will assess symptoms, quality of life, health psychology, sleep, and work impact.

If validated, this may change clinical practice by reducing the need for invasive or radioactive-based procedures to diagnose these patients and facilitating a more targeted treatment approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroparesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be recruited into one of two groups: standard of care (GES only) or BSGM-guided care (GES + BSGM). Each group will undergo treatment based on their respective management plan.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of care

Only the GES test result will be used to guide treatment as part of standard of care.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

BSGM-guided care

Both the GES and BSGM test results will be used to guide treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gastric Alimetry

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Gastric Alimetry™ System is intended to record, store, view and process gastric myoelectrical activity as an aid in the diagnosis of various gastric disorders.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gastric Alimetry

The Gastric Alimetry™ System is intended to record, store, view and process gastric myoelectrical activity as an aid in the diagnosis of various gastric disorders.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged over 18 years old
* Meeting Rome IV Criteria for Functional Dyspepsia and/or Chronic Nausea and Vomiting Syndrome
* Referred for gastric emptying scintigraphy
* Normal gastroscopy
* Negative or treated H. Pylori status

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or breast-feeding
* Inability to perform a BSGM test according to Indications for Use: history of severe skin allergies or sensitivity to cosmetics or lotions; chronically damaged or vulnerable epigastric skin (fragile skin, wounds, inflammation); unable to remain in a relaxed reclined position for the test duration.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Auckland, New Zealand

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Western Sydney

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Vincent Ho

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vincent Ho, MBBS, FRACP, FACP, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western Sydney University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Western Sydney University

Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Daphne Foong, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+61 2 4634 4579

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Daphne Foong, PhD

Role: primary

+61 2 4634 4579

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gharibans AA, Calder S, Varghese C, Waite S, Schamberg G, Daker C, Du P, Alighaleh S, Carson D, Woodhead J, Farrugia G, Windsor JA, Andrews CN, O'Grady G. Gastric dysfunction in patients with chronic nausea and vomiting syndromes defined by a noninvasive gastric mapping device. Sci Transl Med. 2022 Sep 21;14(663):eabq3544. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abq3544. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36130019 (View on PubMed)

Varghese C, Schamberg G, Calder S, Waite S, Carson D, Foong D, Wang WJ, Ho V, Woodhead J, Daker C, Xu W, Du P, Abell TL, Parkman HP, Tack J, Andrews CN, O'Grady G, Gharibans AA. Normative Values for Body Surface Gastric Mapping Evaluations of Gastric Motility Using Gastric Alimetry: Spectral Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 1;118(6):1047-1057. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002077. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36534985 (View on PubMed)

Wang WJ, Foong D, Calder S, Schamberg G, Varghese C, Tack J, Xu W, Daker C, Carson D, Waite S, Hayes T, Du P, Abell TL, Parkman HP, Huang IH, Fernandes V, Andrews CN, Gharibans AA, Ho V, O'Grady G. Gastric Alimetry Expands Patient Phenotyping in Gastroduodenal Disorders Compared with Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 1;119(2):331-341. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002528. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37782524 (View on PubMed)

Varghese C, Daker C, Lim A, Sebaratnam G, Xu W, Kean B, Cederwall C. Gastric Alimetry in the Management of Chronic Gastroduodenal Disorders: Impact to Diagnosis and Health Care Utilization. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 1;14(11):e00626. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000626.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37589479 (View on PubMed)

Varghese C, Xu W, Daker C, Bissett IP, Cederwall C. Clinical utility of Gastric Alimetry® in the management of intestinal failure patients with possible underlying gut motility disorders. Clinical Nutrition Open Science [Internet]. 2023 Oct 1;51:15-25. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268523000359.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Xu W, Gharibans AA, Calder S, Schamberg G, Walters A, Jang J, Varghese C, Carson D, Daker C, Waite S, Andrews CN, Cundy T, O'Grady G. Defining and Phenotyping Gastric Abnormalities in Long-Term Type 1 Diabetes Using a Novel Body Surface Gastric Mapping Device. Gastro Hep Adv. 2023 Aug 18;2(8):1120-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.08.005. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39131562 (View on PubMed)

Xu W, Wang T, Foong D, Schamberg G, Evennett N, Beban G, Gharibans A, Calder S, Daker C, Ho V, O'Grady G. Characterization of gastric dysfunction after fundoplication using body surface gastric mapping. J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Mar;28(3):236-245. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2023.12.023. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38445915 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WS-GMSC-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nutritional Drink in Gastroparesis
NCT03500354 WITHDRAWN NA
Gastroparesis Registry 3
NCT03680859 COMPLETED