Aspiration Pneumonia in Cerebrovascular Stroke Patients Suffering from Bulbar Palsy

NCT ID: NCT06395740

Last Updated: 2025-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-05

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

One of the most serious complications in the critically ill patient complaining of bulbar palsy is aspiration pneumonia. These patients are scheduled for nasogastric tube feeding trying to avoid recurrent aspiration and subsequent aspiration pneumonia. Even though, the risk of aspiration is still present. Putting a total parenteral nutrition regimen for these patients is a supposed strategy to avoid aspiration pneumonia till recovery from bulbar palsy or planning for tracheostomy and or feeding gastrostomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aspiration pneumonia in cerebrovascular patients suffering from bulbar palsy can reach up to 60 %. (Martino R et al., 2012). All swallowing stages can be affected in cerebrovascular stroke patients. Difficulty in deglutition lower oesophageal sphincter dysfunction, delayed gastric empty and subsequent increase in gastric residual volume and decreased lower oesophageal sphincter tone and subsequent increase in gastroesophageal reflux all can be found in patients suffering from cerebrovascular stroke. (Schaller BJ et al., 2006).

As enteral feeding via oral route is risky in patients suffering from bulbar palsy, nasogastric tube is being used as a mode of enteral feeding till recovery from bulbar palsy or doing a gastrostomy tube as an alternative mode for enteral feeding. There is no survival benefit for early enteral feeding via nasogastric tube when compared with delayed tube feeding as formulated by the Feed or Ordinary Diet (FOOD) trial and suggested delaying nasogastric feeding may decrease mortality in bulbar palsy patients (Dennis MS et al., 2005).

Although this is the common practice to get the nutritional needs, there is evidence that early enteral feeding is not nutritionally superior to early TPN administration. Moreover, there is more rapid recovery of both albumin and protein in patients started TPN rather than those of enteral feeding at least for the first 2 weeks of stroke which is the time of maximum risk of malnutrition (Yamada SM, 2015).

Bulbar palsy non ventilated cerebrovascular patients who are scheduled for nasogastric tube feeding are at a high risk of aspiration pneumonia, with incidence from 33% to 70% (Langdon PC et al., 2009). Dysfunction of Lower oesophageal sphincter is exaggerated by nasogastric tube, that means increase of incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and micro aspiration (Gomes GF., 2003). Also, nasogastric tube can be colonized by gram negative bacteria as nasogastric tube change gastric acidity and promote bacterial colonization and increasing risk of micro aspiration and sequent aspiration pneumonia (Spilker CA et al., 1996). So non ventilated cerebrovascular stroke patients suffering from bulbar palsy and scheduled for nasogastric tube enteral feeding are at risk of aspiration pneumonia (Warusevitane A et al., 2014).

Even though parenteral feeding has the advantage of protection from aspiration pneumonia, it has risk of complications like hyperglycaemia, refeeding-syndrome, bone demineralisation, catheter infections), fortunately these complications can be minimised by carefully monitoring patients and the use of teams for nutrition support especially during long-term PN.( Hartl WH et al., 2009)

Our goal in this study is to compare the incidence of aspiration pneumonia when keeping patients on total parenteral feeding regimen in comparison with early start of enteral feeding with nasogastric tube during early stage of stroke in stroke patients suffering from bulbar palsy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aspiration Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All participants are to be resuscitated at first and second days of admission keeping all of them NPO then to be randomly divided according to the method of obtaining their nutritional needs into two groups. Energy target will be set at 30 kcal/ kg IBW in males and 25 Kcal/kg IBW in females, while protein requirements will be set at 1.2 g/kg IBW

First group (group A):

Group A patients will be scheduled for continuation of NPO strategy except for medications to be given via nasogastric tube till 14 days from day of stroke with fulfilment of nutrition requirement by parenteral route guided by Aspen2020 guidelines.

Second group (group B):

Group B patients will be scheduled for enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

enteral nutrition group

patients will be scheduled for enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube.The amount of nasogastric feed given each day will be calculated according to the patient's calorie requirement and administered as 100 ml nasogastric tube feeding every four hours escalating to 200 ml every four hours according to patients' toleration and caloric needs. Patients will be positioned at ≥ 45° head-end elevation during feeds. They will be observed regularly during feeds, and the position of the nasogastric tube will be confirmed before each feed by auscultation by stethoscope.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Enteral nutrtion

Intervention Type OTHER

enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube.

total parentral nutrition group

patients will be scheduled for continuation of NPO strategy except for medications to be given via nasogastric tube till 14 days from day of stroke with fulfilment of nutrition requirement by parenteral route

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TPN

Intervention Type OTHER

of NPO strategy except for medications to be given via nasogastric tube till 14 days from day of stroke with fulfilment of nutrition requirement by parenteral route

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enteral nutrtion

enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube.

Intervention Type OTHER

TPN

of NPO strategy except for medications to be given via nasogastric tube till 14 days from day of stroke with fulfilment of nutrition requirement by parenteral route

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. cerebrovascular stroke patients either ischemic or haemorrhagic within first 7 days 2. Age above 18 years 3. patients suffering from bulbar palsy.

Exclusion Criteria

\- Mechanically ventilated patients at first presentation. 2. Patients suffering from attacks of fits. 3. Patients suffering from signs and symptoms of pneumonia before attack of cerebrovascular stroke.

4\. Patients suffering from degenerative neurological diseases. 5. Patients with developmental delay or neurological disease. 6. Patients with hepatic or renal coma. 7. Patients with hemodynamic instability.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adel ELansary

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams university

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Abdallah Mahmoud Zaki Soudi

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Abdallah soudi

Role: CONTACT

01111228925 ext. 02

Foad Farouk

Role: CONTACT

01095022127 ext. 02

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Abdallah soudi

Role: primary

01111228925 ext. 02

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU R65/2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.