Aspiration Pneumonia in Cerebrovascular Stroke Patients Suffering from Bulbar Palsy
NCT ID: NCT06395740
Last Updated: 2025-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-05
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oral Enteral Nutrition Tube Feeding on Stroke Survivors
NCT06301646
Impact of Physical Therapy of Dysphagia on Preventing Pneumonia in Acute Stroke Patients
NCT06010940
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding on Dysphagia in Stroke Survivor
NCT06328855
The Impact of Diaphragm Training on Dysphagia in Bulbar Palsy After Ischemic Stroke
NCT06393218
Multifunctional Nutrition Tube on Social Condition and Experience in Cerebralvascular Accident
NCT06328907
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As enteral feeding via oral route is risky in patients suffering from bulbar palsy, nasogastric tube is being used as a mode of enteral feeding till recovery from bulbar palsy or doing a gastrostomy tube as an alternative mode for enteral feeding. There is no survival benefit for early enteral feeding via nasogastric tube when compared with delayed tube feeding as formulated by the Feed or Ordinary Diet (FOOD) trial and suggested delaying nasogastric feeding may decrease mortality in bulbar palsy patients (Dennis MS et al., 2005).
Although this is the common practice to get the nutritional needs, there is evidence that early enteral feeding is not nutritionally superior to early TPN administration. Moreover, there is more rapid recovery of both albumin and protein in patients started TPN rather than those of enteral feeding at least for the first 2 weeks of stroke which is the time of maximum risk of malnutrition (Yamada SM, 2015).
Bulbar palsy non ventilated cerebrovascular patients who are scheduled for nasogastric tube feeding are at a high risk of aspiration pneumonia, with incidence from 33% to 70% (Langdon PC et al., 2009). Dysfunction of Lower oesophageal sphincter is exaggerated by nasogastric tube, that means increase of incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and micro aspiration (Gomes GF., 2003). Also, nasogastric tube can be colonized by gram negative bacteria as nasogastric tube change gastric acidity and promote bacterial colonization and increasing risk of micro aspiration and sequent aspiration pneumonia (Spilker CA et al., 1996). So non ventilated cerebrovascular stroke patients suffering from bulbar palsy and scheduled for nasogastric tube enteral feeding are at risk of aspiration pneumonia (Warusevitane A et al., 2014).
Even though parenteral feeding has the advantage of protection from aspiration pneumonia, it has risk of complications like hyperglycaemia, refeeding-syndrome, bone demineralisation, catheter infections), fortunately these complications can be minimised by carefully monitoring patients and the use of teams for nutrition support especially during long-term PN.( Hartl WH et al., 2009)
Our goal in this study is to compare the incidence of aspiration pneumonia when keeping patients on total parenteral feeding regimen in comparison with early start of enteral feeding with nasogastric tube during early stage of stroke in stroke patients suffering from bulbar palsy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
First group (group A):
Group A patients will be scheduled for continuation of NPO strategy except for medications to be given via nasogastric tube till 14 days from day of stroke with fulfilment of nutrition requirement by parenteral route guided by Aspen2020 guidelines.
Second group (group B):
Group B patients will be scheduled for enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube.
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
enteral nutrition group
patients will be scheduled for enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube.The amount of nasogastric feed given each day will be calculated according to the patient's calorie requirement and administered as 100 ml nasogastric tube feeding every four hours escalating to 200 ml every four hours according to patients' toleration and caloric needs. Patients will be positioned at ≥ 45° head-end elevation during feeds. They will be observed regularly during feeds, and the position of the nasogastric tube will be confirmed before each feed by auscultation by stethoscope.
Enteral nutrtion
enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube.
total parentral nutrition group
patients will be scheduled for continuation of NPO strategy except for medications to be given via nasogastric tube till 14 days from day of stroke with fulfilment of nutrition requirement by parenteral route
TPN
of NPO strategy except for medications to be given via nasogastric tube till 14 days from day of stroke with fulfilment of nutrition requirement by parenteral route
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Enteral nutrtion
enteral nutrition via nasogastric tube.
TPN
of NPO strategy except for medications to be given via nasogastric tube till 14 days from day of stroke with fulfilment of nutrition requirement by parenteral route
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
4\. Patients suffering from degenerative neurological diseases. 5. Patients with developmental delay or neurological disease. 6. Patients with hepatic or renal coma. 7. Patients with hemodynamic instability.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adel ELansary
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Abdallah Mahmoud Zaki Soudi
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Foad Farouk
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FMASU R65/2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.