Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA) Guided Treatment in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Neoadjuvant CTX vs. Upfront Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06391892

Last Updated: 2024-04-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-11

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the clinical prognostic impact (on DFS and OS) of liquid biopsy guided treatment vs. standard of care (physicians choice) in localized pancreatic cancer (despite because of CA 19-9 levels and computed tomography, upfront surgery is recommended by tumor board). ctDNA positive patients will receive neoadjvuant chemotherapy at current gold standard physicians choice instead of upfront surgery, because of assumed high biological risk for early recurrence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) bears dramatically high relapse rates with consecutive low 5-year survival rates (4.2% over all tumor stages and 0.5% in stage IV disease) despite major improvements of interdisciplinary perioperative management and more aggressive surgical approaches to enable potentially curative pancreatic surgery. PC is estimated to represent the second most cancer associated cause of death by 2030 worldwide. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been outpointed to be a promising prognostic marker for several malignant diseases. In precursor studies, the investigators have shown (a) a definitive cut-off (42% decrease from the baseline) for the relative change of ctDNA after only 2 weeks of systemic chemotherapy to reliably (specificity 100%, sensitivity 91.7%) predict response to treatment at a median of 10 weeks earlier (80% faster) than current gold standard (computed tomography after 3 months of treatment) via simple blood collection and consecutive molecular analysis via ddPCR (Kirchweger et al., Frontiers in Oncology, 08/22), which could allow an early change of treatment regimen in the future in order to improve patients survival and decrease the amount of unevaluated cytotoxic agents. Furthermore, the investigators could show (b) that pretherapeutic detectable ctDNA in localized PC could reliably indicate early distant relapse (DFS 3.3 vs. 18.1 months) despite no radiological evidence of advanced or disseminated disease prior to surgery (Kirchweger et al., European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12/21). All patients in this study suffering from early relapse went through interdisciplinary tumor boards and did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy because of radiological resectability and CA 19-9 values within the normal range (\<500kU/l). ctDNA on the other hand bears the potential to differentiate localized from disseminated disease.

The planned project aims to prove a clinical applicable easily assessable and minimal invasive approach (mere blood collection during clinical routine) of molecular testing in the periphery to distinguish localized from disseminated disease in pancreatic cancer patients to highly individually stratify for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or upfront surgery on a (molecular)-biological base with a high sensitive method to oppose current difficulties of detection rates in PC in addition to current gold standard of radiological staging in the future.

The investigators will take approximately 30ml of blood (simple blood puncture) from patients with localized pancreatic cancer who have undergone full staging procedure and have been recommended upfront surgery by interdisciplinary tumor board. ddPCR will be performed by testing KRAS G12/13 and, if negative, KRAS Q61 preoperatively. ctDNA positive patients will be distributed to either observation group (standard of care - upfront surgery) or personalized treatment group (LB informed treatment decisions - neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy).

Treatment groups will be compared for PFS and OS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer Circulating Tumor Cell Predictive Cancer Model

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (physicians choice) vs. upfront surgery
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ctDNA guided

All patients included into the study are recommended to go for upfront surgery (localized and resectable tumor in CT and CA19-9 \<500kU/l) by tumor board.

If preoperative ctDNA in peripheral blood is positive, we assume high risk for early recurrence (because of systemic tumor burden) and apply neoadjuvant chemotherapy at physicians choice instead.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients included into the study are recommended to go for upfront surgery (CT and CA19-9) by tumor board.

If preoperative ctDNA is positive, the investigators assume high risk for early recurrence (because of systemic tumor burden) and apply neoadjuvant chemotherapy at physicians choice instead.

* Apart from blood collection (within the scope of clinical routine), there is no additional diagnostic intervention performed on the patient.
* The respective neoadjuvant chemotherapeutical drug will be selected and applied by the treating medical oncologist at physicians choice (unaffected by study participation), usually mFOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/nabPaclitaxel at standardized dosage recommended by NCCN and local guidelines.

FOLFIRONOX: Folinic acid (also known as leucovorin), F - Fluorouracil (5-FU), IRIN - Irinotecan, OX - Oxaliplatin.

Standard of care

Patient get the gold standard treatment at physicians choice, independent to study participation (here the study is just observational).

Group Type OTHER

Upfront surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard of care as recommended by tumor board (not affected by study conditions).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy instead of upfront surgery

All patients included into the study are recommended to go for upfront surgery (CT and CA19-9) by tumor board.

If preoperative ctDNA is positive, the investigators assume high risk for early recurrence (because of systemic tumor burden) and apply neoadjuvant chemotherapy at physicians choice instead.

* Apart from blood collection (within the scope of clinical routine), there is no additional diagnostic intervention performed on the patient.
* The respective neoadjuvant chemotherapeutical drug will be selected and applied by the treating medical oncologist at physicians choice (unaffected by study participation), usually mFOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/nabPaclitaxel at standardized dosage recommended by NCCN and local guidelines.

FOLFIRONOX: Folinic acid (also known as leucovorin), F - Fluorouracil (5-FU), IRIN - Irinotecan, OX - Oxaliplatin.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Upfront surgery

Standard of care as recommended by tumor board (not affected by study conditions).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Experimental Standard of care

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Informed consent
* \>18 years old
* localized pancreatic cancer to go for upfront surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* synchronous secondary malignancy
* pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University Innsbruck

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Elisabethinen Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Patrick Kirchweger

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Patrick Kirchweger, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ordensklinikum Linz, Department of Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern

Linz, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Patrick Kirchweger, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +436644159646

Email: [email protected]

Helwig Wundsam, PD, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +4373276774562

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Patrick Kirchweger, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Helwig Wundsam, PD, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1199/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id