Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer With Abraxane

NCT ID: NCT02555813

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

317 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-08

Study Completion Date

2020-09-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This observational program collects data on tolerability, safety and efficacy regarding the use of Abraxane in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients in the daily clinical routine. Additionally data on dosage that is actually used in these patients will be collected. Patients who have pancreatic cancer and additional diseases can be documented in this study, too. Collected data might generate learnings on the optimal use of Abraxane in the daily routine setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This observational program is aimed at gaining tolerability, safety and efficacy data with the routine use of Abraxane in its labeled indication in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Additionally data on real life dosing in daily clinical routine will be analyzed.

A detailed record of the medical history including co-morbidities and pre-treatment regimens will allow analysis of the impact thereof on tolerability, dosage and efficacy.

Hands-on experience with nab-paclitaxel is very limited in Austria and an non-interventional study could enhance knowledge on optimal drug handling and Adverse Event management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Abraxane + Gemcitabine

Abraxane 125mg by intravenous( IV) infusion + Gemcitabine 1000mg by intravenous on Days 1, 8, 15 of every 21 day cycle until progression

Abraxane

Intervention Type DRUG

Abraxane By IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28 until progression or toxicity

Gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine 1000mg IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28 until disease progression or toxicity

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abraxane

Abraxane By IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28 until progression or toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine

Gemcitabine 1000mg IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28 until disease progression or toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nab-paclitaxel ABI-007 Gemzar

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Metastatic pancreatic carcinoma
2. Age \> 18 years
3. Signed Informed Consent
4. Normal hepatic, renal and Bone Marrow functions

Exclusion Criteria

1\. Pregnant and lactating females 2. Previous treatment for metastatic pancreatic disease 3. Known hypersensitivity to nab-paclitaxel 4. Neutrophils \< 1,5 x 10\^9/L

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Celgene

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Guenter Voraberger, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Celgene Austria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

BHB Eisenstadt

Eisenstadt, , Austria

Site Status

LKH Feldkirch

Feldkirch, , Austria

Site Status

Medical University Graz

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Medical University Innsbruck

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

KH Elisabethinen Klagenfurt

Klagenfurt, , Austria

Site Status

LKH Klagenfurt

Klagenfurt, , Austria

Site Status

KH Krems

Krems, , Austria

Site Status

LKH Leoben

Leoben, , Austria

Site Status

KH Barmherzige Schwestern Linz

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

LKH Salzburg

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

LKH St. Pölten

Sankt Pölten, , Austria

Site Status

LKH Steyr

Steyr, , Austria

Site Status

Medical University Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

KH St. Josephs

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

KH Hanusch

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

LKH Vöcklabruck

Vöcklabruck, , Austria

Site Status

Klinikum Wels

Wels, , Austria

Site Status

LKH Wr. Neustadt

Wiener Neustadt, , Austria

Site Status

KH Zams

Zams, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McBride A, Bonafede M, Cai Q, Princic N, Tran O, Pelletier C, Parisi M, Patel M. Comparison of treatment patterns and economic outcomes among metastatic pancreatic cancer patients initiated on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;10(10):1153-1160. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1365598. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28795609 (View on PubMed)

Kim S, Signorovitch JE, Yang H, Patterson-Lomba O, Xiang CQ, Ung B, Parisi M, Marshall JL. Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States. Adv Ther. 2018 Oct;35(10):1564-1577. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30209750 (View on PubMed)

Cartwright TH, Parisi M, Espirito JL, Wilson TW, Pelletier C, Patel M, Babiker HM. Clinical Outcomes with First-Line Chemotherapy in a Large Retrospective Study of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a US Community Oncology Setting. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2018 Sep;5(3):149-159. doi: 10.1007/s40801-018-0137-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29946913 (View on PubMed)

Young R, Mainwaring P, Clingan P, Parnis FX, Asghari G, Beale P, Aly A, Botteman M, Romano A, Ferrara S, Margunato-Debay S, Harris M. nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Australian subset analyses of the phase III MPACT trial. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;14(5):e325-e331. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12999. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29932294 (View on PubMed)

Fernandez A, Salgado M, Garcia A, Buxo E, Vera R, Adeva J, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Quintero G, Llorca C, Canabate M, Lopez LJ, Munoz A, Ramirez P, Gonzalez P, Lopez C, Reboredo M, Gallardo E, Sanchez-Canovas M, Gallego J, Guillen C, Ruiz-Miravet N, Navarro-Perez V, De la Camara J, Ales-Diaz I, Pazo-Cid RA, Carmona-Bayonas A. Prognostic factors for survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer in real-life practice: the ANICE-PaC study. BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1185. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5101-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30497432 (View on PubMed)

Hegewisch-Becker S, Aldaoud A, Wolf T, Krammer-Steiner B, Linde H, Scheiner-Sparna R, Hamm D, Janicke M, Marschner N; TPK-Group (Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer). Results from the prospective German TPK clinical cohort study: Treatment algorithms and survival of 1,174 patients with locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 1;144(5):981-990. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31751. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30006989 (View on PubMed)

Barnes JA, Ellis ML, Hwang S, Emarine J, Merwin P, Salinas GD, Musher BL. Identification of Educational Gaps Among Oncologists Who Manage Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019 Mar;50(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s12029-017-0033-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29177608 (View on PubMed)

Woo W, Carey ET, Choi M. Spotlight on liposomal irinotecan for metastatic pancreatic cancer: patient selection and perspectives. Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Feb 21;12:1455-1463. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S167590. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30863113 (View on PubMed)

Sonbol MB, Ahn DH, Goldstein D, Okusaka T, Tabernero J, Macarulla T, Reni M, Li CP, O'Neil B, Van Cutsem E, Bekaii-Saab T. CanStem111P trial: a Phase III study of napabucasin plus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine. Future Oncol. 2019 Apr;15(12):1295-1302. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0903. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30768369 (View on PubMed)

Prager GW, Oehler L, Gerger A, Mlineritsch B, Andel J, Petzer A, Wilthoner K, Sliwa T, Pichler P, Winder T, Heibl S, Gruenberger B, Laengle F, Hubmann E, Korger M, Pecherstorfer M, Djanani A, Neumann HJ, Philipp-Abbrederis K, Woll E, Trondl R, Arnold-Schrauf C, Eisterer W. Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly versus younger patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Analysis of a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;143:101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33296830 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ABI-007-PANC-006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.