Optimizing Diagnosis of Splanchic Vein Thrombosis With MRDTI (Rhea)
NCT ID: NCT06390475
Last Updated: 2024-04-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
73 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-03-22
2025-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is an unquestionable need for improved diagnostic approaches for (incidental) SVT. The researchers plan to evaluate the MRDTI technique, that has been shown to be accurate in other settings of difficult-to-diagnosis venous thrombosis, for the notoriously challenging diagnosis of incidental SVT. This study targets an important unmet need and will provide the basis for precision medicine for patients with SVT in the near future, i.e. the possibility of assessment of the age of the thrombus in patients with incidental SVT, which is of utmost importance for determination of the indication for anticoagulant therapy.
If this hypothesis is proven true, i.e. sensitivity of MRDTI for SVT is indeed \>90%, the investigators will proceed with performing a randomized controlled outcome study in which patients with possible/probable chronic SVT with normal MRDTI test results and no other indications for anticoagulant therapy. These patients will be randomized between active therapeutically dosed anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation, to compare clinical outcome with regard to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism and/or Progressive symptomatic SVT as well as major bleeding.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Advanced Diagnostic Management of Suspected Recurrent Ipsilateral DVT With MRDTI
NCT02262052
The Role of Factor XIII Activation Peptide and D-dimer Values for the Diagnosis of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT)
NCT00924859
Measurement of D-Dimer Levels in Patients With Confirmed Deep Vein Thrombosis
NCT02078154
ThRombosis ExclUsion STudy
NCT03477968
Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) With Either Rivaroxaban or Current Standard of Care Therapy
NCT02210819
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is one of the manifestations of unusual site venous thromboembolism (VTE). SVT includes portal vein thrombosis (PVT), mesenteric vein hrombosis (MVT), splenic vein thrombosis (SpVT) and the Budd-Chiairi syndrome (BCS).There is no validated clinical algorithm for the diagnosis of SVT and there are no specific laboratory tests available to confirm or rule out the disease. Particularly, D-dimer tests do not have a role in the diagnosis of SVT, due to its low specificity and the high percentage of false positive results, especially in patients with cancer, liver cirrhosis or underlying inflammatory conditions, present in more than half of the total SVT population. Thus the diagnosis of SVT relies on imaging tests alone. Whereas Doppler ultrasound is the imaging test of choice for most forms of SVT, its sensitivity is only 90%, as is the sensitivity of CT angiography (CTA). MR angiography (MRA) has been reported to have 90-100% sensitivity for SVT, but this technique is limited by the need to administer a contrast agent. Furthermore, in studies evaluating the accuracy of MRA for the diagnose of SVT, gold standard for SVT (surgical validation) was lacking. Importantly, many of SVT diagnoses in clinical practice (up to 30%) are incidental findings, i.e. findings on imaging tests of the abdomen performed for another reason than suspected SVT. Whereas the diagnosis of symptomatic SVT is often challenging, the correct diagnosis of acute versus chronic SVT is even more difficult, as neither of the current available imaging tests is helpful in determination of the age and clinical relevance of the thrombus, especially in non-symptomatic patients. Due to this impossibility to determine whether the incidentally observed thrombosis is acute, chronic or even an imaging artefact, the vast majority of patients with incidental SVT are treated with often lifelong anticoagulants. It is widely acknowledged that this practice likely results in overdiagnosis and unjust exposure to anticoagulant therapy with associated risk of bleeding. An alternative imaging technique for more accurate diagnosis of SVT is MR Direct hrombus Imaging (MRDTI). This technique is in an advanced stage of development (Theia study, NCT02262052, supported by TSN grant 2013-02) and is close to implementation in clinical practice. The method is based on the formation of methemoglobin in a fresh thrombus leading to shortening of the T1 signal. It does not require contrast dye. Both the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 97-100%, specificity 100%) as well as the inter-observer agreement of MRDTI for first and recurrent DVT of the leg were reported to be excellent (kappa 0.89-0.98). Moreover, it was shown to accurately differentiate acute from chronic thrombosis. There is an unquestionable need for improved diagnostic approaches for (incidental) SVT. The researchers plan to evaluate the MRDTI technique, that has been shown to be accurate in other settings of difficult-to-diagnosis venous thrombosis, for the notoriously challenging diagnosis of incidental SVT. This study targets an important unmet need and will provide the basis for precision medicine for patients with SVT in the near future, i.e. the possibility of assessment of the age of the thrombus in patients with incidental SVT, which is of utmost importance for determination of the indication for anticoagulant therapy.
Study design:
This study is a prospective diagnostic proof of concept study to explore the diagnostic accuracy of MRDTI in the diagnostic management of acute and chronic SVT. This will be achieved by performing MRDTI scans to adjust and optimize the DTI scan sequence in 3-5 patients with confirmed, acute SVT. If a reproducible clearly positive DTI signal is achieved in all patients, the study can proceed with the inclusion of cohort 1 and 2, i.e. 35 patients with confirmed acute SVT and in 35 patients with confirmed, chronic SVT. All scans will be evaluated post-hoc by expert readers blinded for the final diagnosis. It is predetermined that at least five patients of each SVT site (PVT, SpVT and BCS and at least five patients of each SVT risk factor (oncologic, post-surgical and inflammatory/infectious) will be included. To make sure that cohort 1 is generally similar to cohort 2 frequency matching will be performed, in which all controls will be selected to get the same distribution according to SVT site and risk factor as cases.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chronic splanhnic thrombosis
Chronic Splanchnic vein thrombosis is defined by incident SVT with chronic thrombi on 2 serial imaging tests with an at least 3 months interval.
MR Direct Thrombus Imaging (MRDTI)
Both groups will get the same MRDTI, the study is a proof-of-concept study to investigate if MRDTI can reliable distinguish between acute and chronic splanchnic thrombosis.
Acute splanchnic thrombosis
Acute splanchnic vein thrombosis is defined as acute symptomatic or acute incidental asymptomatic thrombosis in the mesenteric, splenic, portal or hepatic veins. Acute symptomatic thrombosis refers to acute onset (\< 2 week existent) of symptoms characteristic for SVT thrombosis (including but not limited to abdominal pain) with SVT confirmed with DUS, CTA or MRA, dependent on the anatomical location. Acute incidental asymptomatic thrombosis refers to an incidentally detected SVT with DUS, CTA or MRA, absent on previous diagnostic tests performed in the last 2 weeks before the new incidental finding, in patients without symptoms characteristic of SVT.
MR Direct Thrombus Imaging (MRDTI)
Both groups will get the same MRDTI, the study is a proof-of-concept study to investigate if MRDTI can reliable distinguish between acute and chronic splanchnic thrombosis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MR Direct Thrombus Imaging (MRDTI)
Both groups will get the same MRDTI, the study is a proof-of-concept study to investigate if MRDTI can reliable distinguish between acute and chronic splanchnic thrombosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with confirmed non-symptomatic chronic SVT defined by incident SVT with chronic thrombi on 2 serial imaging tests with at least 3 months interval (controls, group 2)
3. Aged 18 years and older
4. Willing and able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. A medical condition, associated illness or co-morbid circumstances that precludes completion of the study procedures (MRI and 90-day follow-up assessment), including but not limited to lifeexpectancy less than 3 months, inability to lie flat, morbid obesity preventing use of MR and claustrophobia.
3. Patients with decompensated liver disease with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis (since MRDTI evaluation will be inadequate in these patients)
4. Patients with suspected tumour thrombus
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ISTH
UNKNOWN
Trombosestichting Nederland
UNKNOWN
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erik Klok
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
F.A. Klok, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Study Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gemelli Hospital
Rome, , Italy
Varese hospital
Varese, , Italy
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Roberto Pola, Prof.
Role: primary
Giovanna Colombo
Role: primary
M.N. Lauw, MD PhD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Riva N, Ageno W. Approach to thrombosis at unusual sites: Splanchnic and cerebral vein thrombosis. Vasc Med. 2017 Dec;22(6):529-540. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17734057.
Dai J, Qi X, Peng Y, Hou Y, Chen J, Li H, Guo X. Association between D-dimer level and portal venous system thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: a retrospective observational study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):15296-301. eCollection 2015.
Riva N, Ageno W. Clinical manifestations and imaging tools in the diagnosis of splanchnic and cerebral vein thromboses. Thromb Res. 2018 Mar;163:252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.06.030. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Cakmak O, Elmas N, Tamsel S, Demirpolat G, Sever A, Altunel E, Killi R. Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9229-x.
Kreft B, Strunk H, Flacke S, Wolff M, Conrad R, Gieseke J, Pauleit D, Bachmann R, Hirner A, Schild HH. Detection of thrombosis in the portal venous system: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2000 Jul;216(1):86-92. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl2386.
Riva N, Ageno W, Schulman S, Beyer-Westendorf J, Duce R, Malato A, Santoro R, Poli D, Verhamme P, Martinelli I, Kamphuisen P, Dentali F; International Registry on Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis (IRSVT) study group. Clinical history and antithrombotic treatment of incidentally detected splanchnic vein thrombosis: a multicentre, international prospective registry. Lancet Haematol. 2016 Jun;3(6):e267-75. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30020-5. Epub 2016 May 11.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P18.089
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.