CLAD Deconvolved PERG Responses in Glaucoma Patients

NCT ID: NCT06388096

Last Updated: 2024-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-01

Study Completion Date

2025-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Glaucoma is a progressive disease resulting in blindness. Determining the onset of the disease is critical so patients may obtain treatment to preserve useful vision. This study will collect data from a population of glaucoma suspects (with positive factors for the disease but with normal vision) along with a population of age matched controls using the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and other standard eye tests for glaucoma. The PERG measures the function of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) which come together to form the optic nerve. RGCs may become dysfunctional before dying. The Continuous loop deconvolution technique (CLAD) will be used to extract transient PERG responses in both glaucoma suspects and age matched controls. All patients will be monitored with PERG, Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT) and other ancillary tests over 2 years. CLAD will be compared with conventional techniques of monitoring glaucoma (standard PERG, OCT, visual field etc) to see if the CLAD is better at distinguishing between glaucoma suspects and controls.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The PERG is recorded from small metallic cups taped on the skin or contact electrodes on the face similarly to an electrocardiogram except that the location is the skin around the eyes.

The only physical contact the subject will experience is a gentle cleaning of the skin with an alcohol prep pad. During the test the subject will be asked to look at a visual stimulus display for about 3 minutes. Depending on the experimental protocol, the subject may be asked to either sit during the test or to lie down in a bed. Lying down will cause a momentary increase of your eye pressure similar to the one that occurs during your normal sleep. This may help to understand whether or not your optic nerve functions normally when the pressure in your eye increases.

For OCT evaluation, the pupil will be dilated with drops similar to those used in a standard eye exam. The subject will have to briefly look at a mark inside the instrument one eye at a time.

For Visual field (VF) evaluation, the subject will be asked to look at a fixation mark inside the Visual Field testing equipment and asked to signal when they see small lights in their periphery.

PERG, OCT and VF will be performed during the same day of the visit. If the participant has already done these tests in the past, as part of another study or as part of standard treatment, the results of these tests will be obtained from shier record, and be included in this study.

RISKS:

For the PERG, the only significant risk to you is a small chance of skin discomfort from the cleansing agent for skin electrodes, which should go away without treatment. For OCT, there is a rare risk to you of an allergic reaction to the drops used to dilate your pupils. The risk is even lower if you did not have any reaction during your previous eye exams. In case of an allergic reaction, your eye doctor will immediately treat it. If you had previous problems with pupil dilation, you may wish to speak to your eye doctor about the option of doing this additional test. There are no significant risks associated with VF testing

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma, Suspect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Glaucoma Suspects

Patients with suspicion of glaucoma based on positive factors of disease.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pattern Electroretinogram

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Non-invasive recording of retinal potentials from a modulating pattern stimulus viewed on a visual display and recorded from surface electrodes around the eye.

Controls

Age matched controls to the glaucoma suspect group with no indications of glaucoma.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pattern Electroretinogram

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Non-invasive recording of retinal potentials from a modulating pattern stimulus viewed on a visual display and recorded from surface electrodes around the eye.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pattern Electroretinogram

Non-invasive recording of retinal potentials from a modulating pattern stimulus viewed on a visual display and recorded from surface electrodes around the eye.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 to 85 years, inclusive
2. Refractive errors within -5 to +3 diopters
3. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than or equal to 20/30 (Snellen)
4. Normal standard automated perimetry (SAP) according to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) criteria15 (reliability \< 15% on all indices, normality \> 5% on all global indices in two consecutive sessions 6 months apart)
5. Minimum untreated Intraocular pressure IOP of 15 mm Hg
6. Glaucoma Suspect Status defined as one or more of the following:

* Glaucomatous optic disc appearance (vertical cup-to-disc ratio \[C/D\] ≥0.5
* Cup disc ratio asymmetry ≥0.2
* Localized thinning of the disc
* Presence or history of splinter disc hemorrhage
* Moderately increased IOP (\>21 to \<28 mm Hg).
* Family history of vision loss for glaucoma

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age-related macular degeneration
2. Diabetes
3. Parkinson's disease
4. Multiple sclerosis
5. Unwilling or unable to give consent, unwilling to accept randomization, or unable to return for scheduled protocol visits.
6. Pregnant or nursing women.
7. Currently using prescribed pressure lowering medicines and unwilling to be withdrawn from them.
8. An OHTS risk score high enough in the judgment of the ophthalmologist or optometrist managing the patient to recommend pressure lowering medicine to the patient and not randomization.
9. An OCT abnormal enough in a pattern consistent with glaucoma.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Miami

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jorvec Corp.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Miami, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute 900 NW 17th Street

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jonathon A Toft-Nielsen, PhD

Role: CONTACT

305-668-6102 ext. 35

Edward Miskiel, PhD

Role: CONTACT

305-688-6102

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Vittorio Porciatti, MD/PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Porciatti V, Feuer WJ, Monsalve P, Triolo G, Vazquez L, McSoley J, Ventura LM. Head-down Posture in Glaucoma Suspects Induces Changes in IOP, Systemic Pressure, and PERG That Predict Future Loss of Optic Nerve Tissue. J Glaucoma. 2017 May;26(5):459-465. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000648.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28263259 (View on PubMed)

Porciatti V, Chou TH. Modeling Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction in Optic Neuropathies. Cells. 2021 Jun 5;10(6):1398. doi: 10.3390/cells10061398.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34198840 (View on PubMed)

Monsalve P, Ren S, Triolo G, Vazquez L, Henderson AD, Kostic M, Gordon P, Feuer WJ, Porciatti V. Steady-state PERG adaptation: a conspicuous component of response variability with clinical significance. Doc Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;136(3):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s10633-018-9633-2. Epub 2018 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29779071 (View on PubMed)

Monsalve P, Triolo G, Toft-Nielsen J, Bohorquez J, Henderson AD, Delgado R, Miskiel E, Ozdamar O, Feuer WJ, Porciatti V. Next Generation PERG Method: Expanding the Response Dynamic Range and Capturing Response Adaptation. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017 May 22;6(3):5. doi: 10.1167/tvst.6.3.5. eCollection 2017 May.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28553559 (View on PubMed)

Toft-Nielsen J, Bohorquez J, Ozdamar O. Unwrapping of transient responses from high rate overlapping pattern electroretinograms by deconvolution. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Oct;125(10):2079-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24618216 (View on PubMed)

Ozdamar O, Toft-Nielsen J, Bohorquez J, Porciatti V. Relationship between transient and steady-state pattern electroretinograms: theoretical and experimental assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Dec 4;55(12):8560-70. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15685.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25477321 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PERGCLAD001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Canadian Glaucoma Study
NCT00262626 TERMINATED NA
Advanced Glaucoma Progression Study
NCT01742819 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING