SPAGO: Sirolimus Paclitaxel Angiographic Gain Objective
NCT ID: NCT06373601
Last Updated: 2025-12-03
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
RECRUITING
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
140 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2024-09-05
Study Completion Date
2027-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of the study is to compare angiographic outcomes of Selution sirolimus coated balloon (MedAlliance) versus SeQuent Please Neo paclitaxel coated balloon (Bbraun) for the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions in medium size vessels (\>2.00 mm and ≤3.00 mm) with respect to Net Gain (mm) and Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) at 12 months follow-up.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TReAtmeNt of Small Coronary Vessels: MagicTouch Sirolimus Coated Balloon
NCT03913832
Coronary Artery Disease
DCB
UNKNOWN
NA
Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis by a Sirolimus (Rapamycin) Coated Balloon or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
NCT02996318
DES In-stent Stenosis
COMPLETED
NA
Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs. Intravascular Brachytherapy in In-Stent Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions(SISR)
NCT00231257
In-Stent Restenosis
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis
NCT04240444
Coronary Artery Disease
In Stent Restenosis
COMPLETED
NA
Treatment of Coronary In-stent Restenosis (ISR) by a Sirolimus Coated or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
NCT03242096
Coronary Restenosis
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, no-profit and post-market study in subjects with small vessels, i.e. at least one de novo lesion in a small vessel (\>2.00 mm and ≤3.00). Vessel size is evaluated by visual estimation. It is possible to include only one study lesion per patient. For the purposes of this study, in cases of diffuse coronary artery disease where overlapped DCB are utilized for the treatment of the lesion, this will be considered as a single lesion. In case of a successful predilatation (i.e. no major (type D, E, F) angiographic dissections, residual stenosis ≤ 30% and TIMI flow = 3), the subject will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to SelutionTM or SeQuent Please NeoTM. Randomization will be stratified according to DCB length (\< 30 mm or ≥ 30 mm) in order to include at least 100 patients treated with DCB of 30 mm or longer. Measurements of intramyocardial resistances, after lesion preparation prior to DCB treatment and after DCB treatment (2 measurements), will be limited to a maximum of 100 lesions treated with DCB ≥ 30 mm. Given the lack of literature data on intramyocardial resistance measurements, a minimum of 100 subjects is considered necessary to provide an initial evaluation of these parameters. With a total sample size of 140 patients for the study, it will be allowed to enroll up to 40 patients treated with DCB \< 30 mm. Once this limit is reached, only patients treated with DCB ≥ 30 mm will be enrolled while maintaining a 1:1 randomization ratio. During the index procedure, it is possible to treat other not study lesions (if applicable) with any other commercial device (e.g. drug-eluting stent) if they are located in a different epicardial territory than the study target lesion. All not studylesions should be treated prior to study target lesion procedure, and should be successful and uncomplicated.
Follow-up by phone call will occur at 1 and 6 months post-PCI. At 12 months all subjects will perform an angiographic follow up at the same site where the index procedure was performed. Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) assessment will be performed at baseline (pre- and post-procedure) and on follow up angiography by the imaging core lab. FFR assessment will be performed at the time of follow-up angiography.
All subjects must receive dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT), being aspirin (ASA) and P2Y12 inhibition therapy for at least 1 month after drug coated balloon PCI or according to standard local practice (with the choice of agent left to the discretion of the investigator), followed by ASA monotherapy indefinitely. However, in case the subject had recent ACS or is receiving additional drug-eluting stents, DAPT must be given according to local standard of care.
Follow-up by phone call will occur at 1 and 6 months post-PCI. At 12 months all subjects will perform an angiographic follow up at the same site where the index procedure was performed. Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) assessment will be performed at baseline (pre- and post-procedure) and on follow up angiography by the imaging core lab. FFR assessment will be performed at the time of follow-up angiography.
All subjects must receive dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT), being aspirin (ASA) and P2Y12 inhibition therapy for at least 1 month after drug coated balloon PCI or according to standard local practice (with the choice of agent left to the discretion of the investigator), followed by ASA monotherapy indefinitely. However, in case the subject had recent ACS or is receiving additional drug-eluting stents, DAPT must be given according to local standard of care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Coronary Artery Disease
Stenosis Coronary
Coronary Artery Lesion
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
140 subjects will be enrolled in a competitive way and 1:1 randomized to receive treatment with either the study device (SelutionTM) or the control device (SeQuent Please NeoTM). Randomization will be stratified according to DCB length: at least 100 patients treated with DCB ≥ 30 mm will be assigned to either SelutionTM or SeQuent Please NeoTM, while a maximum of 40 patients treated with DCB \< 30 mm will be assigned to either SelutionTM or SeQuent Please NeoTM. A minimum of 100 subjects treated with DCB ≥ 30 mm is considered necessary to provide an initial evaluation of intramyocardial resistance measurements, due to the lack of literature data on these parameters.
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
sirolimus-eluting balloon (Selution)
DCB angioplasty with a sirolimus-eluting balloon
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
sirolimus-eluting balloon (Selution)
Intervention Type
DEVICE
PCI treatment with DCB, in particular sirolimus coated balloon
paclitaxel-eluting balloon (SeQuent Please Neo)
DCB angioplasty with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
paclitaxel-eluting balloon (SeQuent Please Neo)
Intervention Type
DEVICE
PCI treatment with DCB, in particular paclitaxel coated balloon
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sirolimus-eluting balloon (Selution)
PCI treatment with DCB, in particular sirolimus coated balloon
Intervention Type
DEVICE
paclitaxel-eluting balloon (SeQuent Please Neo)
PCI treatment with DCB, in particular paclitaxel coated balloon
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Male or female subjects ≥18 years
2. Subject with chronic stable angina or stabilized acute coronary syndromes with normal cardiac biomarker values.
3. The subject has at least one de-novo lesion in a small vessel (\>2.00 mm and ≤3.00 mm prior to pre-dilatation) with a diameter stenosis between 50% and 99% (prior to pre-dilatation). It is possible to enroll subjects that have a stent previously implanted in the same epicardial territory (main vessel and ramifications) of the target lesion
4. Patients with target lesion to be treated with DCB \< 30 mm in length (up to 40 patients) or with DCB ≥ 30 mm in length (at least 100 patients)
5. Able to understand and provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures including 12 months angiographic follow-up
6. Subject must have completed the follow-up phase of any previous study
2. Subject with chronic stable angina or stabilized acute coronary syndromes with normal cardiac biomarker values.
3. The subject has at least one de-novo lesion in a small vessel (\>2.00 mm and ≤3.00 mm prior to pre-dilatation) with a diameter stenosis between 50% and 99% (prior to pre-dilatation). It is possible to enroll subjects that have a stent previously implanted in the same epicardial territory (main vessel and ramifications) of the target lesion
4. Patients with target lesion to be treated with DCB \< 30 mm in length (up to 40 patients) or with DCB ≥ 30 mm in length (at least 100 patients)
5. Able to understand and provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures including 12 months angiographic follow-up
6. Subject must have completed the follow-up phase of any previous study
Exclusion Criteria
1. Subject is a woman who is pregnant or nursing (a pregnancy test must be performed within 7 days prior to the index procedure in women of child-bearing potential)
2. Evidence of ongoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ECG and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (according to local standard hospital practice) have not returned within normal limits at the time of procedure
3. Known contraindication or hypersensitivity to sirolimus, paclitaxel, or to medications such as aspirin, heparin, and all of the following four medications: clopidogrel bisulfate, ticlopidine, prasugrel, ticagrelor
4. Subjects who experienced a previous PCI with DCB in the epicardial territory (main vessel and ramifications) where the target lesion is located, during the last 12 months
5. Subject suffered from stroke/TIA during the last 6 months
6. LVEF \<30%
7. Platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or \>400,000 cells/mm3, a WBC of \<3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis)
8. Known renal insufficiency (e.g. serum creatinine \>2,5 mg/dL, creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min or eGFR ≤30 mL/min/m2), or subject on dialysis, or acute kidney failure (as per physician judgment)
9. Subject undergoing planned surgery within 1 month with the necessity to stop DAPT
10. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
11. The subject is a recipient of a heart transplant
12. Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 12 months
13. The subject is unwilling/not able to return for angiographic re-catheterisation at 12 months follow-up
14. Currently participating in another trial
15. Target vessel size \>3.00 mm
16. Target vessel size ≤2.00 mm
17. Target lesion has a diameter stenosis \< 50% prior to pre-dilatation
18. Target lesion has a total occlusion or TIMI flow \< 2 prior to pre-dilatation
19. Pre-dilatation of the target lesion not performed or not successful (residual stenosis \> 30%, TIMI flow \< 3 and presence of major angiographic dissections)
20. Target lesion in left main stem
21. The target vessel contains visible thrombus
22. Aorto-ostial target lesion (within 3 mm of the aorta junction)
23. Lesion is located within an arterial or saphenous vein graft or distal to a diseased arterial or saphenous vein graft
2. Evidence of ongoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ECG and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (according to local standard hospital practice) have not returned within normal limits at the time of procedure
3. Known contraindication or hypersensitivity to sirolimus, paclitaxel, or to medications such as aspirin, heparin, and all of the following four medications: clopidogrel bisulfate, ticlopidine, prasugrel, ticagrelor
4. Subjects who experienced a previous PCI with DCB in the epicardial territory (main vessel and ramifications) where the target lesion is located, during the last 12 months
5. Subject suffered from stroke/TIA during the last 6 months
6. LVEF \<30%
7. Platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or \>400,000 cells/mm3, a WBC of \<3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis)
8. Known renal insufficiency (e.g. serum creatinine \>2,5 mg/dL, creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min or eGFR ≤30 mL/min/m2), or subject on dialysis, or acute kidney failure (as per physician judgment)
9. Subject undergoing planned surgery within 1 month with the necessity to stop DAPT
10. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
11. The subject is a recipient of a heart transplant
12. Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 12 months
13. The subject is unwilling/not able to return for angiographic re-catheterisation at 12 months follow-up
14. Currently participating in another trial
15. Target vessel size \>3.00 mm
16. Target vessel size ≤2.00 mm
17. Target lesion has a diameter stenosis \< 50% prior to pre-dilatation
18. Target lesion has a total occlusion or TIMI flow \< 2 prior to pre-dilatation
19. Pre-dilatation of the target lesion not performed or not successful (residual stenosis \> 30%, TIMI flow \< 3 and presence of major angiographic dissections)
20. Target lesion in left main stem
21. The target vessel contains visible thrombus
22. Aorto-ostial target lesion (within 3 mm of the aorta junction)
23. Lesion is located within an arterial or saphenous vein graft or distal to a diseased arterial or saphenous vein graft
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Evidence per Attività e Ricerche Cardiovascolari ONLUS
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio AC Colombo, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Fondazione Evidence ONLUS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo, Italy/Bergamo, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Fondazione Poliambulanza
Brescia, Italy/Brescia, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Clinica Montevergine
Mercogliano, Italy/Avellino, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara
Ferrara, Italy/Ferrara, Italy
Site Status
WITHDRAWN
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Milan, Italy/Milano, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Italy/Milano, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Clinica Mediterranea
Napoli, Italy/Napoli, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga
Orbassano, Italy/Torino, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Ospedale di Rivoli
Rivoli, Italy/Torino, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Ospedale Sant'Andrea
Vercelli, Italy/Vercelli, Italy
Site Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Italy
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Duan Y, Wang Y, Zhang M, Li Z, Chen L, Miao H, Pei S, Lu Y, Wang Z. Computational Pressure-Fluid Dynamics Applied to Index of Microcirculatory Resistance, Predicting the Prognosis of Drug-Coated Balloons Compared With Drug-Eluting Stents in STEMI Patients. Front Physiol. 2022 May 24;13:898659. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.898659. eCollection 2022.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nishi T, Murai T, Ciccarelli G, Shah SV, Kobayashi Y, Derimay F, Waseda K, Moonen A, Hoshino M, Hirohata A, Yong ASC, Ng MKC, Amano T, Barbato E, Kakuta T, Fearon WF. Prognostic Value of Coronary Microvascular Function Measured Immediately After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: An International Multicenter Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e007889. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007889. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, Caffarelli AD, Robbins RC, Fitzgerald PJ, Yock PG, Yeung AC. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 2003 Jul 1;107(25):3129-32. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080700.98607.D1. Epub 2003 Jun 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Del Buono MG, Montone RA, Camilli M, Carbone S, Narula J, Lavie CJ, Niccoli G, Crea F. Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Diseases: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep 28;78(13):1352-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.042.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Colleran R, Harada Y, Kufner S, Giacoppo D, Joner M, Cassese S, Ibrahim T, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Changes in high-sensitivity troponin after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for drug-eluting stent restenosis. EuroIntervention. 2017 Oct 20;13(8):962-969. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00939.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ikenaga H, Kurisu S, Ishibashi K, Dohi Y, Fukuda Y, Kihara Y. Slow-flow phenomenon after Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty: findings from optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):e59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.11.016. Epub 2015 Mar 26. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Young M, Cuculi F, Erne P. PTCA with drug-coated balloons is associated with immediate decrease of coronary flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;81(4):682-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23502. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Aihara K, Torii S, Ito M, Koseki K, Shiozaki M, Sato Y, Nakamura N, Yoshikawa A, Ikari Y, Nakazawa G. Biological differences of three paclitaxel- and sirolimus-coated balloons on coronary lesions in a rabbit model. EuroIntervention. 2024 Mar 18;20(6):e389-e398. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00425.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kawai K, Rahman MT, Nowicki R, Kolodgie FD, Sakamoto A, Kawakami R, Konishi T, Virmani R, Labhasetwar V, Finn AV. Efficacy and Safety of Dual Paclitaxel and Sirolimus Nanoparticle-Coated Balloon. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2024 May 1;9(6):774-789. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2024.02.002. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Boitet A, Grassin-Delyle S, Louedec L, Dupont S, Lamy E, Coggia M, Michel JB, Coscas R. An Experimental Study of Paclitaxel Embolisation During Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;57(4):578-586. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.11.019. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nakamura R, Torii S, Kato T, Kawasaki D. A Case of Vasculitis Due to Distal Particulate Embolization After Use of Drug-Coated Balloon. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul 25;15(14):1486-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.05.030. Epub 2022 Jun 29. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Torii S, Yahagi K, Mori H, Harari E, Romero ME, Kolodgie FD, Young B, Ragheb A, Virmani R, Finn AV. Biologic Drug Effect and Particulate Embolization of Drug-Eluting Stents versus Drug-Coated Balloons in Healthy Swine Femoropopliteal Arteries. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jul;29(7):1041-1049.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 May 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Torii S, Jinnouchi H, Sakamoto A, Romero ME, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Finn AV. Comparison of Biologic Effect and Particulate Embolization after Femoral Artery Treatment with Three Drug-Coated Balloons in Healthy Swine Model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Jan;30(1):103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Milewski K, Afari ME, Tellez A, Aboodi MS, Kim JS, Cheng Y, Conditt GB, McGregor JC, Yi GH, Stenoien M, Langanki D, Krueger CG, Kaluza GL, Granada JF. Evaluation of efficacy and dose response of different paclitaxel-coated balloon formulations in a novel swine model of iliofemoral in-stent restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(10):1081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.012.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vos NS, Fagel ND, Amoroso G, Herrman JR, Patterson MS, Piers LH, van der Schaaf RJ, Slagboom T, Vink MA. Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The REVELATION Randomized Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1691-1699. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chen D, Yidilisi A, Zhang Y, Fang J, Zheng Y, Gao F, Li W, Zhou H, Chen Y, Lu D, Wang J, Jiang J. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent for de Novo Non-Small Coronary Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May 13;17(9):1182-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.276. Epub 2024 Feb 21. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shin ES, Ann SH, Balbir Singh G, Lim KH, Kleber FX, Koo BK. Fractional flow reserve-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug;88(2):193-200. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26257. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chung JH, Lee KE, Her AY, Lee JM, Doh JH, Nam CW, Koo BK, Shin ES. Comparison of fractional flow reserve and angiographic characteristics after balloon angioplasty in de novo coronary lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;35(11):1945-1954. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01649-y. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, Banning AP, Budaj A, Buechel RR, Chiariello GA, Chieffo A, Christodorescu RM, Deaton C, Doenst T, Jones HW, Kunadian V, Mehilli J, Milojevic M, Piek JJ, Pugliese F, Rubboli A, Semb AG, Senior R, Ten Berg JM, Van Belle E, Van Craenenbroeck EM, Vidal-Perez R, Winther S; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3415-3537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J Koolen JJ, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 27;334(26):1703-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606273342604.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ann SH, Balbir Singh G, Lim KH, Koo BK, Shin ES. Anatomical and Physiological Changes after Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Atherosclerotic De Novo Coronary Lesions: Serial IVUS-VH and FFR Study. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0147057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147057. eCollection 2016.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mehilli J, Dibra A, Kastrati A, Pache J, Dirschinger J, Schomig A; Intracoronary Drug-Eluting Stenting to Abrogate Restenosis in Small Arteries (ISAR-SMART 3) Study Investigators. Randomized trial of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in small coronary vessels. Eur Heart J. 2006 Feb;27(3):260-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi721. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Guo S, Bi C, Wang X, Lv T, Zhang Z, Chen X, Yan J, Mao D, Huang W, Ye M, Liu Z, Xie X. Comparative efficacy of interventional therapies and devices for coronary in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon. 2024 Mar 8;10(6):e27521. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27521. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ahmad WAW, Nuruddin AA, Abdul Kader MASK, Ong TK, Liew HB, Ali RM, Mahmood Zuhdi AS, Ismail MD, Yusof AKM, Schwenke C, Kutschera M, Scheller B. Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions by a Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr 11;15(7):770-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ninomiya K, Serruys PW, Colombo A, Reimers B, Basavarajaiah S, Sharif F, Testa L, Di Mario C, Nerla R, Ding D, Huang J, Kotoku N, Kageyama S, Kageyama M, Sevestre E, Fezzi S, Dijkstra J, O'Leary N, Morel MA, Garg S, Cortese B, Onuma Y. A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Sirolimus-Coated Balloon With Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in De Novo Small Vessels. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Dec 11;16(23):2884-2896. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.09.026. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gitto M, Sticchi A, Chiarito M, Novelli L, Leone PP, Mincione G, Oliva A, Condello F, Rossi ML, Regazzoli D, Gasparini G, Cozzi O, Stefanini GG, Condorelli G, Reimers B, Mangieri A, Colombo A. Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for De Novo Lesions on the Left Anterior Descending Artery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Dec;16(12):e013232. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013232. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, Ge J, Poerner TC, Shin ES, Alfonso F, Latib A, Ong PJ, Rissanen TT, Saucedo J, Scheller B, Kleber FX; International DCB Consensus Group. Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1391-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.043. Epub 2020 May 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Unverdorben M, Kleber FX, Heuer H, Figulla HR, Vallbracht C, Leschke M, Cremers B, Hardt S, Buerke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in the PEPCAD I study: are lesions clinically stable from 12 to 36 months? EuroIntervention. 2013 Sep;9(5):620-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I5A99.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Madhavan MV, Kirtane AJ, Redfors B, Genereux P, Ben-Yehuda O, Palmerini T, Benedetto U, Biondi-Zoccai G, Smits PC, von Birgelen C, Mehran R, McAndrew T, Serruys PW, Leon MB, Pocock SJ, Stone GW. Stent-Related Adverse Events >1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 18;75(6):590-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.058.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kufner S, Ernst M, Cassese S, Joner M, Mayer K, Colleran R, Koppara T, Xhepa E, Koch T, Wiebe J, Ibrahim T, Fusaro M, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Byrne RA; ISAR-TEST-5 Investigators. 10-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Versus Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 14;76(2):146-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.026.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Capodanno D, Angiolillo DJ. Timing, Selection, Modulation, and Duration of P2Y12 Inhibitors for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan 9;16(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.023.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cortese B, Micheli A, Picchi A, Coppolaro A, Bandinelli L, Severi S, Limbruno U. Paclitaxel-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent during PCI of small coronary vessels, a prospective randomised clinical trial. The PICCOLETO study. Heart. 2010 Aug;96(16):1291-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.195057.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Latib A, Colombo A, Castriota F, Micari A, Cremonesi A, De Felice F, Marchese A, Tespili M, Presbitero P, Sgueglia GA, Buffoli F, Tamburino C, Varbella F, Menozzi A. A randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels: the BELLO (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.020. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jeger RV, Farah A, Ohlow MA, Mangner N, Mobius-Winkler S, Leibundgut G, Weilenmann D, Wohrle J, Richter S, Schreiber M, Mahfoud F, Linke A, Stephan FP, Mueller C, Rickenbacher P, Coslovsky M, Gilgen N, Osswald S, Kaiser C, Scheller B; BASKET-SMALL 2 Investigators. Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): an open-label randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):849-856. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31719-7. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tang Y, Qiao S, Su X, Chen Y, Jin Z, Chen H, Xu B, Kong X, Pang W, Liu Y, Yu Z, Li X, Li H, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Li W, Tian J, Guan C, Xu B, Gao R; RESTORE SVD China Investigators. Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Small-Vessel Disease: The RESTORE SVD China Randomized Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 10;11(23):2381-2392. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.009.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lassen JF, Burzotta F, Banning AP, Lefevre T, Darremont O, Hildick-Smith D, Chieffo A, Pan M, Holm NR, Louvard Y, Stankovic G. Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1540-1553. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00622.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Latib A, Ruparelia N, Menozzi A, Castriota F, Micari A, Cremonesi A, De Felice F, Marchese A, Tespili M, Presbitero P, Sgueglia GA, Buffoli F, Tamburino C, Varbella F, Colombo A. 3-Year Follow-Up of the Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization Study (BELLO). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1132-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.008. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cortese B, Bertoletti A. Paclitaxel coated balloons for coronary artery interventions: a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical data. Int J Cardiol. 2012 Nov 1;161(1):4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.855. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wohrle J. Drug-coated balloons for coronary and peripheral interventional procedures. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012 Oct;14(5):635-41. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0290-x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):810-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Togni M, Eber S, Widmer J, Billinger M, Wenaweser P, Cook S, Vogel R, Seiler C, Eberli FR, Maier W, Corti R, Roffi M, Luscher TF, Garachemani A, Hess OM, Wandel S, Meier B, Juni P, Windecker S. Impact of vessel size on outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of the SIRTAX trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 18;50(12):1123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.015. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Park KH, Park SW, Hong MK, Kim YH, Lee BK, Park DW, Choi BR, Kim MJ, Park KM, Lee CW, Cheong SS, Kim JJ, Park SJ. Comparison of the effectiveness of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for small coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):589-94. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20700.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tanimoto S, Daemen J, Tsuchida K, Garcia-Garcia HM, de Jaegere P, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Two-year clinical outcome after coronary stenting of small vessels using 2.25-mm sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: insight into the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jan;69(1):94-103. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20907.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zhang X, Wang Q, Wang X, Xu X, Zhu J. [Comparison of limus-eluting stent with paclitaxel-eluting stent for patients with coronary small vessel disease:a systematic review and meta-analysis]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 May 25;46(3):305-314. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2017.06.14. Chinese.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Katsanos K, Spiliopoulos S, Kitrou P, Krokidis M, Karnabatidis D. Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bohme T, Noory E, Beschorner U, Macharzina R, Zeller T. The SELUTION SLR drug-eluting balloon system for the treatment of symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions. Future Cardiol. 2021 Mar;17(2):257-267. doi: 10.2217/fca-2020-0085. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Costa RA, Mandal SC, Hazra PK, Chopda M, Chandra P, Damiani LP, Abizaid A, Hiremath S. Sirolimus-Coated Balloon With a Microsphere-Based Technology for the Treatment of De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Lesions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Dec;45:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.08.037. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Madanchi M, Cioffi GM, Attinger-Toller A, Seiler T, Somm S, Koch T, Tersalvi G, Wolfrum M, Moccetti F, Toggweiler S, Kobza R, Levine MB, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bossard M, Cuculi F. Metal free percutaneous coronary interventions in all-comers: First experience with a novel sirolimus-coated balloon. Cardiol J. 2022;29(6):906-916. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0106. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Spaulding C, Krackhardt F, Bogaerts K, Urban P, Meis S, Morice MC, Eccleshall S. Comparing a strategy of sirolimus-eluting balloon treatment to drug-eluting stent implantation in de novo coronary lesions in all-comers: Design and rationale of the SELUTION DeNovo Trial. Am Heart J. 2023 Apr;258:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rezkalla SH, Stankowski RV, Hanna J, Kloner RA. Management of No-Reflow Phenomenon in the Catheterization Laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 13;10(3):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.059.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kloner RA, Dai W. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and no-reflow. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jan 21;43(2):284-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.005. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Com-Nougue C, Rodary C, Patte C. How to establish equivalence when data are censored: a randomized trial of treatments for B non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Stat Med. 1993 Jul 30;12(14):1353-64. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121407.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hicks KA, Stockbridge NL, Targum SL, Temple RJ. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium consensus report: the Food and Drug Administration perspective. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2664-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032433. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thygesen K. 'Ten Commandments' for the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction 2018. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):226. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy856. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, Mehran R, Mack MJ, Brilakis ES, Reilly JP, Zoghbi G, Holper E, Stone GW. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 22;62(17):1563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.720.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone GW, Spertus J, Onuma Y, Morel MA, van Es GA, Zuckerman B, Fearon WF, Taggart D, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Vranckx P, Windecker S, Cutlip D, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2635-2650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04280029
SELUTION SLR™ 014 In-stent Restenosis
http://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/non-inferiority-clinical-trials
Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SPAGO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Study of the 2.25mm Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT00232739
COMPLETED
PHASE3
The Initial Double-Blind Drug-Eluting Stent vs Bare-Metal Stent Study.
NCT00233805
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization (BELLO) Study
NCT01086579
UNKNOWN
NA
Treatment of Coronary De-novo Stenosis by a Sirolimus Coated Balloon or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter
NCT03908450
COMPLETED
NA
MagicTouch Sirolimus Drug Coated Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Coronary Lesions
NCT02400632
COMPLETED
PHASE3
FIM-BR - First-in-Man Study (Brazil Part) With Sirolimus-Coated BX VELOCITY Stent
NCT00233792
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
Evaluation of Sirolimus-Eluting, Heparin-Coated CoCr Stent in the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions in Small Vessels(EVOLUTION)
NCT00233779
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Evaluation of Two Reduced Sirolimus Doses in Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions (REDOX)
NCT00233766
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
SELUTION 4 De Novo Small Vessel IDE Trial
NCT05946629
RECRUITING
NA
Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization
NCT00297661
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Per-cutaneous Intervention Based Paclitaxel and Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions (PAINT)
NCT00752362
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Paclitaxel-coated Balloon for Treatment of De-novo Non-complex Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT04561739
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
MagicTouch™Sirolimus-Coated Balloon for Treatment of Coronary Artery Lesions in Small Vessels
NCT06271590
RECRUITING
NA
Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis 2 Study
NCT03667313
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Double or Single Dose Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT00233714
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
SeQuent® SCB "All Comers" Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF)
NCT04470934
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
AnGiographic Performance With A Sirolimus-elutiNG Balloon in the TrEatment of De Novo CoronaRy Artery Disease
NCT05471245
COMPLETED
NA
Clinical Study to Evaluate the STENTYS Xposition S for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
NCT02800837
UNKNOWN
The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry
NCT03085823
COMPLETED
Sirolimus-coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent in Native Coronary Vessels
NCT04893291
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Paclitaxel Releasing Balloon in Patients Presenting With In-Stent Restenosis
NCT00961181
COMPLETED
NA
Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus-coated Coronary Balloon Dilatation Catheter for De Novo Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
NCT06822712
RECRUITING
NA
Comparison of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons Against Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Elective PCI Using OCT
NCT02607241
TERMINATED
PHASE4
Bioresorbable Sirolimus-eluting scaffold in de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT07022587
RECRUITING
NA