Identifying Personalized Brain States Predicting Residual Corticospinal Tract Output After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT06365099

Last Updated: 2025-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-02

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions could feasibly strengthen residual corticospinal tract (CST) connections and promote poststroke hand motor recovery. To maximize the effects of such interventions, they must be delivered during brain activity patterns during which TMS best activates the residual CST and enhances its neural transmission. This approach is termed brain state-dependent TMS. The investigators have recently developed a machine learning framework that identifies personalized brain activity patterns reflecting strong CST activation in neurotypical adults. In this study, the investigators will apply this framework to the poststroke brain for the first time. They will also evaluate relationships between this framework's ability to detect strong and weak CST activation states and measures of CST pathway integrity.

Participants will visit the laboratory for two days of testing that are separated by at least one night of sleep. On Day 1, participants will provide their informed consent. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool and the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test will be used to evaluate consent capacity and confirm the presence of expressive aphasia as needed. Afterwards, participants will complete eligibility screening and clinical assessment of upper extremity motor impairment, motor function, and disability using the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment, the Wolf Motor Function Test, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Participants will then be screened for the presence of residual CST connections from the lesioned hemisphere to the affected first dorsal interosseous muscle. Recording electrodes will be attached to this muscle in order to record TMS-evoked twitches in these muscles. During this procedure, single-pulse TMS will be applied to each point of a 1 cm resolution grid covering primary and secondary motor areas of the lesioned hemisphere at maximum stimulator output. If TMS reliably elicits a muscle twitch in the affected first dorsal interosseous, that participant will be considered to have residual CST connections and will be eligible for the full study. If no muscle twitch is observed, the participant will not be eligible for the full study. Afterwards, recording electrodes will be removed and the participant will leave the laboratory.

On Day 2, participants will return to the laboratory. The investigators will confirm continued eligibility and place recording electrodes on the scalp using a swim-type cap. The investigators will also place recording electrodes on the affected first dorsal interosseous as well as the affected abductor pollicis brevis and extensor digitorum communis muscles. After identifying the scalp location at which TMS best elicits muscle twitches in the affected first dorsal interosseous muscle, the investigators will determine the lowest possible TMS intensity that such evokes muscle twitches at least half of the time. Then, the investigators will deliver 6 blocks of 100 single TMS pulses while participants rest quietly with their eyes open. Stimulation will be delivered at an intensity that is 20% greater than the lowest possible TMS intensity that evokes muscle twitches at least half the time. Afterwards, all electrodes will be removed, participation will be complete, and participants will leave the laboratory.

The investigators will recruit a total of 20 chronic stroke survivors for this study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single-pulse TMS

Single-pulse TMS will be applied to the lesioned hemisphere while participants rest quietly with their eyes open

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presence of residual upper extremity hemiparesis, defined as any of the following Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Score \<66 Wolf Motor Function Test Score \<70 Affected hand performance on the 9-Hole Peg Test \>= 10% worse than unaffected hand Affected hand pinch, key, or power grip performance \>= 10% worse than unaffected hand
* Occurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke \>= 6 months before participation
* Willingness and ability to provide informed consent
* No history of neurological disease and/or neurological injury other than stroke
* No TMS contraindications, including but not limited to:

Cardiac pacemaker Cochlear implant Cortical stimulator Deep brain stimulator Vagus nerve stimulator Cervical spine epidural stimulation Ventriculoperitoneal shunt Ferromagnetic metallic implants above the level of the seventh cervical vertebra Seizure in the last 12 months while taking anti-epilepsy medication History of adverse reactions to TMS or peripheral nerve stimulation Current, suspected, or planned pregnancy Any recent changes (within the last month) to medication use

\- Presence of residual corticospinal connections innervating an affected upper extremity muscle following stimulation of the lesioned hemisphere (i.e., MEP+), evaluated at rest
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Texas at Austin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas at Austin

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sara Hussain

Role: primary

512-232-2686

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00000896_Exp2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain State-dependent PCMS in Chronic Stroke
NCT04830163 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2