Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of Gluteus Nerves to Improve Hip Strength and Power

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to evaluate whether the ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation through a needle results in greater gains in strength and power compared to the administration of current through surface electrodes in patients undergoing strength and power assessments. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does percutaneous stimulation of the superior and inferior gluteal nerves using ultrasound-guided needles enhance strength and power more effectively than transcutaneous stimulation through electrodes?

Is the effectiveness of current delivery significantly different between percutaneous and transcutaneous methods when assessed with a linear encoder in a standarized hip extension exercise?

Participants will:

Be randomized into two groups: one undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous stimulation of the gluteal nerves (experimental group) and the other undergoing transcutaneous stimulation through electrodes (control group).

The same stimulation protocol at 10 Hz frequency with the maximum muscle contraction evoked without pain will be performed in both groups. Then, the participants will undergo strength and power assessment before and after therapy administration using a linear encoder in a hip extension exercise.

Researchers will compare the experimental group to the control group to see if the method of current delivery (percutaneous vs. transcutaneous) has a significant impact on the gains in strength and power. This comparison is based on the hypothesis that percutaneous delivery of current, guided by ultrasound, is more effective than simply positioning a surface electrode for transcutaneous stimulation. The evaluation of strength and power will be performed through a linear encoder that measures peak strength and concentric power in each repetition, conducted by a blind operator unaware of the patients' group allocations.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation on the Superior Gluteal Nerve in Patients With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Pilot Study

NCT06529783

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome

RECRUITING NA

Effects of Percutaneous Neuromouldation of the Saphenous Nerve in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain

NCT06505382

Patellofemoral Pain

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Comparison of 3 Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Catheter Insertion

NCT00927368

Total Knee Replacement Surgery

COMPLETED NA

Monitoring of Intensity of Stimulation and Injection Pressure in US Guided Peripheral Nerve Block According to Anatomic Needle Type Position

NCT03430453

Orthopedic Surgery

COMPLETED NA

Percutaneous Neuromodulation on the Anterior Pain Knee

NCT03883737

Neuromodulation Anterior Pain Knee Femoral Nerve

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study delves into the comparative efficacy of two modalities of nerve stimulation for enhancing muscular strength and power: the percutaneous application of electrical current via acupuncture needles versus traditional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). The overarching objective is to discern whether percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (pPNS), guided by ultrasound, facilitates superior gains in muscle strength and power in the gluteal muscles compared to conventional TENS.

Participants, suffering from chronic knee pain, were systematically randomized into two cohorts: the experimental group underwent ultrasound-guided pPNS targeting the superior and inferior gluteal nerves, whereas the control group received TENS. The experimental setup was meticulously designed to ensure the sole variable of distinction between groups was the method of electrical stimulation applied. pPNS was delivered using a biphasic asymmetric electric current, set to a frequency of 10 Hz, a pulse width of 240 microseconds, and an intensity tailored to achieve maximal muscle contraction without inducing pain, based on a protocol of ten 10-second stimulations interspersed with 10-second rest periods. This regimen was predicated on prior findings demonstrating its efficacy in augmenting isometric strength following femoral nerve stimulation. The control group was subjected to a parallel protocol, differing only in the application technique, wherein electrodes replaced needles, adhering to the same stimulation parameters.

The therapeutic efficacy of both interventions was assessed through a rigorous evaluation of strength and power before and after the administration of therapy. This assessment employed a linear encoder to measure peak strength and concentric power during the Hip Thrust exercise, a method chosen for its reliability in quantifying these parameters. The procedure entailed performing the exercise under three different loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the participant's maximum capacity, 1RM), with the evaluation aimed at capturing the concentric peak power in each repetition until a noticeable decline in performance was observed.

The hypothesis posits that pPNS, by virtue of its targeted and invasive nature, will yield greater improvements in muscle strength and power than TENS, attributed to its more direct stimulation of the nerve fibers and the encompassing muscle groups. The underpinning rationale is that pPNS's ultrasound-guided approach allows for a more precise delivery of electrical current to the nerves, potentially overcoming limitations associated with the superficial and diffuse application of TENS.

For the analysis of the collected data, an initial evaluation of distribution characteristics will be performed utilizing visual tools such as Q-Q plots and density plots, complemented by statistical measures of kurtosis and skewness to understand the data's underlying structure. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be applied to assess the normality of residuals, ensuring the validity of subsequent statistical tests. Descriptive statistics, including the mean, median, mode, and standard deviation of the collected quantitative measures, will be thoroughly examined to summarize the data effectively. Additionally, the homogeneity of these variables across the dataset will be scrutinized.

Regarding inferential statistics, an exploratory approach will be adopted to estimate confidence intervals and discern trends in the data, particularly focusing on pre- and post-treatment differences both within individual subjects and between the groups. Due to the anticipation of non-normal data distribution and the structure of the study design (pretest-posttest control group), non-parametric statistical tests will be employed for the analysis. Specifically, the Mann-Whitney U test will facilitate between-group comparisons, while the Wilcoxon test will be used for related measurements to detect changes within groups over time.

Data analysis and visualization efforts will be supported by SPSS 23.0 software (SPSS Inc., IBM Chicago, IL, USA) and/or GraphPad Software (San Diego, CA, USA). For the interpretation of results, a 95% confidence interval and an alpha level of 0.05 will be established as thresholds for statistical significance. The creation of figures and graphical representations of the findings will be executed using Adobe Illustrator (San José, CA, USA), ensuring that the visual presentation of data is both clear and informative. This comprehensive approach to data analysis and visualization aims to elucidate the potential differences in efficacy between percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in enhancing muscle strength and power, guiding future research and clinical applications in the field.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain Chronic Knee Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This pilot study utilizes a randomized parallel-group design, focusing on procedure feasibility for future clinical trials, in line with extended CONSORT guidelines for pilot studies. Participants, selected through a convenience sampling method due to their chronic knee pain, received pre- and post-treatment evaluations to assess the effect on gluteal muscle function. Post-informed consent, participants were allocated to either TENS or ultrasound-guided percutaneous nerve stimulation via a computer-generated randomization process executed with GraphPad Software (San Diego, CA, USA), ensuring a balanced 1:1 ratio.

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

In the study, blinding will be implemented to minimize bias. The evaluating clinician will be blinded to participant group assignments, ensuring assessments are unbiased. Similarly, the data analyst will also be blinded, analyzing data without knowledge of group allocations to maintain impartiality. Data will be handled objectively, with statistical methods applied blindly to compare treatment groups. Despite challenges in completely blinding participants due to the distinct nature of interventions, every effort will be made to minimize potential bias.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

Nerves are localized at an ultrasound-guided level and with respect to the vascular-nervous package two acupuncture needles are inserted, one for each nerve. The stimulation is the same as the TENS group: 10 stimulations x 10 times x 10 seconds, evoking the maximum contraction without pain.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

In the pPNS group, the superior gluteal nerve and inferior gluteal nerve are stimulated percutaneously. The nerves are localized at an ultrasound-guided level and with respect to the vascular-nervous package two acupuncture needles are inserted, one for each nerve. The stimulation is the same as the TENS group: 10 stimulations x 10 times x 10 seconds, evoking the maximum contraction without pain.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Two surface electrodes are inserted at the level of the superior gluteal and inferior gluteal nerve tract. A protocol of 10 stimulations x 10 seconds of stimulations x 10 times is performed with a 10 second rest between each repetition. A maximum contraction evoked without pain is sought.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TENS

Intervention Type OTHER

The TENS group is subjected to transcutaneous current. Two surface electrodes are inserted at the level of the superior gluteal and inferior gluteal nerve tract. A protocol of 10 stimulations x 10 seconds of stimulations x 10 times is performed with a 10 second rest between each repetition. A maximum contraction evoked without pain is sought.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TENS

The TENS group is subjected to transcutaneous current. Two surface electrodes are inserted at the level of the superior gluteal and inferior gluteal nerve tract. A protocol of 10 stimulations x 10 seconds of stimulations x 10 times is performed with a 10 second rest between each repetition. A maximum contraction evoked without pain is sought.

Intervention Type OTHER

Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

In the pPNS group, the superior gluteal nerve and inferior gluteal nerve are stimulated percutaneously. The nerves are localized at an ultrasound-guided level and with respect to the vascular-nervous package two acupuncture needles are inserted, one for each nerve. The stimulation is the same as the TENS group: 10 stimulations x 10 times x 10 seconds, evoking the maximum contraction without pain.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult athletes above the legal age threshold
* Amateur athletes
* Experiencing chronic knee pain
* Possessing a prior diagnosis related to their knee condition
* Competent in the execution of the hip thrust exercise

Exclusion Criteria

* Underage or elderly
* Significant co-existing medical conditions and/or comorbidities
* Professional athletes
* Sedentary lifestyle
* Lack of familiarity with the hip thrust exercise
* Needle phobia or rejection to peripheral stimulation techniques
* Considerable contraindications such as a history of knee surgery, current pregnancy, or issues related to blood clotting.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No