Laser Ablation in the Treatment of High-grade Cervical Lesions

NCT ID: NCT06333743

Last Updated: 2024-03-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

308 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-31

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cervical laser ablation is an effective, minimally invasive treatment with a low incidence of perinatal complications and minimal impact on fertility. Research has confirmed that laser ablation treatment of cervical HSIL (including CIN2 and CIN3) is effective and feasible and is useful for young CIN3 patients who wish to get pregnant in the future. There have been no randomized clinical trials of laser ablation therapy for cervical HSIL in Chinese women. This study focuses on the application of laser ablation in the treatment of cervical HSIL, explores the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of laser ablation in the treatment of cervical HSIL, and strives to promote the reasonable application of laser ablation in the treatment of cervical HSIL.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Background This study focuses on the application of laser ablation in the treatment of cervical HSIL, explores the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of laser ablation in the treatment of cervical HSIL, and strives to promote the reasonable application of laser ablation in the treatment of cervical HSIL.
2. Research objects Young patients with cervical HSIL underwent colposcopic evaluation, completed cervical biopsy, and were pathologically confirmed to be eligible for ablation.
3. Methods 3.1 Sample size This study was a randomized controlled trial with parallel design. HSIL recurrence rate was the primary endpoint. According to previous literature reports, it is estimated that the recurrence rate of HSIL in the laser treatment group is 15%. The recurrence rate of HSIL in the resection group was 5%. Let α=0.05 (both sides), hold =0.80. Using PASS 11 software, the sample size of both groups was 138 cases. Assuming that the loss of follow-up rate of the study subjects was 10%, the sample size of each group was 138÷0.9=154 cases. Therefore, 308 patients were intended to be included in the study.

3.2 Statistical methods SPSS 24.0 software will be used for statistical analysis of all data. Measurement data with normal distribution will be described by mean ± standard deviation. Independent sample t-test or rank sum test will be used for inter-group comparison, and paired sample t-test will be used for intra-group comparison before and after treatment. Counting data will be expressed as examples or percentages (%), and the Chi-square test will be used for comparison between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to calculate the recurrence rate, and the rank sum test will be used to evaluate the difference between the two groups. Cox regression model will be used to analyze the factors influencing prognosis. P \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
4. Results The primary endpoint is the HSIL recurrence rate at 12 months after treatment.

Other subjects were secondary study endpoints shown as follows:

Intraoperative and postoperative complications and side effects, including bleeding, pain, infection, cervical secretions, and healing; Psychological state change; Satisfaction; Cervical length; Recurrence rate; Fees

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

laser ablation treatment

Laser vaporization is performed using a carbon dioxide laser under colposcopy. All patients received 1% mepivacaine hydrochloride paracervix block. No general anesthesia was used. Before laser vaporization began, scaly columnar nodules were visible in all patients. The evaporation depth is 8-10mm, and the edge is 5mm from the abnormal discovery or transition area.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

laser ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Research has confirmed that laser ablation treatment of cervical HSIL is effective and feasible.

LEEP or conization treatment

The cervix was stained with iodine solution and the diseased lesion was visualized. LEEP or conization was performed to a depth of approximately 1.5 cm to resect disease in the cervical canal.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LEEP or Conization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The most common treatment for HSIL is LEEP or conization of the cervical lesion, but there are several perinatal complications involved in this surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laser ablation

Research has confirmed that laser ablation treatment of cervical HSIL is effective and feasible.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LEEP or Conization

The most common treatment for HSIL is LEEP or conization of the cervical lesion, but there are several perinatal complications involved in this surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. \< 40-year-old
2. Cervical HSIL confirmed by colposcopic biopsy pathology
3. Cervical transformation zone type 1 or 2
4. The lesion is completely visible and does not extend into the cervical canal, and the lesion area is less than 50% of the cervical surface area
5. Colposcopic evaluation ruled out invasive cancer
6. Voluntary participation in the study with full and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Cervical transformation zone type 3
2. Glandular epithelial lesions
3. Lesions greater than 50% of cervical surface area, or with vaginal and vulvar intraepithelial lesions
4. The upper margin of the lesion was not visible or extended into the cervical canal
5. Cervical tube sampling was diagnosed with CIN2+ or CIN that could not be graded
6. Cervical biopsy is not sufficient to confirm a tissue diagnosis
7. Suspected invasive cancer
8. History of cervical surgery
9. Pregnancy or planning a pregnancy during study participation
10. Autoimmune or immune deficiency diseases
11. Long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs
Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lan Zhu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lan Zhu, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-010-69156874

Jinhui Wang, MD

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, Chelmow D, Einstein MH, Garcia F, Huh WK, Kim JJ, Moscicki AB, Nayar R, Saraiya M, Sawaya GF, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M; 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines Committee. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr;24(2):102-131. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32243307 (View on PubMed)

Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA. 2004 May 5;291(17):2100-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.17.2100.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15126438 (View on PubMed)

Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006 Feb 11;367(9509):489-98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16473126 (View on PubMed)

Fallani MG, Penna C, Fambrini M, Marchionni M. Laser CO2 vaporization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a long-term follow-up series. Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Oct;91(1):130-3. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00440-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14529672 (View on PubMed)

Mariya T, Nishikawa A, Sogawa K, Suzuki R, Saito M, Kawamata A, Shimizu A, Nihei T, Sonoda T, Saito T. Virological and cytological clearance in laser vaporization and conization for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade 3. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Dec;42(12):1808-1813. doi: 10.1111/jog.13113. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27526956 (View on PubMed)

Zhang L, Sauvaget C, Mosquera I, Basu P. Efficacy, acceptability and safety of ablative versus excisional procedure in the treatment of histologically confirmed CIN2/3: A systematic review. BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(2):153-161. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17251. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35689493 (View on PubMed)

Yoon BS, Seong SJ, Song T, Kim ML, Kim MK. Risk factors for treatment failure of CO2 laser vaporization in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jul;290(1):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3148-1. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24458427 (View on PubMed)

Kodama K, Yahata H, Okugawa K, Tomonobe H, Yasutake N, Yoshida S, Yagi H, Yasunaga M, Ohgami T, Onoyama I, Asanoma K, Hori E, Shimokawa M, Kato K. Prognostic outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after laser vaporization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a single-center retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;26(4):770-776. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01848-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33394202 (View on PubMed)

Inaba K, Nagasaka K, Kawana K, Arimoto T, Matsumoto Y, Tsuruga T, Mori-Uchino M, Miura S, Sone K, Oda K, Nakagawa S, Yano T, Kozuma S, Fujii T. High-risk human papillomavirus correlates with recurrence after laser ablation for treatment of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a long-term follow-up retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Feb;40(2):554-60. doi: 10.1111/jog.12196. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24118526 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549182/

WHO guidelines for the use of thermal ablation for cervical pre-cancer lesions

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZhuLan

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Imiquimod Treatment of CIN Lesions
NCT02329171 TERMINATED PHASE3