Laser Ablation in the Treatment of High-grade Cervical Lesions
NCT ID: NCT06333743
Last Updated: 2024-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
308 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-31
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Focal Ablation of Cervical Precancer
NCT01709773
Research on the Application of Patient Navigation-based Management Model of Patients After LEEP
NCT06695871
Conservative Management of HSIL in Patients With Future Pregnancy Aspiration
NCT04783805
Local Hyperthermia for the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasias
NCT03436251
A Cohort Study for the Following up of Conization
NCT03961178
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Research objects Young patients with cervical HSIL underwent colposcopic evaluation, completed cervical biopsy, and were pathologically confirmed to be eligible for ablation.
3. Methods 3.1 Sample size This study was a randomized controlled trial with parallel design. HSIL recurrence rate was the primary endpoint. According to previous literature reports, it is estimated that the recurrence rate of HSIL in the laser treatment group is 15%. The recurrence rate of HSIL in the resection group was 5%. Let α=0.05 (both sides), hold =0.80. Using PASS 11 software, the sample size of both groups was 138 cases. Assuming that the loss of follow-up rate of the study subjects was 10%, the sample size of each group was 138÷0.9=154 cases. Therefore, 308 patients were intended to be included in the study.
3.2 Statistical methods SPSS 24.0 software will be used for statistical analysis of all data. Measurement data with normal distribution will be described by mean ± standard deviation. Independent sample t-test or rank sum test will be used for inter-group comparison, and paired sample t-test will be used for intra-group comparison before and after treatment. Counting data will be expressed as examples or percentages (%), and the Chi-square test will be used for comparison between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to calculate the recurrence rate, and the rank sum test will be used to evaluate the difference between the two groups. Cox regression model will be used to analyze the factors influencing prognosis. P \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
4. Results The primary endpoint is the HSIL recurrence rate at 12 months after treatment.
Other subjects were secondary study endpoints shown as follows:
Intraoperative and postoperative complications and side effects, including bleeding, pain, infection, cervical secretions, and healing; Psychological state change; Satisfaction; Cervical length; Recurrence rate; Fees
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
laser ablation treatment
Laser vaporization is performed using a carbon dioxide laser under colposcopy. All patients received 1% mepivacaine hydrochloride paracervix block. No general anesthesia was used. Before laser vaporization began, scaly columnar nodules were visible in all patients. The evaporation depth is 8-10mm, and the edge is 5mm from the abnormal discovery or transition area.
laser ablation
Research has confirmed that laser ablation treatment of cervical HSIL is effective and feasible.
LEEP or conization treatment
The cervix was stained with iodine solution and the diseased lesion was visualized. LEEP or conization was performed to a depth of approximately 1.5 cm to resect disease in the cervical canal.
LEEP or Conization
The most common treatment for HSIL is LEEP or conization of the cervical lesion, but there are several perinatal complications involved in this surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
laser ablation
Research has confirmed that laser ablation treatment of cervical HSIL is effective and feasible.
LEEP or Conization
The most common treatment for HSIL is LEEP or conization of the cervical lesion, but there are several perinatal complications involved in this surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Cervical HSIL confirmed by colposcopic biopsy pathology
3. Cervical transformation zone type 1 or 2
4. The lesion is completely visible and does not extend into the cervical canal, and the lesion area is less than 50% of the cervical surface area
5. Colposcopic evaluation ruled out invasive cancer
6. Voluntary participation in the study with full and informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Glandular epithelial lesions
3. Lesions greater than 50% of cervical surface area, or with vaginal and vulvar intraepithelial lesions
4. The upper margin of the lesion was not visible or extended into the cervical canal
5. Cervical tube sampling was diagnosed with CIN2+ or CIN that could not be graded
6. Cervical biopsy is not sufficient to confirm a tissue diagnosis
7. Suspected invasive cancer
8. History of cervical surgery
9. Pregnancy or planning a pregnancy during study participation
10. Autoimmune or immune deficiency diseases
11. Long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University
OTHER
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lan Zhu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, Chelmow D, Einstein MH, Garcia F, Huh WK, Kim JJ, Moscicki AB, Nayar R, Saraiya M, Sawaya GF, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M; 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines Committee. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr;24(2):102-131. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525. No abstract available.
Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA. 2004 May 5;291(17):2100-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.17.2100.
Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006 Feb 11;367(9509):489-98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6.
Fallani MG, Penna C, Fambrini M, Marchionni M. Laser CO2 vaporization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a long-term follow-up series. Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Oct;91(1):130-3. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00440-2.
Mariya T, Nishikawa A, Sogawa K, Suzuki R, Saito M, Kawamata A, Shimizu A, Nihei T, Sonoda T, Saito T. Virological and cytological clearance in laser vaporization and conization for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade 3. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Dec;42(12):1808-1813. doi: 10.1111/jog.13113. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
Zhang L, Sauvaget C, Mosquera I, Basu P. Efficacy, acceptability and safety of ablative versus excisional procedure in the treatment of histologically confirmed CIN2/3: A systematic review. BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(2):153-161. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17251. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
Yoon BS, Seong SJ, Song T, Kim ML, Kim MK. Risk factors for treatment failure of CO2 laser vaporization in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jul;290(1):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3148-1. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
Kodama K, Yahata H, Okugawa K, Tomonobe H, Yasutake N, Yoshida S, Yagi H, Yasunaga M, Ohgami T, Onoyama I, Asanoma K, Hori E, Shimokawa M, Kato K. Prognostic outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after laser vaporization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a single-center retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;26(4):770-776. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01848-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Inaba K, Nagasaka K, Kawana K, Arimoto T, Matsumoto Y, Tsuruga T, Mori-Uchino M, Miura S, Sone K, Oda K, Nakagawa S, Yano T, Kozuma S, Fujii T. High-risk human papillomavirus correlates with recurrence after laser ablation for treatment of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a long-term follow-up retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Feb;40(2):554-60. doi: 10.1111/jog.12196. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
WHO guidelines for the use of thermal ablation for cervical pre-cancer lesions
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZhuLan
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.