Topical Imiquimod vs. LEEP for Women With Carcinoma In-situ of the Cervix

NCT ID: NCT02130323

Last Updated: 2017-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2017-05-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

OBJECTIVE: The standard of care for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to 3 (CIN 2-3) has been the excision of the cervical transformation zone by way of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization (CKC). However, it has been recognized that these procedures can increase the risks for pre-term labor in women who still desire to conceive. Recent studies have shown that medical treatment with Imiquimod, a topical immune response modulator, has significant effects on histological regression of CIN 2-3 when compared with placebo. The investigators propose that treatment with Imiquimod may be preferable offering similar outcomes on histological regression when compared with excision or ablation while potentially avoiding or reducing the number of surgical procedure that places them at risk for future pregnancies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of patients with CIN 2-3 to receive either surgical excision with LEEP or CKC versus medical therapy with Imiquimod once weekly inserted vaginally for 16 weeks. Inclusion criteria are women age 21 years or older with confirmed histological diagnosis of CIN 2-3 with a normal endocervical curettage (ECC) if obtained and satisfactory colposcopy (the transformation zone of the cervix was completely visualized.) Exclusion criteria include positive CIN2-3 on ECC, presence of cancer, pregnancy or lactation, immune deficiency, hepatitis, or hypersensitivity to Imiquimod. Patients will be randomized to receive excision with LEEP/CKC or Imiquimod 250 mg (5%) cream (12.5 mg of active ingredient) inserted vaginally once a week for 16 weeks.

The primary outcome will be histological regression to CIN 1 or less. Secondary outcomes will be complete histological regression, high-risk Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) clearance, Clearance of HPV 16, 18/45, and patient tolerance of Imiquimod regimen. Follow up with repeat pap, HPV typing to include 16 and 18/45 subtyping, and colposcopy with directed cervical biopsy will be performed at 6 months post initiation of treatment. Patients unable to complete at least 8 treatments and miss two treatments consecutively will be considered failures and offered immediate LEEP. Those patients that complete 8 treatments of Imiquimod will be reevaluated 6 months from initiating treatment. Demographic information will be obtained to include age, gravidity and parity, smoking history, and contraceptive use.

Descriptive statistics will include numbers and rates of occurrence with confidence intervals of regression, pre, and post-treatment HPV including HPV 16 and 18/45 typing, and adverse effects. The assumed regression rate for the LEEP arm varies within studies. We are choosing a conservative estimate of 85% regression rate from CIN2+ to CIN1 or less. More recently in a 2014 publication in the Journal of Virology (Author Antonio Frega, Journal of Clinical Virology 60 (2014) 39-43) 13% of the LEEP patients out of 475 had residual disease after LEEP. In this study they excluded the 10% of patients that had had positive margins on their LEEP specimen. We are not excluding them as this is intent to treat study. For Imiquimod the Grimm study found a 73.3% regression rate with those treated with the active ingredient. A non-inferiority-type design for two proportions using differences is used in which the difference between treatments is defined as medical treatment being preferable if the regression rate is not more than 15% below that of the excisional treatment. Comparison of the regression rates of the two treatments will be made by a non-inferiority Fisher's exact test.

Required sample size was assessed using the PASS software of the NCSS statistical package. Using power = 0.80 and alpha = 0.05, a power analysis predicts the need for 68 patients per arm for 136. Post-treatment HPV rates will be compared similarly. We will recruit 75 patients to each arm to buffer for a dropout rate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure

Excision of the cervical transformation zone by way of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization (CKC).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients with CIN 2-3 will be randomized to receive intervention, CKC or LEEP versus medical therapy with Imiquimod.

Imiquimod

Imiquimod 12.5mg intravaginally once weekly for 16 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Imiquimod

Intervention Type DRUG

12.5mg (5%) once a week vaginally for 16 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Imiquimod

12.5mg (5%) once a week vaginally for 16 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure

Patients with CIN 2-3 will be randomized to receive intervention, CKC or LEEP versus medical therapy with Imiquimod.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Aldara LEEP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy women older than age 21, military or civilian
* Negative pregnancy test results
* Confirmed CIN 2-3 on cervical biopsy with a negative endocervical curettage (ECC) and satisfactory colposcopy visualizing the complete transformation zone of the cervix.
* The patient will be available and in the San Diego area for 6 months after enrollment to complete the clinic visits and follow up.

Exclusion Criteria

* Positive CIN 2-3 on ECC
* Presence of cancer
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Immuno-compromised (systemic lupus erythematosus, kidney transplant)
* Hepatitis
* Hypersensitivity to Imiquimod
* Ulcerative colitis
* Crohn's disease
* Human Immunodeficiency virus
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Addie N Alkhas, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Naval Medical Center San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NMCSD.2014.0040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.