PPIO-007 Correlation Analysis of Type II Diabetes Mellitus on Short-term and Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

NCT ID: NCT06333665

Last Updated: 2025-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

605 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-20

Study Completion Date

2024-05-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To date, there is controversy as to whether type II diabetes mellitus is associated with adverse short- and long-term outcomes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. At the same time, to the best of our knowledge, the impact of metformin use and glycemic control on short- and long-term outcomes in this patient population is also controversial. Therefore, this study aims to test the hypothesis that diabetes mellitus is associated with reduced survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy and that treatment with metformin and/or good glycemic control (HbA1c\<7.0%) is associated with improved survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Esophageal cancer is one of the major components of the global cancer burden. According to the Global Cancer Statistics 2020 report, in 2020, esophageal cancer ranked ninth in the world in incidence (604,100 new cases) and sixth in overall mortality (544,076 deaths). In China, esophageal cancer ranked fifth among cancer-related causes of death in 2020, with more than 90% of esophageal cancers being esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Until now, surgery-based comprehensive treatment has remained the main mode of treatment for patients with potentially curable localized esophageal cancer. However, despite efforts to advance treatment, the five-year survival rate for patients with esophageal cancer after surgery is still low, so it is important to identify prognosis-related factors.

Diabetes is a global health problem that has reached alarming levels. In 2019, nearly half a billion people worldwide (9.3% of adults aged 20-79 years) had diabetes, with approximately 20% in the age group aged 60-75 years (the main incidence group of esophageal cancer). Diabetes mellitus is a wasting systemic disease associated with poor outcomes across multiple disease processes and is one of the greatest challenges facing healthcare systems worldwide. For malignant tumors, diabetes is not only one of the causes but also one of the risk factors for low survival. Although other cancer specialties (eg, colon, pancreatic, breast) are associated with poor oncology outcomes, it may be due to decreased immunity and increased systemic inflammation in patients with diabetes. However, there is controversy regarding the prognostic role of diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. There is evidence that patients with diabetes have an increased risk of cancer recurrence and death after surgery compared with non-diabetic controls; However, some studies have shown no significant association between T2DM and postoperative complications, suggesting that diabetes is not an independent risk factor for survival.

Metformin, a member of the biguanide family, is commonly used as an oral antihyperglycemic agent that reduces cancer risk and improves prognosis for a variety of cancers. In recent years, the use of metformin has improved survival in patients with malignant tumors. For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), several molecular mechanisms have been shown to inhibit tumor progression, for example, by inhibiting the growth of esophageal cancer cells. Metformin has also been shown to have a beneficial prognostic effect on some other tumors, such as colon, lung, and prostate cancers, in some studies. The association between metformin use and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer has been analyzed with conflicting results. A study by Van De Voorde et al. showed that the use of metformin was associated with significantly better distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival. In contrast, the results of Spierings et al. showed that metformin use did not result in higher pathologic response rates or improved overall survival or disease-free survival. They believe that contrary to the assumptions of other tumor types, metformin may not have a beneficial effect on esophageal cancer.

Studies have shown that T2DM does not appear to have a significant effect on the long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. In contrast, it may be more important to control blood glucose levels in patients with T2DM undergoing esophagectomy. At the same time, a large number of studies have confirmed that diabetic patients with poor glycemic control have a higher complication rate after esophageal cancer surgery, especially anastomotic leakage.

In summary, there is controversy as to whether type II diabetes mellitus will result in adverse short- and long-term outcomes for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. At the same time, to the best of our knowledge, the impact of metformin use and glycemic control on short- and long-term outcomes in this patient population is also controversial. Therefore, this study aims to test the hypothesis that diabetes mellitus is associated with reduced survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy and that treatment with metformin and/or good glycemic control (HbA1c\<7.0%) is associated with improved survival.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Coe-T2DM group

There was a definitive diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus before surgery

Whether there is type 2 diabetes mellitus before surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients were grouped according to whether they had type 2 diabetes mellitus before surgery

No-T2DM group

There was no clear diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus before surgery

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Whether there is type 2 diabetes mellitus before surgery

Patients were grouped according to whether they had type 2 diabetes mellitus before surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with a clear pathologic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma;
2. Received minimally invasive McKeown procedure;
3. Patients with R0 resection (R0: radical resection).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Concomitant history of other primary cancers or other cancers;
2. Distant metastases before surgery;
3. Serious comorbidities of other systems before surgery;
4. Patients diagnosed with T2DM during follow-up;
5. The medical record information is incomplete.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

WEI GUO

chief physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Army Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Wei G

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.