Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
9 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-01
2028-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Following the pilot study, the investigators will complete a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (Phase 2) to compare the efficacy of the RBSEF-CCT-MCI with the ME-CCT. In the RCT, 75-150 participants will be randomized into either 1) The active control group, who will complete the original, ME-CCT training program, or 2) The experimental group, who will complete the newly developed RBSE-CCT-MCI. Both research groups will complete the interventions for 8 weeks, with 8-10 participants per group.
Hypothesis: Participation in this newly developed/updated intervention (i.e., RBSEF-CCT-MCI) will result in improvements in both (a) subjective and (b) objective cognitive functioning, and (c) self-reported mental health symptoms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computerized Cognitive Training for MCI
NCT03232047
CBT for African Americans With Cognitive Impairment
NCT03384069
Vision-based Speed of Processing Cognitive Training and Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT02559063
Does Cognitive Rehabilitation Demonstrate Benefits in the Group Setting With People Whom Have Experienced Brain Injury?
NCT00166348
Preventing Cognitive Decline in African Americans With Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT01299766
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When compared to the general aging population, AA adults experience disproportionately higher rates of hypertension as well as both an earlier age of onset and higher concomitant morbidity and mortality from hypertension when compared to any other racial/ethnic group in the US. AA individuals experience greater exposure to specific chronic stressors, such as discrimination and low socioeconomic status, as well as report higher overall levels of stress compared to white individuals. However, racial disparities in hypertension rates persist even after controlling for socioeconomic status. Researchers have failed to demonstrate any risk factors that are biologically unique to AA patients. These findings have led researchers to consider other psychosocial and environmental factors that may explain the observed hypertension disparities, namely, racial discrimination and racial segregation.
AA older adults are not only at higher risk for non-normative cognitive decline due to both semi-direct (i.e., increased risk of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular risk factors, such as HTN), but other factors such as race-related stress may not only exacerbate these risk factors, but also interfere day-to-day with optimal cognitive performance due to overall increased stress and diversion of cognitive resources. Therefore, for AA older adults, there is an increased need not only for interventions that help to compensate for cognitive decline and increase daily functioning, but also an increased need for an intervention to reduce the effects of race-related stressors. The proposed Race-Based Stress and Empowerment Focused Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (RBSEF-CCT-MCI) as proposed in this pilot, is one such intervention that would accomplish those aims and has the potential for a significant impact on patient care for AA older adults who could benefit from additional tools and strategies to improve cognitive functioning and increase day-to-day independent functioning.
Of note, original authors of both protocols have granted consent for modifications of their interventions, and the investigators already have a draft of the new protocol.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental: RBSEF-CCT-MCI
Participants will complete the newly developed RBSE-CCT-MCI training program.
Race Based Stress and Empowerment Focused Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (RBSEF-CCT-MCI)
RBSEF-CCT-MCI differs from ME-CCT in that this intervention integrates psychoeducation and strategies for processing and coping with race/ethnicity-related stressors, as part of the larger conversation in ME-CCT regarding stress, and how stress interferes with attention, learning, and subsequently one's subjective sense of memory.
Control Group: ME-CCT
Participants will complete the original, ME-CCT training program.
Motivationally Enhanced Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ME-CCT)
ME-CCT focuses on:
1. Cognitive training, psychotherapeutic, and lifestyle techniques.
2. Incorporates CCT techniques designed to help patients manage problems with memory, attention, and executive functions (i.e., organization, planning, decision-making, and problem-solving).
3. Includes mindfulness-based stress reduction practice which has been shown to improve cognitive and neuropsychiatric function in various populations.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Race Based Stress and Empowerment Focused Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (RBSEF-CCT-MCI)
RBSEF-CCT-MCI differs from ME-CCT in that this intervention integrates psychoeducation and strategies for processing and coping with race/ethnicity-related stressors, as part of the larger conversation in ME-CCT regarding stress, and how stress interferes with attention, learning, and subsequently one's subjective sense of memory.
Motivationally Enhanced Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ME-CCT)
ME-CCT focuses on:
1. Cognitive training, psychotherapeutic, and lifestyle techniques.
2. Incorporates CCT techniques designed to help patients manage problems with memory, attention, and executive functions (i.e., organization, planning, decision-making, and problem-solving).
3. Includes mindfulness-based stress reduction practice which has been shown to improve cognitive and neuropsychiatric function in various populations.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The study will initially be limited to participants who self-identify as Black/African American, or who self-identify with other racial/ethnic groups in addition to self-identifying as Black/African-American; however, may be expanded to include participants that identify as Hispanic/Latine.
Exclusion Criteria
* Participants will also be excluded if they have a diagnosis of dementia (i.e., major neurocognitive disorder), intellectual disability, mild head injury (i.e., concussion) within the last six months, and/or a history of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.
* Diagnosis of dementia may be from self-report or other medical records, or for participants to fail screening cognitive assessments (i.e., the RBANS) that would suggest they may be at the level of dementia (i.e., major neurocognitive disorder) as ultimately determined by study PI with objective scores less then 2 standard deviations below the mean on the RBANS.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rachael Ellison
Principle Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rachael L Ellison, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Rachael Ellison, PhD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Huckans M, Hutson L, Twamley E, Jak A, Kaye J, Storzbach D. Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation therapies for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in older adults: working toward a theoretical model and evidence-based interventions. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013 Mar;23(1):63-80. doi: 10.1007/s11065-013-9230-9. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
Nayak US. Design participation by the thousand elders. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;48:423-7. No abstract available.
Kremer A, Focaccia G, Ferreyra R, Kraly A, Sniechowski T. [The epidemiology of cancer in the Province of Neuquen, Argentina]. Medicina (B Aires). 1987;47(5):471-6. No abstract available. Spanish.
Fritsch J, Wolf P. [Cog-rail extension corset in the surgical management of scoliosis]. Beitr Orthop Traumatol. 1973 Feb;20(2):124-7. No abstract available. German.
Spruill TM, Butler MJ, Thomas SJ, Tajeu GS, Kalinowski J, Castaneda SF, Langford AT, Abdalla M, Blackshear C, Allison M, Ogedegbe G, Sims M, Shimbo D. Association Between High Perceived Stress Over Time and Incident Hypertension in Black Adults: Findings From the Jackson Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e012139. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012139. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
Inoue S. Uptake of 3-H-DL-leucine and 3-H-uridine by the caudal neurosecretory system of the loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) maintained in vitro. Endocrinol Jpn. 1968 Dec;15(4):505-7. doi: 10.1507/endocrj1954.15.505. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RBSEF-MCI-CCT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.