Growing Strong Study of Unconditional Cash Transfers Plus Peer Support for Families With Babies in Homeless Shelters
NCT ID: NCT06323967
Last Updated: 2025-06-27
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
RECRUITING
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
200 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2024-05-21
Study Completion Date
2028-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The Growing Strong program tests a novel approach to helping families with young children living in homeless shelters, namely offering guaranteed, unconditional cash gifts that families can use as they wish plus voluntary peer support. The assumption behind this approach is that families know best how to allocate resources to meet their own individual needs. While there are a number of Direct Cash Transfer studies taking place around the country, the investigator(s) are unaware of any that have tested the relationship of receiving cash on homelessness among families specifically. To be eligible to participate in the study, families must reside in a homeless shelter and have at least one child under two years of age living with them in shelter. The investigator(s) have tied eligibility to the age of the youngest child in the household because rates of shelter use are highest among this population and because the costs associated with young children increase such families' financial burdens.
A total of 200 families will be enrolled in the study. One hundred families in the active intervention group will receive $1,500 per month ("substantial cash") for 24 months ($18,000 annually) and may also elect to receive peer support services. One hundred families in the active comparison group will receive $50 per month ("nominal cash") for 24 months ($600 annually) and will not have access to the peer support services. A third, passive comparison group will receive usual care within the homeless shelter system in the same metropolitan area (New York City) as participants in both cash gift groups. This group of families will be followed only in administrative records.
The main research questions are: does providing substantial, unconditional cash transfers plus access to voluntary peer support services over 24 months a) reduce the length of time in shelter for families with young children and/or b) improve other aspects of family and child well-being relative to providing nominal cash transfers alone or usual care.
A total of 200 families will be enrolled in the study. One hundred families in the active intervention group will receive $1,500 per month ("substantial cash") for 24 months ($18,000 annually) and may also elect to receive peer support services. One hundred families in the active comparison group will receive $50 per month ("nominal cash") for 24 months ($600 annually) and will not have access to the peer support services. A third, passive comparison group will receive usual care within the homeless shelter system in the same metropolitan area (New York City) as participants in both cash gift groups. This group of families will be followed only in administrative records.
The main research questions are: does providing substantial, unconditional cash transfers plus access to voluntary peer support services over 24 months a) reduce the length of time in shelter for families with young children and/or b) improve other aspects of family and child well-being relative to providing nominal cash transfers alone or usual care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Collaboration to Promote Early Childhood Well Being in Families Experiencing Homelessness
NCT03530137
Families Experiencing Homelessness With Children Under 48 Months of Age
COMPLETED
NA
Helping Families Pilot of a Family Resilience Program for Families Experiencing Homelessness
NCT04273126
Family Relationship
Coping Skills
COMPLETED
NA
The Impact of Family CTI on Homeless Children
NCT00055081
Mental Health
COMPLETED
NA
Strengths to Grow - Preteen: An Online Parenting Resource
NCT05582057
Mental Health Wellness 1
UNKNOWN
NA
Impacts of Cash Transfers on Child Neurodevelopment (Auxilio Brasil)
NCT05477901
Inflammation
HPA
CBCL
+1 more
RECRUITING
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the Growing Strong study, 200 families residing in the Women in Need (Win) homeless shelter system who have at least one child under two years of age living with them in shelter and who have been found "eligible" for shelter by New York City will participate. Families will be assigned to one of two cash gift conditions. One hundred families will be assigned to the active intervention group and will receive $1,500 per month via debit card for 24 months ($18,000 annually) to use as they wish along with access to free, voluntary peer support services. One hundred families will be assigned to the active comparison group and receive $50 per month via debit card for 24 months ($600 annually) to use as they wish but will not have access to the peer support services. A passive comparison group will be constructed from the administrative data of propensity-matched families within in the New York City homeless shelter system who would have met the criteria to participate in the study had they resided in one of the Win target shelters. This study is funded by a grant to Win from a private foundation, thus all target shelters are operated by Win.
Design
The Growing Strong study design is quasi-experimental with intentional assignment at the shelter level rather than experimental with random assignment at the family or shelter level for several reasons. Participants were not randomized at the family level in order to eliminate the possibility that comparably situated families living in the same shelter could enroll in the study and yet receive very different cash amounts. Participants were not randomized at the shelter level because there were too few shelters in the final design for randomization to balance the characteristics of families across conditions in expectation. The overall sample size for families was limited by the substantial cost of the intervention (between $600 - $18,000 plus costs of peer support annually per family).
Families can be assigned to treatment conditions based on their shelter placements because New York City makes placement decisions in a quasi-random fashion based on the availability and size of shelter rooms/apartments. Initially the investigator(s) selected three shelters within the Win shelter system that are as closely matched as possible on room sizes and other characteristics that affect placements. When recruitment went more slowly than anticipated, additional shelters in the Win system were included. Assignment to treatment groups is dependent solely on the shelter where the family is assigned by the New York City Department of Social Services, which depends on availability and room size. We have sought to balance shelters assigned to treatment and comparison groups by the sizes of rooms. The underlying, quasi-random City placement process should equate the two groups in expectation. The investigator(s) will check whether families in the two groups are in fact well-matched and control for any differences between them during analysis if needed.
Procedures
As the shelter operator, Win has information about families who are deemed eligible for shelter, including information to determine whether a family meets the Growing Strong eligibility criteria. Win administrative staff will notify the Win staff member who is the liaison to the study when a family meets the criteria to participate. This staff member will explain the study to families. Families who meet the criteria and would like to learn more will be referred for potential enrollment.
Families who choose to enroll will take part in a baseline survey and be invited to participate in follow-up surveys 6, 18 and 30 months later. The baseline survey collects data on demographic characteristics, family composition, work experience, income, finances, adult health and well-being (including use of alcohol and drugs), food security, social support, parenting, family routines, and child development. Measures refer to the adult participant (typically the mother), the family as a whole, or the young child who makes the family eligible for the study (the target child). Follow-up surveys mostly consist of the same measures taken at baseline plus additional information about housing and neighborhoods. The 30-month follow-up survey, which will take place 6 months after the family has stopped receiving cash, will also examine how the family is faring without the cash support.
The research team will conduct qualitative interviews with 15 families in each of the active study groups. These 30 families will be representative of the overall sample with respect to demographic characteristics. The qualitative interviews will ask about respondents' experiences in the study, including the cash (e.g., what they used it for, how it changed things for them) and the peer support services (e.g., did services help them to get out of shelter and, if so, how). In addition to probing the topics in the quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews will ask about respondents' goals and family processes. Qualitative interviews will take place 6, 18, and 30 months after enrollment.
Families who choose to enroll in the study will provide consent for us to collect administrative data for members of their household from various state and local agencies. Administrative data will include length of stay in shelters, returns to shelter, involvement with child protective services, income from employment, and emergency and routine health care, among other things. Administrative data will be used to compare outcomes for the families enrolled in Growing Strong to those of similar families outside of the study who receive usual care in the New York City homeless shelter system. Administrative data will be collected by New York City's Center for Innovation through Data Intelligence (CIDI).
Safeguards
Growing Strong has received a waiver from New York State that exempts cash gifts from the study in income calculations for benefits provided or mediated by the state (e.g., TANF) for as long as the participant is enrolled. Though families are not expected to withdraw from the study, they may do so at any time, effectively ending the protection of the waiver if they choose to continue to receive the cash gifts (which are unconditional) after withdrawal.
In an effort to hold families harmless, the investigator(s) have developed procedures that protect families' benefits under the waiver to the greatest extent possible. More specifically, the research team will wait to collect all administrative data except shelter exit time until after families have received their cash gifts in full (e.g., after 24 months of participation). Thus, any families who wish to withdraw from the study can time the withdrawal to occur after receiving the final cash gift but before administrative data are pulled for their household. A dedicated Win staff member will help families who choose to withdraw with the timing of withdrawal in order to protect/preserve their benefits under the waiver. Though the study has this safeguard in place, families are not expected to choose to withdraw from the study.
The study has also been granted a Certificate of Confidentiality from the National Institutes of Health. This means that the study cannot release or use information that identifies families in any action or suit without the agreement of the family. This protection includes civil, criminal, administrative, and/or legislative proceedings at the federal, state, and/or local level.
Outcomes
The primary outcome is length of time between families' being found eligible for shelter and shelter exit assessed with survival analysis (Cox proportional hazards).
The investigator(s) will test for differences between the active intervention and active comparison groups on additional outcomes at each follow-up point controlling for race and language of interview as covariates. If the majority of participants are not women, as anticipated, analyses will also include controls for gender. If overall differences between groups at baseline exceed chance estimates, analyses will control for baseline measures that differ beyond p \< .1. If follow-up rates fall below 90%, analyses will also control for propensity to respond to follow-up surveys in order to account for any differential attrition.
Following the practices of other studies of interventions to assist families experiencing homelessness, analyses will use a .10 level for statistical significance and not adjust for multiple testing. To avoid preferential selection of outcomes ("cherry-picking"), the investigator(s) have designated a single primary outcome and one or at most two measures per outcome domain as "key secondary outcomes" to feature in all reports.
Following the 30-month/final follow-up interview, the investigator(s) will use hierarchical linear models with time points (max = 4) nested within respondents to examine trends over time. Increases in most measures of well-being are expected as families in both groups stabilize in housing as well as treatment-by-time interactions showing the superiority of outcomes for the active intervention group.
Secondary Outcome Notation
Secondary outcomes have been pre-specified and grouped into the following nine domains: Housing, Target Child Development, Parenting, Family Separation, Adult Well-Being, Domestic Violence, Financial Well-Being, Employment, and Health Care. Secondary outcomes are labeled as follows in subsequent sections of the pre-registration: Domain names are prepended to outcome names and an asterisk is appended to outcomes designated as "key" secondary outcomes. For example, the key secondary outcome "Family Use of Emergency Medical Care or Hospitalization" is labeled "Health Care: Family Use of Emergency Medical Care or Hospitalization\*."
Design
The Growing Strong study design is quasi-experimental with intentional assignment at the shelter level rather than experimental with random assignment at the family or shelter level for several reasons. Participants were not randomized at the family level in order to eliminate the possibility that comparably situated families living in the same shelter could enroll in the study and yet receive very different cash amounts. Participants were not randomized at the shelter level because there were too few shelters in the final design for randomization to balance the characteristics of families across conditions in expectation. The overall sample size for families was limited by the substantial cost of the intervention (between $600 - $18,000 plus costs of peer support annually per family).
Families can be assigned to treatment conditions based on their shelter placements because New York City makes placement decisions in a quasi-random fashion based on the availability and size of shelter rooms/apartments. Initially the investigator(s) selected three shelters within the Win shelter system that are as closely matched as possible on room sizes and other characteristics that affect placements. When recruitment went more slowly than anticipated, additional shelters in the Win system were included. Assignment to treatment groups is dependent solely on the shelter where the family is assigned by the New York City Department of Social Services, which depends on availability and room size. We have sought to balance shelters assigned to treatment and comparison groups by the sizes of rooms. The underlying, quasi-random City placement process should equate the two groups in expectation. The investigator(s) will check whether families in the two groups are in fact well-matched and control for any differences between them during analysis if needed.
Procedures
As the shelter operator, Win has information about families who are deemed eligible for shelter, including information to determine whether a family meets the Growing Strong eligibility criteria. Win administrative staff will notify the Win staff member who is the liaison to the study when a family meets the criteria to participate. This staff member will explain the study to families. Families who meet the criteria and would like to learn more will be referred for potential enrollment.
Families who choose to enroll will take part in a baseline survey and be invited to participate in follow-up surveys 6, 18 and 30 months later. The baseline survey collects data on demographic characteristics, family composition, work experience, income, finances, adult health and well-being (including use of alcohol and drugs), food security, social support, parenting, family routines, and child development. Measures refer to the adult participant (typically the mother), the family as a whole, or the young child who makes the family eligible for the study (the target child). Follow-up surveys mostly consist of the same measures taken at baseline plus additional information about housing and neighborhoods. The 30-month follow-up survey, which will take place 6 months after the family has stopped receiving cash, will also examine how the family is faring without the cash support.
The research team will conduct qualitative interviews with 15 families in each of the active study groups. These 30 families will be representative of the overall sample with respect to demographic characteristics. The qualitative interviews will ask about respondents' experiences in the study, including the cash (e.g., what they used it for, how it changed things for them) and the peer support services (e.g., did services help them to get out of shelter and, if so, how). In addition to probing the topics in the quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews will ask about respondents' goals and family processes. Qualitative interviews will take place 6, 18, and 30 months after enrollment.
Families who choose to enroll in the study will provide consent for us to collect administrative data for members of their household from various state and local agencies. Administrative data will include length of stay in shelters, returns to shelter, involvement with child protective services, income from employment, and emergency and routine health care, among other things. Administrative data will be used to compare outcomes for the families enrolled in Growing Strong to those of similar families outside of the study who receive usual care in the New York City homeless shelter system. Administrative data will be collected by New York City's Center for Innovation through Data Intelligence (CIDI).
Safeguards
Growing Strong has received a waiver from New York State that exempts cash gifts from the study in income calculations for benefits provided or mediated by the state (e.g., TANF) for as long as the participant is enrolled. Though families are not expected to withdraw from the study, they may do so at any time, effectively ending the protection of the waiver if they choose to continue to receive the cash gifts (which are unconditional) after withdrawal.
In an effort to hold families harmless, the investigator(s) have developed procedures that protect families' benefits under the waiver to the greatest extent possible. More specifically, the research team will wait to collect all administrative data except shelter exit time until after families have received their cash gifts in full (e.g., after 24 months of participation). Thus, any families who wish to withdraw from the study can time the withdrawal to occur after receiving the final cash gift but before administrative data are pulled for their household. A dedicated Win staff member will help families who choose to withdraw with the timing of withdrawal in order to protect/preserve their benefits under the waiver. Though the study has this safeguard in place, families are not expected to choose to withdraw from the study.
The study has also been granted a Certificate of Confidentiality from the National Institutes of Health. This means that the study cannot release or use information that identifies families in any action or suit without the agreement of the family. This protection includes civil, criminal, administrative, and/or legislative proceedings at the federal, state, and/or local level.
Outcomes
The primary outcome is length of time between families' being found eligible for shelter and shelter exit assessed with survival analysis (Cox proportional hazards).
The investigator(s) will test for differences between the active intervention and active comparison groups on additional outcomes at each follow-up point controlling for race and language of interview as covariates. If the majority of participants are not women, as anticipated, analyses will also include controls for gender. If overall differences between groups at baseline exceed chance estimates, analyses will control for baseline measures that differ beyond p \< .1. If follow-up rates fall below 90%, analyses will also control for propensity to respond to follow-up surveys in order to account for any differential attrition.
Following the practices of other studies of interventions to assist families experiencing homelessness, analyses will use a .10 level for statistical significance and not adjust for multiple testing. To avoid preferential selection of outcomes ("cherry-picking"), the investigator(s) have designated a single primary outcome and one or at most two measures per outcome domain as "key secondary outcomes" to feature in all reports.
Following the 30-month/final follow-up interview, the investigator(s) will use hierarchical linear models with time points (max = 4) nested within respondents to examine trends over time. Increases in most measures of well-being are expected as families in both groups stabilize in housing as well as treatment-by-time interactions showing the superiority of outcomes for the active intervention group.
Secondary Outcome Notation
Secondary outcomes have been pre-specified and grouped into the following nine domains: Housing, Target Child Development, Parenting, Family Separation, Adult Well-Being, Domestic Violence, Financial Well-Being, Employment, and Health Care. Secondary outcomes are labeled as follows in subsequent sections of the pre-registration: Domain names are prepended to outcome names and an asterisk is appended to outcomes designated as "key" secondary outcomes. For example, the key secondary outcome "Family Use of Emergency Medical Care or Hospitalization" is labeled "Health Care: Family Use of Emergency Medical Care or Hospitalization\*."
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Time to Shelter Exit
Family Well-being
Child Well-being
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Parallel assignment to 1) active treatment and 2) active comparison. A third, passive comparison group will be constructed and followed anonymously via administrative records.
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
TRIPLE
Participants
Caregivers
Outcome Assessors
Participants will be blind to condition at the baseline assessment but will be unmasked immediately afterwards (they will receive debit cards and learn whether they are eligible for peer support). At baseline, interviewers will likely be aware of study conditions because they will interview respondents at shelters and shelter is associated with condition. At subsequent assessments interviewers will remain blind to study condition to the extent possible, but may well learn the condition from respondents, especially those who complete qualitative interviews. Win staff who provide usual care to both groups will be blind to the study condition. Participants in the passive comparison group will be unaware of the study.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Large unconditional cash transfers plus voluntary peer support
These participants will receive monthly cash transfers of $1,500 via debit card for 24 months and can elect to participate in peer support services plus usual care from shelter staff.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Large unconditional cash transfers plus voluntary peer support.
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
These participants will receive monthly cash transfers of $1,500 ($750 twice per month) via debit card for 24 months and can elect to participate in peer support services plus usual care from shelter staff.
Nominal cash transfers
These participants will receive monthly cash transfers of $50 via debit card for 24 months plus usual care from shelter staff.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Nominal cash transfers
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
These participants will receive monthly cash transfers of $50 via debit card for 24 months plus usual care from shelter staff.
Passive comparison
These propensity-matched families will reside in other New York City shelters and will be followed anonymously in administrative records only. The will receive usual care from shelter staff.
Group Type
OTHER
Passive comparison group
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
These families will receive usual care from shelter staff. They will be followed anonymously in administrative records only.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Large unconditional cash transfers plus voluntary peer support.
These participants will receive monthly cash transfers of $1,500 ($750 twice per month) via debit card for 24 months and can elect to participate in peer support services plus usual care from shelter staff.
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Nominal cash transfers
These participants will receive monthly cash transfers of $50 via debit card for 24 months plus usual care from shelter staff.
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Passive comparison group
These families will receive usual care from shelter staff. They will be followed anonymously in administrative records only.
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A family has been found "eligible" for shelter (as described above) within the past 30 days
* The family has a baby who meets the age criteria (under 2 years of age)
* There is an adult 18 or over who has custody of the child (typically the mother)
* The family speaks English or Spanish
* The family lives in a designated Win shelter
* The family has a baby who meets the age criteria (under 2 years of age)
* There is an adult 18 or over who has custody of the child (typically the mother)
* The family speaks English or Spanish
* The family lives in a designated Win shelter
Exclusion Criteria
* None: any family configuration is permissible
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Women in Need (Win)
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
The Samuels Group
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
New York City Center for Innovation through Data Intelligence (CIDI)
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Beth Shinn
Professor, Department of Human and Organizational Development
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marybeth Shinn, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Win NYC Shelter System
New York, New York, United States
Site Status
RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United States
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (24 July 2023). AAP Schedule of Well-Child Care Visits. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/safety-prevention/immunizations/pages/Recommended-Immunization-Schedules.aspx
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2023). All About the Recommended Immunization Schedules. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/safety-prevention/immunizations/pages/Recommended-Immunization-Schedules.aspx
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Baby's First Years. (n.d.). https://www.babysfirstyears.com
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cherpitel CJ. Screening for alcohol problems in the emergency room: a rapid alcohol problems screen. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995 Dec;40(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01199-4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2017). CFPB Financial Well-Being Scale. https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/bcfp_fin-well-being_full-scorecard.pdf
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gennetian, L. A., Duncan, G., Fox, N. A., Magnuson, K., Halpern-Meekin, S., Noble, K. G., & Yoshikawa, H. (2022). Unconditional cash and family investments in infants: Evidence from a large-scale cash transfer experiment in the US (No. w30379). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gubits D, Shinn M, Wood M, Brown SR, Dastrup SR, Bell SH. What Interventions Work Best for Families Who Experience Homelessness? Impact Estimates from the Family Options Study. J Policy Anal Manage. 2018;37(4):735-66.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Matheny, A.P., Wachs, T. D., Ludwig, J.L., & Philips, K. (1995). Bringing Order Out of Chaos: Psychometric Characteristics of the Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16, pp.429-444.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;19(1):2-21. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rodriguez ET, Tamis-LeMonda CS. Trajectories of the home learning environment across the first 5 years: associations with children's vocabulary and literacy skills at prekindergarten. Child Dev. 2011 Jul-Aug;82(4):1058-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01614.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Skinner HA. The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav. 1982;7(4):363-71. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, Yoshinobu L, Gibb J, Langelle C, Harney P. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Apr;60(4):570-85. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.570.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Squires, J., Bricker, D. D., & Twombly, E. (2009). Ages & stages questionnaires. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (2012, September). U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form. https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/8282/short2012.pdf
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zuckerman, S. (2018). Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey, United States, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37653.v2
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
231981
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Co-production and Feasibility RCT of Intervention to Improve the Mental Health of Children With a Social Worker
NCT06003582
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Cash Transfers for People Experiencing Homelessness
NCT05372978
UNKNOWN
NA
Adolescent Mental Health Parenting Program for Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement
NCT07303062
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Family Navigator Plus for Foster Parents
NCT06978959
RECRUITING
NA
Feasibility of a Positive Parenting Program for Women Experiencing Homelessness Who Have a History of Interpersonal Violence
NCT06246773
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
Assisting Low-Income Families at Pediatric Well-Child Care Visits
NCT00397644
COMPLETED
NA
Mind Power - A CBT Based Program for Adolescents
NCT03647826
COMPLETED
NA
Navigating Resource-Constrained Systems and Communities to Promote the Behavioral Health of Black Youth
NCT04113161
UNKNOWN
NA
Using Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy to Improve the Well-Being of Adolescent Girls
NCT03966833
COMPLETED
NA
Partnerships to Demonstrate Effectiveness of Supportive Housing for Families in the Child Welfare System
NCT04596176
COMPLETED
NA
Preventing Conduct Disorder in Child Welfare
NCT03329625
COMPLETED
NA
STRENGTH Pilot Project: a Study of a Women-led, Trauma-informed Model of Outreach to Foster Equity
NCT06854770
COMPLETED
NA
Improving Future Thinking Among Mothers to Reduce Harsh Parenting and Improve Child Outcomes
NCT05229146
COMPLETED
NA
Single Session Intervention to Promote Hope
NCT06375876
RECRUITING
NA
An Assessment of Voluntary Adolescent Mental Health Screening and Referral in a Children's Hospital Emergency Department
NCT00750412
COMPLETED
NA
Trauma-Informed Peer Aggression and Dating Violence Prevention for Preteens Receiving Intensive Mental Health Services
NCT06769282
RECRUITING
NA
Implementation, Fidelity, and Outcomes Following Novel and Usual Critical Time Intervention Training
NCT02427022
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Empowering Young Parents: Building Healthy Relationships Study
NCT06576193
RECRUITING
NA
Family-centered Mental Health Promotion Intervention
NCT04453709
COMPLETED
NA
ParentCorps: Promoting Healthy Development in Children From Low Income Communities
NCT01670227
COMPLETED
NA
Chicago Parent Program for Foster and Kinship Caregivers
NCT06170047
RECRUITING
NA
Motivational Interviewing for Getting Healthy TodaY Study
NCT03410225
COMPLETED
NA
The Seattle Social Development Project: An Implementation of the Raising Healthy Children Intervention
NCT04075019
COMPLETED
NA
REstoring Mental Health Through COmmUnity-based Psychological Services in New York City
NCT04913766
RECRUITING
NA
Prevention of Childhood Maltreatment in Families With Young Children
NCT04341376
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA