Sleep Patterns and Chronotype in Children With and Without Type 1 Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT06318611
Last Updated: 2024-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
168 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-05-01
2023-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aimed to compare sleep health composite dimensions and chronotype in children and adolescents with and without T1D, and to explore the relationship between sleep and glycemic variability in T1D.
The study was designed as a prospective observational case-control study. The estimated sample size is calculated as 168.
The sleep health composite dimensions were measured using actigraphy, sleep diaries, and self- or parental reports. Sleep disturbance will be assessed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-5) Level 2-Sleep Disturbance Scale Short Form, and the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire will be used to determine the chronotype. Sleep/wake patterns were also assessed using sleep diaries. Glycemic variability was assessed using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device parameters.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sleep and Chronotype in Children With Type 1 Diabetes
NCT04978662
Assessment of Sleep and Sleep Disruptors in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
NCT05370339
Prospective Cohort Study of Children Diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes in Türkiye Between 2018 to 2022
NCT06892821
Sleep and Type 1 Diabetes
NCT02494375
The Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use on Sleep in Parents of Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01425255
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study aimed to compare sleep health composite dimensions and chronotype in children and adolescents with and without T1D, and to explore the relationship between sleep and glycemic variability in T1D.
The study was designed as a prospective observational case-control study. The estimated sample size is calculated as 168.
The sleep health composite dimensions were measured using actigraphy, sleep diaries, and self- or parental reports. This composite evaluates various dimensions of sleep, including regularity, satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration. Each dimension is assigned a code of '1' for 'good' and '0' for 'poor.' The sleep health composite is designed so that a higher score indicates better overall sleep health.
Sleep disturbances were assessed using the DSM-5 Level 2-Sleep Disturbance Scale Short Form. The DSM-5 Level 2-Sleep Disorders Scale short form was used to evaluate sleep disturbances. It is an 8-item scale that specifically evaluates sleep disorders in children and adolescents, within the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often, and 5=always). The total score ranges from 8 to 40 points, with higher scores indicating more severe sleep disturbances. Sleep/wake patterns were also assessed using sleep diaries.
The Childhood Chronotype Questionnaire was used to evaluate the chronotype in children. This 27-item questionnaire was developed for Turkish children in the light of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and the Mornings-Evenings Questionnaire. The chronotypes were classified as morning, intermediate and evening types, corresponding scores of ≤23, 24-32 and ≥33. The child form of the Childhood Chronotype Questionnaire was completed by the parent and the adolescent form was completed by the adolescent.
Glycemic variability was assessed using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device parameters. Glycemic variability was evaluated using the J index to assess the effectiveness of glycemic control (calculated as 0.001 × (mean + SD)), the low blood glucose index (LBGI) to evaluate the risk of hypoglycemia, the high blood glucose index (HBGI) to determine the likelihood of hyperglycemia, and the Coefficient of Variation (CV). The Coefficient of Variation expresses the percentage variation in blood glucose levels, with a CV ≤36% indicating a stable glucose profile and a CV \>36% indicating an unstable glucose profile. For 24-hour continuous glucose monitoring, the targeted percentages of time were \>70% at 70-180 mg/dl for glycemic control, \<4% at \<70 mg/dl for hypoglycemia, \<1% at \<54 mg/dl for severe hypoglycemia, \<25% at \>180 mg/dl for hyperglycemia and \<5% at \>250 mg/dl for severe hyperglycemia. The hemoglobin A1c level is also used for glycemic control.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Case group
Children and adolescents diagnosed with type 1 diabetes aged between 6 to 18 years
sleep, chronotype
Our objectives were to compare sleep health composite dimensions, and chronotype in children and adolescents with and without T1D, and to explore relationship between sleep and glycemic variability in T1D.
Control group
Children and adolescents without type 1 diabetes between the ages of 6 and 18.
sleep, chronotype
Our objectives were to compare sleep health composite dimensions, and chronotype in children and adolescents with and without T1D, and to explore relationship between sleep and glycemic variability in T1D.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sleep, chronotype
Our objectives were to compare sleep health composite dimensions, and chronotype in children and adolescents with and without T1D, and to explore relationship between sleep and glycemic variability in T1D.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Use of continuous glucose monitor system
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed neurodevelopmental or behavioral conditions like autism spectrum disorder or Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
* Diagnosed sleep disorder (Obstructive Sleep Apnea)
* Current use of medications that can impact sleep (diphenhydramine)
6 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marmara University
OTHER
Koç University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Necla İpar
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ipar N, Boran P, Baris HE, Us MC, Aygun B, Haliloglu B, Baygul A, Mutlu GY, Bereket A, Hatun S. The sleep health composite and chronotype among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes compared to case-control peers without diabetes. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025 May 1;21(5):825-834. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11558.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09.2022.575
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.