Quantitative Evaluation of the Impact of Relaxing Eligibility Criteria for Lung Cancer Based on Real-world Data

NCT ID: NCT06314542

Last Updated: 2024-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Eligibility criteria for cancer drug trials are generally too stringent, leading to key issues such as low enrolment rates and lack of population diversity. In order to evaluate the REC of NSCLC drug trials, this study will use deep learning methods to construct a structured real-world database of NSCLC across dimensions, and quantitatively assess the independent contribution of changes in each eligibility criterion to patient numbers, clinical efficacy and safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Restrictive eligibility criteria in cancer drug trials result in low enrollment rates and limited population diversity. Relaxed eligibility criteria (REC) based on solid evidence is becoming necessary for stakeholders worldwide. However, the absence of high-quality, favorable evidence remains a major challenge. This study presents a protocol to quantitatively evaluate the impact of relaxing eligibility criteria in common non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) protocols in China, on the risk-benefit profile. This involves a detailed explanation of the rationale, framework, and design of REC.

To evaluate our REC in NSCLC drug trials, we will first construct a structured, cross-dimensional real-world NSCLC database using deep learning methods. We will then establish randomized virtual cohorts and perform benefit-risk assessment using Monte Carlo simulation and propensity matching. Shapley value will be utilized to quantitatively measure the effect of the change of each eligibility criterion on patient volume, clinical efficacy and safety.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

relaxing eligibility criteria

Quantitative evaluation of the impact of relaxing eligibility criteria on the risk-benefit profile of drugs for lung cancer based on real-world data

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients in the database were considered to be part of the real-world cohort if they were (1) diagnosed with NSCLC according to the tenth revision of the international classification of diseases (ICD-10) code; (2) diagnosed with stage IIIB, IIIC, IV NSCLC between 1 January 2013 and 31 December, 2022; (3) had at least two documented clinical visits on or after 1 January 2013.

Exclusion Criteria

(1)NSCLC in stage I-IIIa
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ning Li, doctor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Beijing, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ning Li, doctor

Role: CONTACT

01087788713

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ning Li

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.