First-in-human Study to Examine Safety of a New Peritoneal Dialysis Device (WEAKID) in End-stage Kidney Disease Patients
NCT ID: NCT06314503
Last Updated: 2025-07-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-22
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will include PD patients of 18 years or older with a well-functioning peritoneal catheter and no history of a PD-related infection for at least eight weeks prior to enrolment.
The main purpose of this study is to assess the (short-term) safety of the WEAKID system in a limited number (n=12) of patients and sessions.
Participants will undergo six treatment sessions (of four or eight hours) in total over a period of two weeks, either with or without a sorbent chamber.
Participants will be asked to collect urine and dialysate the week before the first treatment and during the treatment days. In addition, blood samples will be collected before and during the treatment weeks in order to compare the effects of conventional PD with that of WEAKID treatment. A peritoneal equilibrium test will also be done before and after the treatment weeks to test the function of the lining of the abdomen (the peritoneal membrane).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Formative Usability Testing Study of a Novel Medical Device for Peritoneal Dialysis (WEAKID)
NCT07131995
The Microcirculation, Dialysis Modality and Sequestered Salt
NCT06327750
Late Feasibility Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of AWAK PD Device in Subjects With ESKD.
NCT05827588
24 Hour Use of the Wearable Artificial Kidney
NCT02280005
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Experimental Solution for Peritoneal Dialysis
NCT00214721
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Both peritonitis and high glucose concentrations cause pathological changes of the peritoneal membrane and eventually ultrafiltration failure necessitating a switch to the more invasive and expensive HD treatment. To reduce the existing shortcomings of conventional PD, a novel continuous flow peritoneal dialysis system with dialysate regeneration (WEAKID) for PD was developed. WEAKID treatment is based on continuous recirculation of peritoneal dialysate via the single lumen peritoneal catheter with regeneration of spent dialysate by means of sorbent technology. The WEAKID nighttime system (weight: \~12 kg) is intended to be used for 8h per day (during the night) on a daily basis. Instead of performing 4-6 exchanges with fresh peritoneal dialysate per day, WEAKID uses one peritoneal dialysate filling which is continuously recirculated and regenerated. The continuous regeneration prevents saturation of the dialysate with toxins and thereby maintains a high plasma to dialysate concentration gradient which enhances diffusive transport of uremic toxins. In addition, the continuous recirculating flow of fluid along the peritoneal membrane is expected to increase the mass transfer area coefficient as observed in previous studies with continuous flow peritoneal dialysis, probably due to reduction of diffusion resistance, renewal of stagnant fluid layers at the tissue surface and an increase of the effective membrane area. Both the high plasma to dialysate concentration gradient and the increase in mass transfer contribute to an enhancement of the clearance. Another advantage of the WEAKID system is that the glucose peak load to peritoneum is lower than with traditional automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) thanks to the buffering of the sorbents (sorbents adsorb glucose at the start, lowering the initial glucose peak, and release the glucose again at later stage) and the continuous recirculation.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the (short-term) safety of the WEAKID nighttime system in a limited number (n=12) of patients and sessions (6 sessions per patient).
Secondary objectives of this study are:
1. To evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and device deficiencies (DDs) other than serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and DDs that could have led to a serious adverse event (SAE)
2. To describe the characteristics of WEAKID treatment (i.e. number and duration of sessions, dialysate flow rates)
3. To evaluate the clinical condition and vital signs of the participants during WEAKID treatment
4. To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrafiltration (UF) in relation to glucose concentration during WEAKID treatment
5. To evaluate the efficacy of solute removal and base release of WEAKID treatment
6. To evaluate the evolution of plasma analytes during WEAKID treatment
7. To evaluate the evolution of dialysate effluent analytes of the WEAKID system
8. To evaluate the (technical) device performance of the WEAKID system by the number of device deficiencies, adverse device effects and changes in intraperitoneal pressure
9. To evaluate patient tolerance during WEAKID treatment
10. To evaluate the evolution of uremic symptoms during WEAKID treatment
11. To evaluate the effectiveness of using sorbents for dialysate regeneration and the effectiveness of continuous recirculating flow in relation to the efficacy of solute removal.
The WEAKID system will be tested in a clinical setting on 6 days over a period of 2 weeks. During the first week, the subjects will be treated with the nighttime system without sorbents for 4h (first day) or 8h (second and third day) during daytime. The second week, treatment will consist of the nighttime system with sorbents (also 4h (first day) or 8h (second and third day) during daytime).
This way, exposure to new components of the system is incremental and the effectiveness of the sorbents can be analyzed separately from the effect of continuous recirculating flow dialysis. A peritoneal equilibration test (PET) will be performed at baseline and follow-up. In addition, patients will collect 24h spent peritoneal dialysate and 24h urine followed by venous puncture for blood sampling 3 times prior to WEAKID treatment during standard PD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
WEAKID
Six treatments over the course of two weeks with the WEAKID system
WEAKID
Six treatments over the course of two weeks with the WEAKID system:
* Week 1 (without the sorbents)
* Day 1: four-hour treatment
* Day 2: eight-hour treatment
* Day 3: eight-hour treatment
* Week 2 (with the sorbents)
* Day 1: four-hour treatment
* Day 2: eight-hour treatment
* Day 3: eight-hour treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
WEAKID
Six treatments over the course of two weeks with the WEAKID system:
* Week 1 (without the sorbents)
* Day 1: four-hour treatment
* Day 2: eight-hour treatment
* Day 3: eight-hour treatment
* Week 2 (with the sorbents)
* Day 1: four-hour treatment
* Day 2: eight-hour treatment
* Day 3: eight-hour treatment
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Treated with PD for at least 3 months prior to enrolment
* Well-functioning peritoneal catheter and no peritoneal catheter replacement for at least a month prior to enrolment
* No PD-related infection (exit-site infection, tunnel infection or peritonitis) less than 8 weeks prior to enrolment (counting from the day that the treatment has been finished).
* Previous or current use of Extraneal® with no contra-indications
* Capable of understanding the patient information sheet and informed consent form (ICF) and give informed consent
* Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and attend all study visits
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are unable to comply with study procedures
* Patients who received renal replacement therapy other than conventional PD less than 8 weeks prior to enrolment
* Patients who participated in an intervention trial less than 8 weeks prior to enrolment or are currently participating in an intervention trial. Patients in an observational study without any interventions or in post-market surveillance do not need to be excluded.
* Patients with a PD-related infection (exit-site infection, tunnel infection or peritonitis) less than 8 weeks prior to enrolment (counting from the day that the treatment has been finished)
* Patients with peritoneal catheter dysfunction or mechanical issues less than one month prior to enrolment
* Patients who have never used Extraneal® dialysis fluid or have a contra-indication for Extraneal®: a known allergy to cornstarch or icodextrin; maltose or isomaltose intolerance; glycogen storage disease
* Patients with an incompatible PD connection to the device (e.g. Fresenius PD system)
* Patients with haemoglobin concentrations \< 6.2 mmol/L (\< 10 g/dL) less than 8 weeks prior to enrolment
* Patients with hyperkalemia (\> 6.0 mmol/L) or hyponatremia (\< 130 mmol/L) in the 8 weeks prior to enrolment
* Patients with hypocalcemia (plasma total calcium concentration corrected for albumin \<2.20 mmol/L or ionized calcium \<1.15 mmol/L) or hypomagnesemia (plasma magnesium concentration \<0.70 mmol/L) in the 8 weeks prior to enrolment
* Patients with any serious medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator, may adversely affect the safety of the participant and/or effectiveness of the study
* Female patients who are either (planning to become) pregnant within the study period or breast feeding
* Patients with a life expectancy \<3 months
* Anticipated living donor kidney transplantation \<3 months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Horizon 2020 - European Commission
OTHER
Dutch Kidney Foundation
OTHER
Health Holland
OTHER
Nanodialysis Ltd
UNKNOWN
Università degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE)
UNKNOWN
Servicio Madrileno De Salud (SERMAS)
UNKNOWN
PPI Healthcare Consulting Ltd
UNKNOWN
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karin G.F. Gerritsen
MD, PhD, Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karin GF Gerritsen, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Università degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE)
Modena, Modena, Italy
University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU)
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Hospital Universario La Paz (SERMAS)
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van Gelder MK, Ligabue G, Giovanella S, Bianchini E, Simonis F, Hazenbrink DHM, Joles JA, Bajo Rubio MA, Selgas R, Cappelli G, Gerritsen KGF. In vitro efficacy and safety of a system for sorbent-assisted peritoneal dialysis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020 Aug 1;319(2):F162-F170. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00079.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
van Gelder MK, de Vries JC, Simonis F, Monninkhof AS, Hazenbrink DHM, Ligabue G, Giovanella S, Joles JA, Verhaar MC, Bajo Rubio MA, Selgas R, Cappelli G, Gerritsen KGF. Evaluation of a system for sorbent-assisted peritoneal dialysis in a uremic pig model. Physiol Rep. 2020 Dec;8(23):e14593. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14593.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Website regarding project CORDIAL
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL83843.000.23
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
23-075_CORDIAL_FIH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.