Biological Variables Affecting CD34+ Peripheral Cells Collection Efficiency
NCT ID: NCT06308133
Last Updated: 2024-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
113 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-09-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Evaluation of the Spectra Optia CMNC Collection Procedure
NCT02253160
Two Different Collection Sets for Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Apheresis With Spectra Optia®
NCT01901458
Clinical Significance of Leukocyte Cell Population Data in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs)
NCT06753279
Recruitment and Apheresis Collection of Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Mononuclear Cells and Granulocytes
NCT00001405
Comparison of a Powered Bone Marrow Biopsy Device With a Manual System
NCT01535313
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The PBSC harvest needs dedicated platform for being properly performed: in our institution the Spectra Optia apheresis system (Terumo BCT) is routinely employed with a continuous mononuclear cells collection (cMNC) system. Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT) is designed to optimize PBSC harvest through automated buffy coat interface identification and management, low volume tubing set, low extracorporeal volumes and support of cMNC processing system3. In the dual-step mononuclear cells collection (MNC) system an intermediate chamber is used to collect white blood cells while returning the majority of platelets to the subject. Then optical sensors detect red blood cells (RBC) overflow and leucocytes are intermittently flushed in the collection bag. The cMNC system differs from the former dual-step system by eliminating the intermediate collection chamber used and thus allowing continuous collection of leucocytes from the buffy coat. This approach appears to be less time consuming, more manageable, and more efficient in returning platelet and RBC to the subject4.
One of the main benchmarks of LP quality is the collection efficiency (CE) defined as the ratio between total CD34+ cells yield in apheresis and total CD34+ cells in the processed blood volume (PBV).
Obtaining the highest possible CE for every LP procedure is critical as long as several studies have shown the importance of targeted CD34+ cells yield in order to assure a safe and rapid haematological recovery after the high dose chemotherapy regimens used in HSCT6. Therefore the objective is to reach the target PBSC yield in the safest and quickest way possible: an high CE allows to reduce the PBV and the procedure length.
The CE values are affected by different factors among which blood sample's physical properties. Such factors have been widely studied in MNC protocol7, but less studies concern the cMNC protocol8. In 147 consecutive apheresis procedures performed both on patients and healthy donors with Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT) with cMNC system, Kondo et colleagues found a moderate positive correlation between CD34+ CE and hematocrit (Ht) and only a very week correlation with white blood cells (WBC) and platelet counts. We would like to confirm these data in a setting of subjects with a predominance of patients over healthy donors, thus evaluating the influence of clinical and biochemical factors on CE for autologous and allogenic hematopoietic stem cell production. Finally we would like to assess a possible pre-LP Ht threshold associated with a sufficient (\> 60%) CD34+ CE.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
Patients are defined as subjects affected by a hematological or non-hematological disease for which an autologous stem cells transplantation is recommended. These cases are referred as autologous use of stem cells.
apheresis procedure
collection of hematopoietic stem cells carried out using the single-chamber and continuous mononuclear cell (cMNC) collection system with Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT)
Stem cells donors
Stem cells donors are volunteer healthy subjects who have decided to undergo the procedures needed to collect blood stem cells. These subjects can donate their blood stem cells in favor of a blood relative or, through subscription of a specific registry (IBMDR - International Bone Marrow Donor Registry), to an unknown subject. These cases are referred as allogenic use of stem cells.
apheresis procedure
collection of hematopoietic stem cells carried out using the single-chamber and continuous mononuclear cell (cMNC) collection system with Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
apheresis procedure
collection of hematopoietic stem cells carried out using the single-chamber and continuous mononuclear cell (cMNC) collection system with Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients and stem cell donors that have completed at least one CD34+ apheresis procedure at Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan.
* Age ≥16 years
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maria Cristina Mocellin
Maria Cristina Mocellin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico di natura pubblica
Milan, Milano, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CD34+CE_2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.