Effect of Oral Enteral Nutrition Feeding in Parkinson Disease
NCT ID: NCT06303947
Last Updated: 2024-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-31
2024-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
• Can stellate ganglion block improve the nutritional status, dysphagia, and activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease, better than Nasogastric Tube Feeding.
Participants will be divided into the control group and observation group evenly. All the patients were provided with routine therapy and given nutritional support by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding respectively. The nutritional status, swallowing function, and activities of daily living of the two groups of patients before and after treatment were evaluated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Stellate Ganglion Block in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT06206538
Correlation Between Non-motor Symptoms and Malnutrition in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT04934592
Dietary Intervention and Gastrointestinal Function in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT03851861
Study of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Enteric Neural Pathology in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT04566341
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Constipation in Parkinson's Disease
NCT06388863
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The goal of this or clinical trial is to explore Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs. Nasogastric Tube Feeding on nutritional status, dysphagia, and activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease. The main question it aims to answer are:
• Can stellate ganglion block improve the nutritional status, dysphagia, and activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease, better than Nasogastric Tube Feeding.
Participants will be divided into the control group and observation group evenly. All the patients were provided with routine therapy and given nutritional support by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding and Nasogastric Tube Feeding respectively. The nutritional status, swallowing function, and activities of daily living of the two groups of patients before and after treatment were evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube+comprehensive rehabilitation therapy
Assigned by the random number table. During the treatment, all patients were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy as follows:
Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles.
Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.
Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.
The group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube
The group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.
Comprehensive rehabilitation training
Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles.
Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.
Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.
Nasogastric Tube+comprehensive rehabilitation therapy
Assigned by the random number table. During the treatment, all patients were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy as follows:
Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles.
Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.
Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.
Besides, the group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube Feeding according to the relevant guidelines.
Nasogastric tube
The group is given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient's cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the patient's condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.
Comprehensive rehabilitation training
Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles.
Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.
Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube
The group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.
Nasogastric tube
The group is given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient's cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the patient's condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.
Comprehensive rehabilitation training
Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles.
Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.
Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meeting the diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease.
* Diagnosed with dysphagia confirmed by the video fluoroscopic swallowing study.
* Water swallow test\> Level 3.
* Stable vital signs, conscious, able to cooperate with assessment and treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Complicated with cognitive impairment or consciousness dysfunction.
* Simultaneously suffering from severe liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.
* Complicated with severe liver and kidney failure, tumors, or hematological disorders.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Muhammad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Muhammad
Research Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nieto Luis, Master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Site Coordinator of United Medical Group
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IOE-PKS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.