Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Technique Comparison for Weight Loss
NCT ID: NCT06299644
Last Updated: 2025-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-09-30
2028-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Feasibility of an Endoluminal-suturing Device (Endomina TM) for Gastric Reduction
NCT02534662
ENDOPLY System in Humans: a Pilot Study
NCT06292728
Impact of Wearing a Support Garment Following Parietal Gastrectomy
NCT04938310
Prospective Multicenter Study With the Endomina® Triangulation Platform
NCT05677464
Multi-Center Pre-Bariatric Weight Loss Study
NCT00469391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At present, obesity treatment ranges from lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, endoscopic to surgical intervention. Though bariatric surgery has proven to be the most effective treatment in terms of weight loss, it still carries the complication rates of 0.6% - 4.9%.
Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapy (EBMT) has emerged as an alternative minimally invasive approach for the patients with morbid obesity with the body mass index (BMI) of 30 - 40 kg/m2. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) involves placing sutures inside the stomach using an endoluminal full-thickness suturing device. This allows for gastric volume reduction and impaired gastric motility, which results in weight loss. Recent meta-analysis demonstrated ESG, using OverStitch suturing device, percent total weight loss (%TWL) of 16.09 - 16.43% at 12 months after procedure and a serious adverse event rate of 1 - 2.26%. With favorable outcomes and lower complication rates compared to bariatric surgery, ESG has been growing in popularity and increasingly performed worldwide. Other EBT cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for full thickness tissue approximation include the Incisionless Operating Platform endoscopic plication (USGI Medical, San Clemente, Calif, USA), and Endomina® (Endo Tools Therapeutic, Gosselies, Belgium) which creates gastric plications.
Currently, there is no standardization regarding suturing patterns. One suture pattern for gastric plication that has been used is the "belt and suspenders" pattern whereby plications sutures are placed in the distal gastric body along the width (belt) and mid/proximal gastric body (suspenders). This allows for gastric shortening and reduction in gastric volume. It is suspected this would also alter gastric motility. The distal gastric plications placed near the antrum would result in a disruption of gastric motility; decreased gastric motility would result in decrease gastric emptying and longer satiety.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Belt and Suspenders Configuration
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with the Endomina system creating proximal and distal gastric plications (belt and suspenders configuration).
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty - Belt and Suspenders
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using belt and suspender plications.
Belt Configuration
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with the Endomina system creating distal gastric plications (belt configuration).
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty - Belt
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using belt only plications.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty - Belt and Suspenders
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using belt and suspender plications.
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty - Belt
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using belt only plications.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
3. Capable of giving informed consent and available to return for follow-up visit
Exclusion Criteria
2. Active gastric or duodenal ulceration
3. Malignant or premalignant gastric diseases (such as intestinal metaplasia, high grade dysplasia, gastric adenocarcinoma, or gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST))
4. Severe reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles Classification (LA) Grade C or D)
5. Esophageal or gastric varices and/or portal hypertensive gastropathy
6. Gastroparesis
7. History of gastric surgery/endoscopic procedure
8. Active psychological issues preventing participation in a lifestyle modification program
9. Known history of endocrine disorders affecting weight (uncontrolled hypothyroidism)
10. Severe coagulopathy
11. Active smoking
12. Substance abuse
13. Serious health condition that increased risk of anesthesia and/or endoscopic procedure
14. Pregnancy or lactation
15. Patients who require Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAID) use
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Endo Tools Therapeutics S.A.
INDUSTRY
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
Director of Endoscopy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christopher C Thompson, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ibrahim AM, Ghaferi AA, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Variation in Outcomes at Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence. JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):629-636. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0542.
Docimo S Jr, Aylward L, Albaugh VL, Afaneh C, El Djouzi S, Ali M, Altieri MS, Carter J; American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty and its role in the treatment of obesity: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Nov;19(11):1205-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Sep 16. No abstract available.
Singh S, Hourneaux de Moura DT, Khan A, Bilal M, Ryan MB, Thompson CC. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty worldwide for treatment of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Feb;16(2):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
Li P, Ma B, Gong S, Zhang X, Li W. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for obesity patients: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1253-1260. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06889-6. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Beran A, Matar R, Jaruvongvanich V, Rapaka BB, Alalwan A, Portela R, Ghanem O, Dayyeh BKA. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Meta-analysis of 6775 Individuals with Obesity. Obes Surg. 2022 Nov;32(11):3504-3512. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06254-y. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Jalal MA, Cheng Q, Edye MB. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2020 Jul;30(7):2754-2762. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04591-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023P003282
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.