Reliability of Range of Movement Measurements in Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT06295107
Last Updated: 2025-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
32 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Knee Neuromuscular Assessment in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT06667518
Validity and Reliability of the PROprioception Measurement Tool (PROMT)
NCT05405881
Predictors of Range of Motion and Balance Abnormalities in Children Diagnosed with Cerebral Palsy
NCT06601569
Gastrocsoleus Lengthening in Cerebral Palsy
NCT05783739
Changes in Muscle Activity of Children With Spastic Unilat Cerebral Palsy Using 2 Types of Ankle-foot Orthoses to Walk
NCT03361930
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Overview of the field Evaluating joint mobility is commonly used and important for physicians and physiotherapists assessing and treating children with cerebral palsy, to early detect occurrence of joint contracture. The primarily used method to measure joint pROM is to use a manual goniometer, even if techniques using a smartphone or other electronic device has been demonstrated (Herrero et al. 2011, Ferriero et al. 2013, Hancock et al. 2018). Previous studies indicate that traditional goniometry is usually reliable both for ankle and knee both in individuals with and without spastic muscles (Brosseau et al. 2001, Allington et al. 2002, McWhirk et al. 2006, Konor et al. 2012) even if some authors indicate that there is a considerable variability among children with spasticity (McDowell et al. 2000).
To our knowledge no earlier study has investigated children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy to evaluate the influence of spasticity on pROM measurements. The idea is to use the child as its own control having both a spastic and a non spastic limb.
Project description
Participants Almost all children with cerebral palsy in Sweden are linked to a local habilitation unit where regular assessments are made by the child's physiotherapist. Information from the national quality registry and follow-up program for individuals with cerebral palsy (CPUP) indicates that there are approximately 140 children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (USCP) in Skåne. Families and children (age 2 - 17 years) with USCP linked to habilitation units in Skåne will be asked to participate in the study trough written letter and/or by phone call. When applicable this will be part of the child´s regular and planned assessment. Children with other diagnoses than USCP will be excluded. Children with surgery on the lower extremity within the last year or botox administration to the lower extremity within the last 3 month will also be excluded.
Methods The child will be assessed during one session of around 30-60 min. ROM measurements of knee extension and ankle dorsiflexion will be made on each child's both legs by two investigators with a standard two axis goniometer used in regular practice. The goniometer consists of two 20 cm arms attached in one end by a node and with a grade scale. The CPUP manual describes standardized patient positions and goniometer arm position for ROM in different joints.
For popliteal angle the child is positioned supine with the measured legs hip flexed to 90 degree while the other leg is fixed in extended position. The node of the goniometer is positioned lateral over the knee joint, the fixed arm aligned with femur and pointing towards the greater trochanter, the moving arm is held parallel to the anterior margin of tibia and pointing to the lateral malleolus.
Knee extension is examined with the child in supine position and extended knee, the node of the goniometer is positioned lateral over the knee joint center of rotation, the fixed arm aligned with femur and pointing towards the greater trochanter, the moving arm is held parallel to the anterior margin of tibia and pointing to the lateral malleolus. Knee extension deficit is noted as a negative value.
ROM for the ankle joint is measured with extended knee. The child is positioned in supine position. The subtalar joint is stabilized by the examinator fixating the calcaneus. The intertarsal movement is inhibited by slightly inverting the forefoot. The fixed arm of the goniometer will be parallel to the anterior margin of the tibia and the moving arm parallel to the lateral margin of the foot. 90 degree in the ankle will be noted as 0 degree. Dorsal flexion less than 0 degree will be noted as a negative value.
The two investigators will do measurements separate and blinded from each other. Data including age, sex, spastic side (right/left), Gross Motor Classification System level (GMFCS), use of orthosis and level of spasticity according to Ashworth. Level of spasticity on the spastic side will be a consensus decision by the two investigators.
Statistics Statistical power analyses calculations imply that the planned study need at least 32 children to examine 64 legs. Inter-rater reliability will be evaluated using Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Limits of agreement analysis will also be used. Effect of spasticity on the reliability of pROM measurement will be evaluated comparing the ICC on the spastic leg to the non spastic leg.
Ethics The risk of causing physical harm to the research participants is considered very low. Evaluating pROM is part of regular assessment of these children. The time consumed by participating in the study might be extra compared to normal follow up but is very limited and proportional to valuable information that might be the result of the study. To minimize the pressure on families to participate, families under treatment from the researchers will primarily not be approached. Data collected will be stored in a safe way on encrypted hard drive. Personal numbers will be replaced by serial numbers and only the main researcher will have the code key.
Importance The risk of joint contracture is a major cause for concern in the growing child with cerebral palsy and something that is closely monitored by physicians and physiotherapists. Delayed diagnosis of joint contracture often leads to surgical release, a last option of treatment. The main tool for monitoring is by ROM measurements on a regular basis. Early detection of a decreasing ROM is vital for successful treatment and optimal outcome over time. The current study will add further knowledge on how ROM measurements can be interpreted and so hopefully lead to improved care for this group of children. The results will also be of importance to the research field for planning future studies and interpreting results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spastic leg
Children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
Ankle Passive Range of Movement (pROM)
Ankel and knee pROM measurements.
Knee Passive Range of Movement (pROM)
Ankel and knee pROM measurements.
Non spastic leg
Children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
Ankle Passive Range of Movement (pROM)
Ankel and knee pROM measurements.
Knee Passive Range of Movement (pROM)
Ankel and knee pROM measurements.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ankle Passive Range of Movement (pROM)
Ankel and knee pROM measurements.
Knee Passive Range of Movement (pROM)
Ankel and knee pROM measurements.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
2 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Region Skane
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Olof Lindén
Consultant pediatric orthopedic surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gunnar Hägglund
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Lund University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children Habilitation Unit
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allington NJ, Leroy N, Doneux C. Ankle joint range of motion measurements in spastic cerebral palsy children: intraobserver and interobserver reliability and reproducibility of goniometry and visual estimation. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2002 Jul;11(3):236-9. doi: 10.1097/00009957-200207000-00007.
Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.
Brosseau L, Balmer S, Tousignant M, O'Sullivan JP, Goudreault C, Goudreault M, Gringras S. Intra- and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for measuring maximum active knee flexion and extension of patients with knee restrictions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar;82(3):396-402. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.19250.
Ferriero G, Vercelli S, Sartorio F, Munoz Lasa S, Ilieva E, Brigatti E, Ruella C, Foti C. Reliability of a smartphone-based goniometer for knee joint goniometry. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013 Jun;36(2):146-51. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835b8269.
Gandbhir VN, Cunha B. Goniometer. 2020 Jun 7. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558985/
Hancock GE, Hepworth T, Wembridge K. Accuracy and reliability of knee goniometry methods. J Exp Orthop. 2018 Oct 19;5(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40634-018-0161-5.
Herrero P, Carrera P, Garcia E, Gomez-Trullen EM, Olivan-Blazquez B. Reliability of goniometric measurements in children with cerebral palsy: a comparative analysis of universal goniometer and electronic inclinometer. A pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jul 10;12:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-155.
Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, Grindstaff TL. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):279-87.
Martin RL, McPoil TG. Reliability of ankle goniometric measurements: a literature review. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005 Nov-Dec;95(6):564-72. doi: 10.7547/0950564.
McDowell BC, Hewitt V, Nurse A, Weston T, Baker R. The variability of goniometric measurements in ambulatory children with spastic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2000 Oct;12(2):114-21. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(00)00068-0.
McWhirk LB, Glanzman AM. Within-session inter-rater realiability of goniometric measures in patients with spastic cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006 Winter;18(4):262-5. doi: 10.1097/01.pep.0000234960.88761.97.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
CPUP IS A FOLLOW-UP SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMME FOR PEOPLE WITH CEREBRAL PALSY (CP)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-00195-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.