CT-derived Virtual Stenting Optimize Coronary Revascularization (CT-COMPASS)
NCT ID: NCT06280638
Last Updated: 2025-08-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
280 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-05
2025-07-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Computed tomography (CT) coronary physiology-derived virtual stenting (CT-VS) based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms is an augmented reality (AR) approach that simulates the post-stenting physiology assuming that the specified segment of the treated vessel is successfully dilated by implanting virtual stents. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of optimizing PCI with CT-VS, with high consistency between pre-PCI simulated physiology result by CT-VS and actual post-PCI physiology results. Therefore, the application of CT-VS would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.
However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the efficacy of this novel physiological index that is available pre-PCI in achieving final post-PCI optimal physiological result. The Trials of "Computed Tomography Coronary Physiology-derived Virtual Stenting Guided Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CT-COMPASS)" was designed to assess the efficacy of a CT-VS vs. standard angiographic guidance in achieving post-PCI optimal physiological result (post-PCI FFR≥0.90).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Role of CT Scan for the Successful Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion; a Randomized Comparison Between 3D CT-guided PCI vs. Conventional Treatment (CT-CTO Trial)
NCT02037698
Antegrade and Retrograde Dissection and Re-entry Approach for CTO
NCT03769038
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium (The Optimal Trial)
NCT07286578
Optical Coherence Tomography to Improve Clinical Outcomes During Coronary Angioplasty
NCT02065102
Investigating the Utility of Remote Index of Microvascular Resistance in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion
NCT04226326
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, the post-PCI physiology measurement is one of the effective metrics to quantify residual ischemia, and a suboptimal post-PCI result is strongly associated with worse outcomes. However, PCI optimization based on post-PCI physiology is, to certain extent, a provisional rescue action for a suboptimal index procedure, which may not be fully correctable "after the fact" given selected stents, site of deployment and procedural technique. The resent TARGET-FFR trial demonstrated that post-PCI physiology-guided incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) failed to significantly improve the final physiological results compared to standard angiographic guidance. Therefore, it would be of significant interest if a preprocedural measurement would be able to anticipate to what extent the functional ischemia could be resolved. If residual ischemia estimated from the computation of post-PCI physiology appears to be present, this would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.
The Computed tomography (CT)-derived FFR (CT-FFR) is a novel non-invasive CCTA-based physiological index that has been validated to have good diagnostic accuracy in identifying physiologically significant coronary stenoses compared with FFR as the reference. The CT coronary physiology-derived virtual stenting (CT-VS) based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms, is an augmented reality (AR) approach that simulates the post-stenting physiology assuming that the specified segment of the treated vessel is successfully dilated by implanting virtual stents. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of optimizing PCI with CT-VS, with high consistency between pre-PCI simulated physiology result by CT-VS and actual post-PCI physiology results. Therefore, the application of CT-VS would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.
However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the efficacy of this novel physiological index that is available pre-PCI in achieving final post-PCI optimal physiological result. The Trials of "Computed Tomography Coronary Physiology-derived Virtual Stenting Guided Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CT-COMPASS)" was designed to assess the efficacy of a CT-VS vs. standard angiographic guidance in achieving post-PCI optimal physiological result (post-PCI FFR≥0.90).
Virtual stenting-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS) Protocol: virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. The details of VIOS protocol are as follows: 1) virtual stent with adequate stent parameters is initially implanted to treat lesion with maximal CT-FFR drop (ΔCT-FFR); 2) if the simulated post-PCI CT-FFR is ≥0.90, no further intervention will be performed, and the simulated optimal treatment strategy is determined. If simulated post-PCI CT-FFR is \<0.90, the "Imaging-Heart Team" would then have the following options: a) if there is a CT-FFR drop ≥0.05 across the virtual stented segment(s), the parameters of virtual stent(s) would be optimized (i.e., number of stents, stent diameter, and stent length); b) if there is a CT-FFR drop ≥0.05 across a relatively focal (\<20mm) unstented segment (without virtual stenting) which is suitable for further stenting then a further virtual stent would be implanted; c) simulated post-PCI CT-FFR remains \<0.90 after steps a and/or b: if either of the above criteria remain, option of further optimization of virtual stent parameters or one more additional virtual stent. Following this, the result will be accepted. d) if the simulated CT-FFR gradient is interpreted to reflect diffuse atherosclerosis with no focal CT-FFR drop, the result is accepted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Virtual stenting-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)
Virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. If the patient is assigned to the VIOS, the result of virtual stenting and recommended treatment strategy will be disclosed to the operator. The operator will then follow the recommended strategy to attempt to obtain the target optimal post-PCI FFR result. Blinded FFR must be obtained after PCI.
Virtual stent-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)
PCI is performed according to strategy recommended by "Imaging-Heart Team" based on VIOS protocol.
Standard angiographic strategy
Virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. If the patient is assigned to the standard angiographic strategy, the result of virtual stenting and recommended treatment strategy will be blinded to the operator. The operator will then perform PCI based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice. Blinded FFR must be obtained after PCI.
Standard angiographic strategy
PCI is performed based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Virtual stent-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)
PCI is performed according to strategy recommended by "Imaging-Heart Team" based on VIOS protocol.
Standard angiographic strategy
PCI is performed based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to understand the trial design and provide written informed consent.
3. Patients with a coronary CTA performed within 30 days.
1. The CCTA angiograms amenable to CT-FFR measurement.
2. At least 1 lesion of 50%-90% diameter stenosis in a coronary artery with ≥2.0mm reference vessel diameter by visual assessment.
3. And this target vessel is of physiological ischemia as assessed by CT-FFR.
1\. The interrogated vessel is indicated for intervention assessed by operator based on indications other than CT-FFR.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Severely impaired renal function: creatinine \>150μmol/L or Cockcroft-Gault calculated GFR \<45 ml/kg/1.73 m2 (calculated with Cockcroft-Gault formula).
3. Allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents which cannot be adequately premedicated.
1. The CCTA angiograms deems not amenable to CT-FFR measurement.
2. Patients with only 1 coronary artery lesion with DS \>90% with TIMI flow \<3.
3. An interrogated vessel presented with a CTO lesion.
4. All coronary arteries were not physiologically ischemic.
5. Coronary lesions favor CABG treatment.
1. The interrogated vessel with only 1 coronary artery lesion with DS \>90% with TIMI flow \<3.
2. Coronary lesions favor CABG treatment.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kefei Dou, MD
Kefei Dou, MD, Professor, China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kefei Dou, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sonck J, Nagumo S, Norgaard BL, Otake H, Ko B, Zhang J, Mizukami T, Maeng M, Andreini D, Takahashi Y, Jensen JM, Ihdayhid A, Heggermont W, Barbato E, Mileva N, Munhoz D, Bartunek J, Updegrove A, Collinsworth A, Penicka M, Van Hoe L, Leipsic J, Koo BK, De Bruyne B, Collet C. Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul;15(7):1242-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
Biscaglia S, Verardi FM, Tebaldi M, Guiducci V, Caglioni S, Campana R, Scala A, Marrone A, Pompei G, Marchini F, Scancarello D, Pignatelli G, D'Amore SM, Colaiori I, Demola P, Di Serafino L, Tumscitz C, Penzo C, Erriquez A, Manfrini M, Campo G. QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):783-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.054. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
Collison D, Didagelos M, Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M, Copt S, McDade R, McCartney P, Ford TJ, McClure J, Lindsay M, Shaukat A, Rocchiccioli P, Brogan R, Watkins S, McEntegart M, Good R, Robertson K, O'Boyle P, Davie A, Khan A, Hood S, Eteiba H, Berry C, Oldroyd KG. Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR). Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4656-4668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449.
Zhang R, Xu B, Dou K, Guan C, Zhao Y, Wang X, Zou T, Qiao Z, Xie L, Wang H, Yuan S, Song L, Tu S, Wang Y, Wijns W. Post-PCI outcomes predicted by pre-intervention simulation of residual quantitative flow ratio using augmented reality. Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;352:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.054. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Yang J, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Pan H, Fu X, Liu J, Zhao Y, Escaned J, Wang Y, Fearon WF, Dou K, Kirtane AJ, Wu Y, Serruys PW, Yang W, Wijns W, Guan C, Leon MB, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2149-2159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
Ding D, Huang J, Westra J, Cohen DJ, Chen Y, Andersen BK, Holm NR, Xu B, Tu S, Wijns W. Immediate post-procedural functional assessment of percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence and future directions. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 15;42(27):2695-2707. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab186.
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-2095
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.