CT-derived Virtual Stenting Optimize Coronary Revascularization (CT-COMPASS)

NCT ID: NCT06280638

Last Updated: 2025-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

280 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-05

Study Completion Date

2025-07-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A considerable number of patients presented with anatomically successful PCI results still suffer from functionally unresolved ischemia, which might be the cause for over one-fourth of patients experiencing recurrent angina at 1 year or adverse events at 2 years. Currently, the post-PCI physiology measurement is one of the effective metrics to quantify residual ischemia, and a suboptimal post-PCI result is strongly associated with worse outcomes. However, PCI optimization based on post-PCI physiology is, to certain extent, a provisional rescue action for a suboptimal index procedure, which may not be fully correctable "after the fact" given selected stents, site of deployment and procedural technique.

Computed tomography (CT) coronary physiology-derived virtual stenting (CT-VS) based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms is an augmented reality (AR) approach that simulates the post-stenting physiology assuming that the specified segment of the treated vessel is successfully dilated by implanting virtual stents. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of optimizing PCI with CT-VS, with high consistency between pre-PCI simulated physiology result by CT-VS and actual post-PCI physiology results. Therefore, the application of CT-VS would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.

However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the efficacy of this novel physiological index that is available pre-PCI in achieving final post-PCI optimal physiological result. The Trials of "Computed Tomography Coronary Physiology-derived Virtual Stenting Guided Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CT-COMPASS)" was designed to assess the efficacy of a CT-VS vs. standard angiographic guidance in achieving post-PCI optimal physiological result (post-PCI FFR≥0.90).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronary physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves long-term prognosis in large clinical studies, and wire-based physiological assessments (e.g. fractional flow reserve \[FFR\], instantaneous wave-free ratio \[iFR\]) are recommended by international guidelines. Although prognosis of patients undergoing PCI has improved in recent decades with the continuous refinement of equipment, tools and techniques, a considerable number of patients presented with anatomically successful PCI results still suffer from functionally unresolved ischemia, which might be the cause for over one-fourth of patients experiencing recurrent angina or adverse events after angiographically successful PCI. Therefore, it is of great clinical importance to achieve complete resolution of ischemia and optimal functional results during the index procedure.

Currently, the post-PCI physiology measurement is one of the effective metrics to quantify residual ischemia, and a suboptimal post-PCI result is strongly associated with worse outcomes. However, PCI optimization based on post-PCI physiology is, to certain extent, a provisional rescue action for a suboptimal index procedure, which may not be fully correctable "after the fact" given selected stents, site of deployment and procedural technique. The resent TARGET-FFR trial demonstrated that post-PCI physiology-guided incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) failed to significantly improve the final physiological results compared to standard angiographic guidance. Therefore, it would be of significant interest if a preprocedural measurement would be able to anticipate to what extent the functional ischemia could be resolved. If residual ischemia estimated from the computation of post-PCI physiology appears to be present, this would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.

The Computed tomography (CT)-derived FFR (CT-FFR) is a novel non-invasive CCTA-based physiological index that has been validated to have good diagnostic accuracy in identifying physiologically significant coronary stenoses compared with FFR as the reference. The CT coronary physiology-derived virtual stenting (CT-VS) based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms, is an augmented reality (AR) approach that simulates the post-stenting physiology assuming that the specified segment of the treated vessel is successfully dilated by implanting virtual stents. Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of optimizing PCI with CT-VS, with high consistency between pre-PCI simulated physiology result by CT-VS and actual post-PCI physiology results. Therefore, the application of CT-VS would help physicians to develop the best strategies while planning the procedure.

However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the efficacy of this novel physiological index that is available pre-PCI in achieving final post-PCI optimal physiological result. The Trials of "Computed Tomography Coronary Physiology-derived Virtual Stenting Guided Revascularization Strategy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CT-COMPASS)" was designed to assess the efficacy of a CT-VS vs. standard angiographic guidance in achieving post-PCI optimal physiological result (post-PCI FFR≥0.90).

Virtual stenting-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS) Protocol: virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. The details of VIOS protocol are as follows: 1) virtual stent with adequate stent parameters is initially implanted to treat lesion with maximal CT-FFR drop (ΔCT-FFR); 2) if the simulated post-PCI CT-FFR is ≥0.90, no further intervention will be performed, and the simulated optimal treatment strategy is determined. If simulated post-PCI CT-FFR is \<0.90, the "Imaging-Heart Team" would then have the following options: a) if there is a CT-FFR drop ≥0.05 across the virtual stented segment(s), the parameters of virtual stent(s) would be optimized (i.e., number of stents, stent diameter, and stent length); b) if there is a CT-FFR drop ≥0.05 across a relatively focal (\<20mm) unstented segment (without virtual stenting) which is suitable for further stenting then a further virtual stent would be implanted; c) simulated post-PCI CT-FFR remains \<0.90 after steps a and/or b: if either of the above criteria remain, option of further optimization of virtual stent parameters or one more additional virtual stent. Following this, the result will be accepted. d) if the simulated CT-FFR gradient is interpreted to reflect diffuse atherosclerosis with no focal CT-FFR drop, the result is accepted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coronary Physiology Computed Tomography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Virtual stenting-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)

Virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. If the patient is assigned to the VIOS, the result of virtual stenting and recommended treatment strategy will be disclosed to the operator. The operator will then follow the recommended strategy to attempt to obtain the target optimal post-PCI FFR result. Blinded FFR must be obtained after PCI.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Virtual stent-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)

Intervention Type OTHER

PCI is performed according to strategy recommended by "Imaging-Heart Team" based on VIOS protocol.

Standard angiographic strategy

Virtual Stenting analysis is conducted based on pre-PCI CCTA angiograms by "Imaging-Heart Team" to determine simulated optimal treatment strategy according VIOS protocol. If the patient is assigned to the standard angiographic strategy, the result of virtual stenting and recommended treatment strategy will be blinded to the operator. The operator will then perform PCI based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice. Blinded FFR must be obtained after PCI.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Standard angiographic strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

PCI is performed based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Virtual stent-guided incremental optimization strategy (VIOS)

PCI is performed according to strategy recommended by "Imaging-Heart Team" based on VIOS protocol.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard angiographic strategy

PCI is performed based on international guidelines, local protocols and practice.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VIOS-based PCI angio-based PCI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years.
2. Able to understand the trial design and provide written informed consent.
3. Patients with a coronary CTA performed within 30 days.


1. The CCTA angiograms amenable to CT-FFR measurement.
2. At least 1 lesion of 50%-90% diameter stenosis in a coronary artery with ≥2.0mm reference vessel diameter by visual assessment.
3. And this target vessel is of physiological ischemia as assessed by CT-FFR.


1\. The interrogated vessel is indicated for intervention assessed by operator based on indications other than CT-FFR.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Cardiogenic shock or severe heart failure (NYHA ≥III or LVEF\<30%).
2. Severely impaired renal function: creatinine \>150μmol/L or Cockcroft-Gault calculated GFR \<45 ml/kg/1.73 m2 (calculated with Cockcroft-Gault formula).
3. Allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents which cannot be adequately premedicated.


1. The CCTA angiograms deems not amenable to CT-FFR measurement.
2. Patients with only 1 coronary artery lesion with DS \>90% with TIMI flow \<3.
3. An interrogated vessel presented with a CTO lesion.
4. All coronary arteries were not physiologically ischemic.
5. Coronary lesions favor CABG treatment.


1. The interrogated vessel with only 1 coronary artery lesion with DS \>90% with TIMI flow \<3.
2. Coronary lesions favor CABG treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kefei Dou, MD

Kefei Dou, MD, Professor, China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kefei Dou, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sonck J, Nagumo S, Norgaard BL, Otake H, Ko B, Zhang J, Mizukami T, Maeng M, Andreini D, Takahashi Y, Jensen JM, Ihdayhid A, Heggermont W, Barbato E, Mileva N, Munhoz D, Bartunek J, Updegrove A, Collinsworth A, Penicka M, Van Hoe L, Leipsic J, Koo BK, De Bruyne B, Collet C. Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul;15(7):1242-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35798401 (View on PubMed)

Biscaglia S, Verardi FM, Tebaldi M, Guiducci V, Caglioni S, Campana R, Scala A, Marrone A, Pompei G, Marchini F, Scancarello D, Pignatelli G, D'Amore SM, Colaiori I, Demola P, Di Serafino L, Tumscitz C, Penzo C, Erriquez A, Manfrini M, Campo G. QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):783-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.054. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36898939 (View on PubMed)

Collison D, Didagelos M, Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M, Copt S, McDade R, McCartney P, Ford TJ, McClure J, Lindsay M, Shaukat A, Rocchiccioli P, Brogan R, Watkins S, McEntegart M, Good R, Robertson K, O'Boyle P, Davie A, Khan A, Hood S, Eteiba H, Berry C, Oldroyd KG. Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR). Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4656-4668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34279606 (View on PubMed)

Zhang R, Xu B, Dou K, Guan C, Zhao Y, Wang X, Zou T, Qiao Z, Xie L, Wang H, Yuan S, Song L, Tu S, Wang Y, Wijns W. Post-PCI outcomes predicted by pre-intervention simulation of residual quantitative flow ratio using augmented reality. Int J Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;352:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.054. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35101540 (View on PubMed)

Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Yang J, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Pan H, Fu X, Liu J, Zhao Y, Escaned J, Wang Y, Fearon WF, Dou K, Kirtane AJ, Wu Y, Serruys PW, Yang W, Wijns W, Guan C, Leon MB, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2149-2159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34742368 (View on PubMed)

Ding D, Huang J, Westra J, Cohen DJ, Chen Y, Andersen BK, Holm NR, Xu B, Tu S, Wijns W. Immediate post-procedural functional assessment of percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence and future directions. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 15;42(27):2695-2707. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab186.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33822922 (View on PubMed)

Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30165437 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-2095

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CT-FFR-guided Strategy for In-stent Restenosis
NCT05611190 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA