Risk Factors and Outcomes in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion

NCT ID: NCT06137521

Last Updated: 2024-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

3000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to assess the risk factors and evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or medical treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is still one of the major contributors to global mortality. CTO is a special lesion type of CAD, defined as complete occlusion of at least one major epicardial coronary artery more than 3 months. Compared to non-CTO patients, those with CTO have worse prognosis. The prognosis of CTO patients is related to many factors including the baseline characteristics, modality of treatment and the degree of coronary collateral formation. Figuring out the factors which can indicate the outcomes of CTO is essential to clinical decision making. In this single center, observational study, we collect patient's clinical characteristics and blood samples to investigate potential factors associated with the development of coronary collateral formation and outcomes in patents with stable coronary artery disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Total Occlusion Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with good coronary collaterals

Coronary collateral circulation development was graded according to the Rentrop score, grade 2 (partial filling of the epicardial segment by collateral vessels); grade 3 (complete filling of the epicardial artery by collateral vessels) were defined as good coronary collateral circulation.

Coronary angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients with poor coronary collaterals

Coronary collateral circulation development was graded according to the Rentrop score, grade 0 (no filling of any collateral vessels) and grade 1 (filling of side branches of the artery to be perfused by collateral vessels without visualization of the epicardial segment) were defined as poor coronary collateral circulation.

Coronary angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Coronary angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years; Patients with angina or silent ischemia and documented ischemia; Patients with CTO ≥ 3months

Exclusion Criteria

* eGFR\<15mL/(min·1.73m2); Chronic heart failure with NYHA grade ≥3; Had a history of coronary artery bypass grafting; Had received a percutaneous coronary intervention within the prior 3 months; Malignant tumor or immune system disorders; Pulmonary heart disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fenghua Ding, PhD, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ruijin Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fenghua Ding, PhD, MD

Role: CONTACT

0086 021 64370045

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jian Li

Role: primary

0086 021 64370045

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RFOCTO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.