Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality After Gastric Cancer Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06277908

Last Updated: 2024-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

700 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-18

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastric cancer is still one of the main health care issue and gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the only chance to be cure. Trials show that the postoperative course differs significantly between eastern and western centers, as well as between clinics within Russian Federation. Postoperative 30-day postoperative mortality after gastric cancer surgery ranges from 1% to 5%, and postoperative complication rates range from 10% to 40%. To improve the quality of further studies and recommendations for standardization of surgical treatment of gastric cancer and its complications, there is a need to study the differences in 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality in different clinics and centers of the Russian Federation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) data, gastric cancer is the fourth most common malignant disease and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgery with lymphadenectomy remains the standard of care. Despite significant changes in gastric cancer treatment protocols, surgery is still associated with high risks of complications, with rates varying from clinic to clinic. And currently, the use of multimodal treatments and standardization of surgical procedures are proposed as strategies to improve outcomes. In addition, the use of laparoscopic and robotic techniques have been proposed to provide better short-term results compared to open surgery and comparable long-term oncological outcomes. Randomized trials show that the postoperative course differs significantly between eastern and western centers, as well as between clinics within Russian Federation. Postoperative 30-day postoperative mortality after gastric cancer surgery ranges from 1% to 5%, and postoperative complication rates range from 10% to 40%. While mortality is easier to quantify, there are no standardized criteria for calculating postoperative complication rates. To improve the quality of further studies and recommendations for standardization of surgical treatment of gastric cancer and its complications, there is a need to study the differences in 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality in different clinics and centers of the Russian Federation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer Siewert Type III Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction Stomach Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with morbidity

Patients who suffered from any type of morbidity after surgery

Elective Surgery for gastric cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total, distal or proximal gastrectomy via open, laparoscopic or robotic approach

Patients without morbidity

Patients who did not suffer from any type of morbidity after surgery

Elective Surgery for gastric cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total, distal or proximal gastrectomy via open, laparoscopic or robotic approach

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Elective Surgery for gastric cancer

Total, distal or proximal gastrectomy via open, laparoscopic or robotic approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All consecutive patients with primary gastric malignancy (including Siewert III) undergoing elective surgery with curative intent (either total or partial gastrectomy) via open, laparoscopic or robotic approach between 18th March 2024 and 18th September 2024.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with clinical evidence of metastatic disease, including positive peritoneal cytology on previous staging laparoscopy,
* Patients with known synchronous cancer;
* Patients with Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)
* Presence of gastroesophageal junction (Siewert I and II) malignancy;
* Patients submitted to Emergency surgery or surgery without curative intent;
* Patients undergoing additional surgery (except cholecystectomy) along with surgery for gastric cancer.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrey Ryabov

Head of Department of Thoracoabdominal Oncology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrey Ryabov, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute

Vladimir Khomyakov, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute

Nuriddin Abdulkhakimov, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute

Pavel Smirnov

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

A.Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

P.Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

National Medical Research Centre for Oncology

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andrey Ryabov, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+7 (495) 150-11-22

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Roman Izrailov

Role: primary

Nikolay Semenov

Role: backup

Andrey Ryabov

Role: primary

Nuriddin Abdulkhakimov

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

110-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.