A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarcocimab Tedromer Compared With Sham Treatment in Participants With Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)

NCT ID: NCT06270836

Last Updated: 2025-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

255 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will demonstrate that tarcocimab 5 mg is superior to sham treatment in participants with DR.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, randomized, double-masked, two-arm, multi-center Phase 3 study to demonstrate that tarcocimab 5 mg is superior to sham treatment, with respect to the proportion of eyes improving from baseline at Week 48 in participants with DR.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Retinopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomized 1:1 into one of two arms: KSI-301 or sham.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
To preserve masking, 2 investigators are required for this study. The masked investigator will be responsible for examinations and safety assessments. The unmasked investigator will perform the injections and post-treatment assessments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tarcocimab 5 mg (Treatment Group A)

Tarcocimab 5 mg via intravitreal injection at Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 20, and Week 44.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tarcocimab

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravitreal injection

Treatment Group B

Sham injection on the same schedule as Treatment Group A

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham injection

Intervention Type OTHER

The sham injection is a procedure that mimics an intravitreal injection. It involves pressing the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) against the anesthetized eye. It is performed to maintain masking of the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tarcocimab

Intravitreal injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Sham injection

The sham injection is a procedure that mimics an intravitreal injection. It involves pressing the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) against the anesthetized eye. It is performed to maintain masking of the study.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tarcocimab tedromer KSI-301

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent prior to participation in the study.
* Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c of ≤12%.
* DR in the Study Eye (DRSS as determined by the reading center based on color fundus photographs), who have not previously received intravitreal medications for DR or DME, and in whom pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) can be safely deferred for at least 6 months per the Investigator.
* CST ≤320 microns and a BCVA ETDRS letter score in the Study Eye of ≥69 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 or better) in the Study Eye at screening and confirmed at Day 1; OR
* CST \>320 and ≤350 microns and a BCVA ETDRS letter score in the Study Eye of ≥79 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/25 or better) in the Study Eye at screening and confirmed at Day 1.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior PRP in the Study Eye.
* Current anterior segment neovascularization (ASNV), vitreous hemorrhage, or tractional retinal detachment in the Study Eye.
* Prior intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in the Study Eye for DR or DME within the last twelve (12) months prior to Day 1.
* Prior intravitreal or periocular steroid in the Study Eye for DR or DME within the last twelve (12) months prior to Day 1.
* Prior use of an investigational intravitreal treatment for DR or DME in the Study Eye.
* History of vitreoretinal surgery in the Study Eye.
* History of uveitis in either eye.
* Cataract in the Study Eye that in the judgment of the Investigator is expected to require surgical extraction within 12 months of screening.
* Significant media opacities, including cataract, in the Study Eye that might interfere with visual acuity, assessment of safety, OCT, or FP.
* Any history or evidence of a concurrent ocular condition present in the Study Eye, that in the opinion of the Investigator could require either medical or surgical intervention or alter visual acuity during the study.
* Active or suspected ocular or periocular infection or inflammation.
* Women who are pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant during the study.
* History of a medical condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude scheduled study visits, completion of the study, or a safe administration of investigational product.
* Recent history (within the 6 months prior to screening) of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute congestive heart failure or any acute coronary event.
* Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as a systolic value ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic value ≥ 100 mmHg while at rest.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kodiak Sciences Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pablo Velazquez-Martin, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Kodiak Sciences Inc

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Retina Associates SW

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Orange County

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Global Research Management, Inc. - Lugene Eye Institute

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc.

Modesto, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Southern California

Redlands, California, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc.

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Group of New England, PC

Waterford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Retina Group of Florida

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Center for Retina and Macular Disease

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Southeast Retina Center

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Springfield Clinic LLP

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Associated Vitreoretinal and Uveitis Consultants

Carmel, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Cumberland Valley Retina Consultants

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Nevada

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Envision Ocular, LLC

Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Asheville Eye Associates

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Carolina Retina Associates (Cary)

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Carolina Retina Associates (Wake Forest)

Wake Forest, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cascade Medical Research Institute

Springfield, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Erie Retina Research

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston Neuroscience Institute

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charles Retina Institute

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Retina Associates PC

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Retina Research Institute of Texas

Abilene, Texas, United States

Site Status

Panhandle Eye Group, LLP. - Southwest Retina Specialists

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin Retina Associates, PLLC (Austin)

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin Research Center for Retina

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas (Bellaire)

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Star Vision Research

Burleson, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas (Katy)

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Retina Associates

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin Retina Associates, PLLC (Round Rock)

Round Rock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas (San Antonio)

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas (Woodlands)

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Eye Center

Lynchburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Pacific Northwest Retina (Bellevue)

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane Eye Clinical Research

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Emanuelli Research & Development Center, LLC

Arecibo, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KS301P108

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.